Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Panama Increases Its Canal Tolls
AP | 9/28/02

Posted on 09/28/2002 12:52:50 AM PDT by kattracks

PANAMA CITY, Panama Sept. 28 — Nearly two years after Panama took control of its famous canal, it is launching new rules, starting with a higher toll for ships taking the 50-mile shortcut between the Atlantic and Pacific oceans.

Ships crossing through the canal will be charged an additional 8 percent toll starting Tuesday, followed by a 4 percent hike in July 2003.

The new rates are part of the canal administration's plans to increase capacity and expand to accommodate modern ships, which are much larger than the ones steered through the locks a generation ago.

Loaded ships will pay $2.80 per ton for the first 10,000 tons and $2.78 per ton for the second 10,000 tons. Unloaded ships will pay less.

It is the first rate increase since Panama took over administration of the canal on Dec. 31, 1999.

"The canal is our most important asset," administrator Alberto Aleman Zubieta told The Associated Press. "We must charge the value of the service."

Last year, income from crossings and other services provided by the canal came to $800 million.

Aleman Zubieta said that since its inauguration in August 1914, the canal "basically functioned as a form of subsidy for U.S. commerce," with low tolls that gave the United States, the biggest user, a competitive edge. The canal was built and run by the United States until 1999.

"This non-profit policy was of absolutely no benefit to Panama," said Fernando Manfredo, former assistant canal administrator under the United States.

Panama began running the canal like a for-profit business, and with that came plans to remain competitive.

The canal has not changed since its construction. A system of locks allows ships to be lifted to canal level at one end and then lowered on the other side.

The system has served well for more than 80 years, but the locks must be expanded to handle bigger ships. Ships wider than 106 feet or longer than 965 feet cannot pass through the locks.

"There is a tendency in the industry to move toward the larger and wider ships," Aleman Zubieta said. Panamax are the largest ships that the locks can hold, with a few inches to spare on either side.

The canal expansion is clear, but the financing is not. However, Aleman Zubieta is confident that the funds can be found. The estimated cost is between $8 billion and $10 billion.

"What we want to do is keep Panama as a preferential route, as a natural supply point," he said.

Aleman Zubieta maintains that the canal itself, as a corporation, must assume the loan.

"Panama cannot assume that type of debt. The project must have its own merits," he said.

He added that international financing corporations have shown willingness to provide the funds.

But Manfredo said the expansion project has been around for a decade, and that studies have not been completed.

An expansion of the canal would require an expansion of Lake Gatun, which supplies the large amounts of water dumped into the oceans every time ships passes through. People living around the water basin would also have to be relocated.

Aleman Zubieta says several improvements have been made under Panamanian administration.

He pointed to the widening of the Gaillard Cut, the canal's narrowest point, from 500 feet to 630 feet, thus allowing for more flexible traffic flow.

The 26 locomotives used to pull the ships through the locks also have been replaced at a cost of nearly $2 million each.


Copyright 2002 The Associated Press. All rights reserved.



TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 09/28/2002 12:52:50 AM PDT by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kattracks; All
Unresolved Questions- the Panama canal, good, bad, or a waiting disaster?--thread II
2 posted on 09/28/2002 12:55:56 AM PDT by backhoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
The old U.S. owned and operated Panama Canal was not exactly "non-profit"; it was unique among all U.S. government agencies in that it operated, maintained the canal and paid its workforce completely through the money gained by ship passage fees. Not a dime of U.S. taxpayer money was spent on the canal once it went into full operation in 1913. Jimmy Carter changed all that. While the Panamanians may talk big about their improvements I strongly suspect their plans will come to naught; the old vice of Latin American corruption, cronism and nepotism is already rearing its head in Panama and I suspect the canal will slowly deteriorate until it eventually becomes unusable. Panama, which used to be part of Colombia, was a major nothing until the canal was built by the U.S.; it will slowly return to being a big nothing.
3 posted on 09/28/2002 3:50:59 AM PDT by waxhaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Adventure writer Richard Halliburton swam the length of the Panama Canal in 1928. The toll for his trip was 36 cents.
4 posted on 09/28/2002 3:51:24 AM PDT by billorites
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: billorites
At the new rates ($2.80/ton) that sounds about right, or even a bargin. At the rates in 1928 he was probably ripped off.

If my math is off, I haven't had enough coffee yet today.
5 posted on 09/28/2002 6:03:41 AM PDT by mykej
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
thank you president carter and the chinese thank you too
6 posted on 09/28/2002 6:05:03 AM PDT by TheRedSoxWinThePennant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: redsoxallthewayintwothousand2
The Panama Canal is pretty much useless as an asset of war in this day and age. One missle takes it out.
7 posted on 09/28/2002 8:53:22 AM PDT by kylaka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: backhoe
The canal was run for years at no-profit. The Panamanians always dreamed of the day they would own the canal and make millions off the whole operation. Now that they have control and realize the cost of running the whole thing...the whole of idea of profit has actually gone out the front door. They are simply trying to make enough money to keep the thing up to date and in operation. You must remember that almost every major change or upgrade to the canal...came out of the US pocket and not out of tolls. The Panamanians are discovering that too.
8 posted on 09/28/2002 9:00:54 AM PDT by pepsionice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kylaka
The Panama Canal is pretty much useless as an asset of war in this day and age.

I have to respectfully disagree if china makes a move on taiwan we will need to get our navy over there fast china now with holdings on both sides of the canal could bog it up by sinking a freighter in the canal forcing us to go around the world to get there. Sure we have missles and I still think we would whoop chinas ass I just would prefer to control it out of our national interest.

let me also say that I am not a military expert either but gertz and gaffney both say this was a colossal mistake by the united states.
9 posted on 09/28/2002 9:03:09 AM PDT by TheRedSoxWinThePennant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: redsoxallthewayintwothousand2
Ships are not going anywhere after it gets hit by a small tactical Nuke, or even a few 2000# convential bombs. That is the reason we have separate Atlantic and Pacific Naval commands. The Canal is not a strategic asset anymore to anyone. Heck, we haven't even defended it since WWII.
10 posted on 09/28/2002 10:34:58 AM PDT by kylaka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
*The canal has not changed since its construction. A system of locks allows ships to be lifted to canal level at one end and then lowered on the other side.*

This is actually wrong; iirc the locks were expanded sometime prior to WWII; a third lock set was under construction when WWII broke out and was never finished, though the excavations are still visible, especially from the air.
11 posted on 10/28/2002 9:17:46 PM PST by WoofDog123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheRedSoxWinThePennant
If china makes a move on Taiwan, we need to be there yesterday. The canal isn't going to come into play.

Although the Taiwan Nannies like to ignore it (with "China has no landing craft" diatribes), Taiwan has one of the biggest ports in the world, and it its easy to roll on in from the north end of the island at Tamshui. In fact they could take over the metro at Tamshui and ride into downtown Taipei no problem.

12 posted on 10/28/2002 9:33:31 PM PST by KneelBeforeZod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Should run the Canal give-away against Mondale now as well.
13 posted on 10/28/2002 9:37:48 PM PST by A CA Guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson