Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ex-Senator (Lautenberg) to Replace Torricelli
AP via Yahoo ^ | 10/01/02 | JOHN P. McALPIN

Posted on 10/01/2002 6:03:54 PM PDT by eddie willers

Ex-Senator to Replace Torricelli
Tue Oct 1, 8:52 PM ET

By JOHN P. McALPIN, Associated Press Writer

TRENTON, N.J. (AP) - Desperate to keep their single-seat majority in the Senate, Democrats have chosen former Sen. Frank Lautenberg to replace scandal-tainted Sen. Robert Torricelli ( news, bio, voting record) on the November ballot, The Associated Press has learned.

Photo
AP Photo


Slideshow


(AP Video)
Related Links
Sen. Robert Torricelli (U.S. Senate)

The decision was reached Tuesday evening after a full day of meetings among top state Democrats, according to a party source familiar with the discussions.

An announcement was expected later Tuesday.

Earlier in the day, the 78-year-old Lautenberg indicated he was ready to run.

"I was there (in the Senate) 18 years, and I enjoyed virtually every day," Lautenberg said in a telephone interview from his car as he headed to the governor's mansion for meetings with top state Democrats. "I didn't like raising the money, but I'm not going to mind it as much this time, because it's kind of fresh start."

Whether Lautenberg's name will actually appear the ballot with Republican Douglas Forrester will be decided in court. Republicans say it is too late to replace Torricelli, who dropped out Monday as his poll numbers continued to fall amid questions about his ethics.

The New Jersey Supreme Court will hear arguments on the case Wednesday.

Sen. William Frist, chairman of the Senate GOP campaign committee, said Republicans would consider an appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court ( news - web sites) if the New Jersey court rules in favor of the Democrats.

"This is a desperate grasp at getting around the law and the people of New Jersey are tired of having their leaders go around the law," he said.

Frist said some absentee ballots have already been cast and that other ballots have been distributed to military personnel overseas; the New Jersey Association of County Clerks said about 1,600 absentee ballots were mailed out.

Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle, D-S.D., said that by objecting to Torricelli's request, Republicans were "denying the people of New Jersey a choice" in the election.

Five months ago, Torricelli's Senate seat was considered relatively safe. But support plummeted after he was admonished by the Senate ethics committee for his relationship with a 1996 campaign supporter, and he soon became the most vulnerable incumbent in the country.

Few, however, expected a court fight five weeks before Election Day.

"This is one for the books," said Larry Sabato, a political scientist at the University of Virginia. "It will long be remembered."

Under New Jersey law, a party can replace a statewide nominee on the ballot if the person drops out at least 51 days before the election. Torricelli missed the deadline by 15 days.

However, Democrats say decades of state court decisions put voters' rights above filing deadlines and other technical guidelines.

Attorney General David Samson argued in papers filed with the court Tuesday that the justices have the power to relax the deadline to withdraw and allow Democrats to post another candidate. Samson, who was appointed to his job by Democratic Gov. James E. McGreevey, said election laws have long been interpreted liberally to allow voters every opportunity.

Legal experts agreed.

"In a substantial number of those cases, the courts have ruled on the side of being inclusive," said Richard Perr, an election law professor at Rutgers University Law School.

Six of the seven justices on the state's highest court were appointed by a former Republican governor.

Lautenberg's selection as the potential Democratic savior is replete with irony. He and Torricelli feuded openly while serving together.

"I'm not in a gloating mode," Lautenberg said. "I don't want to be smug about this. It was unfortunate for him and an unfortunate thing for all of us."

Lautenberg is a supporter of abortion rights and staunch opponent of the death penalty. He brings two major strengths to the difficult bid: statewide name recognition and a huge reserve of personal wealth he can use in the campaign. Also, unlike the House members who were also considered as substitute candidates, he does not have anything to lose by running and losing.

Lautenberg was a business executive before serving three terms in the Senate, deciding against a re-election bid in 2000. He counted among his accomplishments a law requiring companies to disclose chemicals they release into the environment, a law banning smoking on domestic flights and a law banning gun ownership by those convicted of domestic violence.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: lautenberg
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 481-484 next last
To: sunshine state
Sure! Anybody else???
141 posted on 10/01/2002 6:44:56 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: section9
Call me crazy, call me irresponsible, or just plain call me, but I think that Forrester will win this race.

