Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ex-Senator (Lautenberg) to Replace Torricelli
AP via Yahoo ^ | 10/01/02 | JOHN P. McALPIN

Posted on 10/01/2002 6:03:54 PM PDT by eddie willers

Ex-Senator to Replace Torricelli
Tue Oct 1, 8:52 PM ET

By JOHN P. McALPIN, Associated Press Writer

TRENTON, N.J. (AP) - Desperate to keep their single-seat majority in the Senate, Democrats have chosen former Sen. Frank Lautenberg to replace scandal-tainted Sen. Robert Torricelli ( news, bio, voting record) on the November ballot, The Associated Press has learned.

Photo
AP Photo


Slideshow


(AP Video)
Related Links
Sen. Robert Torricelli (U.S. Senate)

The decision was reached Tuesday evening after a full day of meetings among top state Democrats, according to a party source familiar with the discussions.

An announcement was expected later Tuesday.

Earlier in the day, the 78-year-old Lautenberg indicated he was ready to run.

"I was there (in the Senate) 18 years, and I enjoyed virtually every day," Lautenberg said in a telephone interview from his car as he headed to the governor's mansion for meetings with top state Democrats. "I didn't like raising the money, but I'm not going to mind it as much this time, because it's kind of fresh start."

Whether Lautenberg's name will actually appear the ballot with Republican Douglas Forrester will be decided in court. Republicans say it is too late to replace Torricelli, who dropped out Monday as his poll numbers continued to fall amid questions about his ethics.

The New Jersey Supreme Court will hear arguments on the case Wednesday.

Sen. William Frist, chairman of the Senate GOP campaign committee, said Republicans would consider an appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court ( news - web sites) if the New Jersey court rules in favor of the Democrats.

"This is a desperate grasp at getting around the law and the people of New Jersey are tired of having their leaders go around the law," he said.

Frist said some absentee ballots have already been cast and that other ballots have been distributed to military personnel overseas; the New Jersey Association of County Clerks said about 1,600 absentee ballots were mailed out.

Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle, D-S.D., said that by objecting to Torricelli's request, Republicans were "denying the people of New Jersey a choice" in the election.

Five months ago, Torricelli's Senate seat was considered relatively safe. But support plummeted after he was admonished by the Senate ethics committee for his relationship with a 1996 campaign supporter, and he soon became the most vulnerable incumbent in the country.

Few, however, expected a court fight five weeks before Election Day.

"This is one for the books," said Larry Sabato, a political scientist at the University of Virginia. "It will long be remembered."

Under New Jersey law, a party can replace a statewide nominee on the ballot if the person drops out at least 51 days before the election. Torricelli missed the deadline by 15 days.

However, Democrats say decades of state court decisions put voters' rights above filing deadlines and other technical guidelines.

Attorney General David Samson argued in papers filed with the court Tuesday that the justices have the power to relax the deadline to withdraw and allow Democrats to post another candidate. Samson, who was appointed to his job by Democratic Gov. James E. McGreevey, said election laws have long been interpreted liberally to allow voters every opportunity.

Legal experts agreed.

"In a substantial number of those cases, the courts have ruled on the side of being inclusive," said Richard Perr, an election law professor at Rutgers University Law School.

Six of the seven justices on the state's highest court were appointed by a former Republican governor.

Lautenberg's selection as the potential Democratic savior is replete with irony. He and Torricelli feuded openly while serving together.

"I'm not in a gloating mode," Lautenberg said. "I don't want to be smug about this. It was unfortunate for him and an unfortunate thing for all of us."

Lautenberg is a supporter of abortion rights and staunch opponent of the death penalty. He brings two major strengths to the difficult bid: statewide name recognition and a huge reserve of personal wealth he can use in the campaign. Also, unlike the House members who were also considered as substitute candidates, he does not have anything to lose by running and losing.

Lautenberg was a business executive before serving three terms in the Senate, deciding against a re-election bid in 2000. He counted among his accomplishments a law requiring companies to disclose chemicals they release into the environment, a law banning smoking on domestic flights and a law banning gun ownership by those convicted of domestic violence.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: lautenberg
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 481-484 next last
To: Unknown Freeper
"Does Forrester get any equal time here? Anyone?"

There was a time that equal time was done. It was overturned somewhere in the 93-95 area. Not sure.

61 posted on 10/01/2002 6:24:58 PM PDT by AGreatPer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: tomahawk
(It's more like America is doomed because DemonCraps have destroyed the rule of law at every level, including in the selection of our government)

I think we have the Republicans in the Senate to blame, they started this garbage by going along with a sham trial for Clinton. The Republicans in the House had courage. The Republicans have brought this on themselves.
62 posted on 10/01/2002 6:25:01 PM PDT by HoundsTooth_BP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: eddie willers
Five months ago, Torricelli's Senate seat was considered relatively safe. But support plummeted after he was admonished by the Senate ethics committee for his relationship with a 1996 campaign supporter, and he soon became the most vulnerable incumbent in the country.

Ah, so it was just his relationship. No illegalities, no crimes, no bribes, no manipulation of the highest level governments in exchange for cash and gifts. Just a relationship.

63 posted on 10/01/2002 6:25:06 PM PDT by Jonathon Spectre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
right in front of our very eyes, in plain daylight.

Don't you all see? It is just so clear. Torrecelli will run and he will win because of this little scheme of theirs.

The courts won't let him off the ballot and they know it. They have now chosen the crappiest candidate they could find so that after Torrecelli is forced to stay on the ballot, the voters will flood the polls to vote him in.

He didn't have a prayer before all this, and now he will be seen as a savior for NJ. Just watch.

64 posted on 10/01/2002 6:25:16 PM PDT by Semper911
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: nutmeg
The RATS are swirling down the toilet as we speek. This is the end for them for many years to come
65 posted on 10/01/2002 6:25:48 PM PDT by MJY1288
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: formerliberal_nowconservative
I agree. In his remarks, Lautenberg struck me as someone who in his youth was an intelligent person. But now, he fumbled so badly it was almost embarrassing. I don't mean this to be cruel, but I found myself thinking whether, at 78, he's had mini-strokes that have caused some cerebral damage.
66 posted on 10/01/2002 6:25:54 PM PDT by governsleastgovernsbest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
I think it would be fun to beat Tom Daschle about the head and shoulders for a few minutes.

Get in line Bub!

New game in town! Tag team senate races!

67 posted on 10/01/2002 6:26:12 PM PDT by Bigun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: eddie willers
This is a travesty. They can't do this. These people have to be stopped!
68 posted on 10/01/2002 6:26:20 PM PDT by Musket
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Semper911
Where is Donnie Di hiding tonight? And would someone please slap Alan Colmes for defending this outrage.
69 posted on 10/01/2002 6:26:23 PM PDT by Unknown Freeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Not being honest about their dishonesty? Is someone going to say "Half the lies they tell about NJ politics aren't true!"?
70 posted on 10/01/2002 6:26:40 PM PDT by 185JHP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: nutmeg
Yeah, he is. But all he needs is to
be alive, walking & talking. At least
for now...
71 posted on 10/01/2002 6:27:11 PM PDT by txrangerette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: MJY1288
This cracks me up. I thought Torricelli agreed to withdraw provided someone other than Lautenberg took his place. Torricelli can't stand Lautenberg and vice versa. Looks like bobby has to learn the hard way - never make a deal with the devil, i.e., the dems. They will screw regardless.

Utterly shameless.

I HATE THE DEMOCRATS!

72 posted on 10/01/2002 6:27:13 PM PDT by Wphile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: eddie willers
View Report Card of Sen. Lautenberg's Immigration Actions

http://216.239.53.100/search?q=cache:5QLdr34pKvsC:profiles.numbersusa.com/improfile.php3%3FDistSend%3DNJ%26VIPID%3D524+Sen.+Frank+Lautenberg,+Clinton&hl=en&ie=UTF-8
73 posted on 10/01/2002 6:27:26 PM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eddie willers
I'm doing everything I can to not get myself banned from FR.It's all I can do to keep my fingers from typing what I'm really thinking.Deja vu all over again. There goes Halloween,and I hope not Christmas and Thanksgiving again.My poor husband better get used to a dirty house,no food, and a wife that mutters something about "dirty Rat-B--tards.
74 posted on 10/01/2002 6:28:20 PM PDT by sissyjane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cardinal4
If these Judges dont recuse themselves for that, the dems will probably pull this off at the state level.

Do you think they will willingly? This is Jersey, for krissakes. A town run by the mob and the Torch and Louseybird.

I bet money is changing hands and dead deamoncraps are lined up to vote. It ain't gonna be pretty.

75 posted on 10/01/2002 6:28:23 PM PDT by MileHi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: You Gotta Be Kidding Me
Does anyone have confidence that the modern judiciary will apply the law as enacted by a legislature, if the law compels a result the court doesn't like? Already the same arguments from Florida are shaping up, e.g. err on the side of "inclusiveness" if the law requires a different result. What tripe.

Here we go again. Only this time it is more disgusting because the Tush dropped out because he was going to lose. If anyone "disenfranchised" voters and deprived them of a choice, it was the Tush. They may actually get away with this.

76 posted on 10/01/2002 6:28:25 PM PDT by RecallJeffords
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper
And all these leftists call Bush a "Hitler"... Heck, I think we have a bunch of Hitlers in the dem party in NJ
77 posted on 10/01/2002 6:28:28 PM PDT by marajade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: MJY1288
I've never seen anything quite like it, and I've seen some "stuff," if you know what I mean.

It's a full court press, as far as I can see, to get what they want and get it NOW. It's a complete and utter power grab.

78 posted on 10/01/2002 6:28:45 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
I'm hoping I'm not bending the rules by mentioning that sometimes I think it would be fun to beat Tom Daschle about the head and shoulders for a few minutes.

Yeah, but your back would hurt like hell later from all that stooping over...

79 posted on 10/01/2002 6:28:54 PM PDT by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Semper911
No, they have essentially forfeited this seat. Any court that chooses to vacate the 51 day rule will be overturned by the US Supremes. I still have faith in the rule of law in this country. What they are attempting is like something from a banana republic.
80 posted on 10/01/2002 6:29:35 PM PDT by mwl1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 481-484 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson