Theology, while one of the most honorable of the schools of thought, is not science. Scientific theories today must be phrased in such a fashion that they are disprovable. Otherwise, they are not considered as valid theories. (A nice side debate might be made, then, on whether the theory of evolution is scientific because it does not conform to that pattern, but that is a separate debate.)
Science mainly consists of using specific techniques - hypothesis, experiment, and theory - to enable use to understand the world around us. One cannot validate or invalidate a hypothesis unless one can phrase it in such a manner that it can be invalidated, i.e. disprovable. Once a hypothesis has been repeatedly hammered by experiment, and as it evolves in response to such experiment, then it becomes a theory. (Hey, look, I used evolve in a sentance. Wanna argue about it?)
It can be argued that certain branches of science fit this conceptual model better than others, and it can be argued that the theory of evolution is no theory at all. But that is not the point here. The point here is that Theology is not science.
Perhaps you want to say it is not specifically a science of matter (or whatever else you reserve for the label).
You can reject the validity of the underlying data, but that doesn't change the methodology used to interpret it.
Tell it to St. Thomas.
Whether those things that are of faith can be an object of science ?