He's certainly received "face-time" and impressed me.
Maybe New Jerseyites (sp?) will just do the right thing and save our angst.

142 posted on 10/01/2002 6:45:06 PM PDT by eddie willers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: sneakypete
Kinda like what the RNC did with Giddy Dolt,huh?

Although I am no fan of Libby Dole and dislike her moving to NC to win a Senate seat based upon her national name recognition, she at least had to win the primary election.

143 posted on 10/01/2002 6:46:00 PM PDT by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: Right_in_Virginia; Miss Marple
You know, we REALLY, REALLY need our own cable show. I'm positive we could take these fools with mere facts!
144 posted on 10/01/2002 6:46:02 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: Wphile
My understanding is if we lose NJSC we appeal to the SCOTUS!

Election Law and all that....
145 posted on 10/01/2002 6:46:30 PM PDT by cmsgop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: umgud
Sure,why not .Then we can replace our candidate and so on and so on.If we win then they can recount the votes and so on and so on.Gosh in the end maybe the person with the most votes will win,unless they take it to the Supreme Court and then they can say they really won but our system was corrupt.
146 posted on 10/01/2002 6:46:33 PM PDT by fatima
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: eddie willers
What happened to Pallone??
147 posted on 10/01/2002 6:47:21 PM PDT by CyberAnt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DWPittelli
National Dems really believe that they are the only thing standing between this country and the Fourth Reich-- to them, that is not just rhetoric. Once they convinced themselves of that, you can justify any action. They believe themselves to be morally superior. For example, the Torch never expressed a moment's remorse for what he did except to whine that he may lose an election, and that was more than unacceptable to the Dems, it was immoral. The Clintonization of the once-proud Dem Party is complete. Disgusting.
148 posted on 10/01/2002 6:47:42 PM PDT by RecallJeffords
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: mwl1
. Any court that chooses to vacate the 51 day rule will be overturned by the US Supremes.

Naw, SCOTUS won't get into a "local" race.

149 posted on 10/01/2002 6:47:50 PM PDT by MileHi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
"I'm positive we could take these fools with mere facts!"

You know what's sad? The Dems don't even care about the facts... As long as they win the facts don't even matter...

150 posted on 10/01/2002 6:47:55 PM PDT by marajade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: eddie willers
Attorney General David Samson argued in papers filed with the court Tuesday that the justices have the power to relax the deadline to withdraw and allow Democrats to post another candidate.

The AG arguing AGAINST THE LAW OF THE STATE. Grounds for impeachment, if you ask me.

151 posted on 10/01/2002 6:48:49 PM PDT by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Let's have Donahue as our first guest ;^D
152 posted on 10/01/2002 6:48:52 PM PDT by Right_in_Virginia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: All
Why isn't anyone (press, RNC, someone?) stressing the fact that the Torch FORFEITED?
153 posted on 10/01/2002 6:48:59 PM PDT by Unknown Freeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: fatima
Anyone know the Dem/Pub makeup in the NJ Legislature? I'm thinking impeachment of these judges may be in the picture at some point if they don't play this one straight.
154 posted on 10/01/2002 6:49:06 PM PDT by gov_bean_ counter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: section9
I tend to agree with you...Dick Morris may be right....we know how the die-hard rats will vote, but the independents may be so disgusted by all of this and vote for Forrester....
155 posted on 10/01/2002 6:49:08 PM PDT by mystery-ak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: marajade
I know; don't remind me. I'm pretending.
156 posted on 10/01/2002 6:49:24 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

To: CyberAnt
"What happened to Pallone??"

His wife said no.
157 posted on 10/01/2002 6:49:30 PM PDT by marajade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: eddie willers
A month before the election, Congress approved and President Bill Clinton signed into law a measure sponsored by Sen. Frank Lautenberg, D.-N.J., forbidding anyone who has committed a misdemeanor act of domestic abuse from possessing a handgun.

Lautenberg and Clinton championed the bill as necessary to protect women, children and other living things
158 posted on 10/01/2002 6:49:57 PM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Right_in_Virginia
No. We will have Bill Clinton.
159 posted on 10/01/2002 6:50:31 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: CyberAnt
What happened to Pallone??

P.W. Pallone's wife said he couldn't come out and play.

160 posted on 10/01/2002 6:50:36 PM PDT by gov_bean_ counter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 481-484 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson