OK:
Now what else he said. He said that he and his people and the Third Way is based on "ideas", meanwhile, we conservatives are prisoners of "ideology". He criticised President Bush, saying he disagreed with him on "everything" and nattered on about the "children" and talked about "education" and "health care" and how his vile wife calls Washington DC an "evidence free zone".
I will post more when I have it, but what a festival of vomiting and disgust. Including praise for Nelson Mandela.
Regards, Ivan
1 posted on
10/02/2002 8:12:14 AM PDT by
MadIvan
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
2 posted on
10/02/2002 8:12:28 AM PDT by
Mo1
To: BigWaveBetty; JeanS; schmelvin; MJY1288; terilyn; Ryle; MozartLover; Teacup; rdb3; fivekid; ...
Bump!
3 posted on
10/02/2002 8:13:02 AM PDT by
MadIvan
To: MadIvan
Isn't this the same Bill Clinton who sought and received congressional approval for a regime change in Iraq? Who thought nothing of lobbing a few cruise missles in to district us from his impeachment?
To: MadIvan
Just when I think I can't be any more disgusted by the ex-pres, he goes and does something that pushes me over the edge again. Sheesh. I wish he'd just shut up and go away. Hasn't he done enough damage?!
6 posted on
10/02/2002 8:17:36 AM PDT by
iceskater
To: MadIvan
"Pentagon says at least one US serviceman killed in bombing near Philippines "
Will Baghdad Bonior offer comfort to the men who killed this young serviceman, or maybe spit in the eye of the young man's mother? How about calling his Commander and Chief a liar? Come on creepy democrats, step up to the plate.
7 posted on
10/02/2002 8:19:00 AM PDT by
GOPJ
To: MadIvan
Typical Clinton: pretend to defend the institution while implicitly defeating its purpose. If the UN was designed to promote collective security, its mission has utterly failed. It now serves only as a joint defense team for petty thugs and menacing dictators, obstructing any attempt at international security. Why should we be surprised that Clinton would support it? -- he knows all about obstruction.
8 posted on
10/02/2002 8:19:03 AM PDT by
scalia_#1
To: MadIvan
It really burns me that these socialist whackos will call that slime Clinton by "President", yet refer to President Bush as "Bush"
10 posted on
10/02/2002 8:20:04 AM PDT by
trebb
To: MadIvan
I take it Kosovo was much more of a threat than Iraq </sarcasm
12 posted on
10/02/2002 8:21:31 AM PDT by
jdontom
To: MadIvan
Politics matters and even if you're a former president So he actually accepts now he is no longer President? That's a first! :-)
13 posted on
10/02/2002 8:22:09 AM PDT by
Happygal
To: MadIvan
If only Billy Boy were locked far away in a padded, SOUNDPROOF room where he can bugger himself to his sick heart's content.
Clinton: 'War Is Last Resort' Your ordering our great military to fight on the side of Muslim terrorists and against innocent Christians in Kosovo was a "last resort?" A nation that didn't even remotely threaten us? May you burn in Hell, Slick.
23 posted on
10/02/2002 8:29:52 AM PDT by
Mr. Mojo
To: MadIvan
To: MadIvan
This makes me furious! What is with all of these rats going all over the world badmouthing the President of the United States? In my world, this is traitorious behavior! But then what else can we expect from a man who took money from Communist China at the expense of our national security!!!!!
TRAITOR!!!!! TRAITORS ONE AND ALL!!!!
To: MadIvan
"But if we can we have to do it in the context of building the international institutions that in the end we will have to depend upon to guarantee the peace and security of the world and the human rights of all people everywhere." When all the member nations of the UN are democracies, then MAYBE we can rely on them to genuinely care about peace, security, and human rights. In the meantime, they're just a bunch of anti-American kleptocracies interested only in our money.
33 posted on
10/02/2002 8:50:59 AM PDT by
kezekiel
To: MadIvan
No, not clinton again. Make the bad man go away!
To: MadIvan
Doesn't this walking sack of shite realize he's been totally discredited in the eyes of history?
36 posted on
10/02/2002 8:57:33 AM PDT by
My2Cents
To: MadIvan
Clinton's really just afraid of any collateral damage in Iraq. There are a few Iraqi women he hasn't shagged yet.
To: MadIvan
Classic Ivan - thanks and bttt
42 posted on
10/02/2002 9:29:17 AM PDT by
lodwick
To: MadIvan
Did someone say "third way"? (^:
... So in 1919, Mussolini came up with an alternative strategy. He called it Fascism. Mussolini described his new movement as a ``Third Way'' between capitalism and communism. As under communism, the state would exercise dictatorial control over the economy. But as under capitalism, the corporations would be left in private hands.
Hitler followed the same game plan. He openly acknowledged that the Nazi party was ``socialist'' and that its enemies were the ``bourgeoisie'' and the ``plutocrats'' (the rich). Like Lenin and Stalin, Hitler eliminated trade unions, and replaced them with his own state-run labor organizations. Like Lenin and Stalin, Hitler hunted down and exterminated rival leftist factions (such as the Communists). Like Lenin and Stalin, Hitler waged unrelenting war against small business.
A Little Secret About the Nazis
Joseph Goebbels own words: "Those Damn Nazis", long German propaganda piece defining intent and meaning of the Nazi's....National, Socialists....left-wing, "third way.".
Socialist Origins of Neo-Nazi-ism
You Mean Hitler Wasn't a Priest?
All Socialism is National.
Why Clinton SleptTapes used to provide evidence against Islamic terrorist funding "charities" made in '93. Dick Morris:
Liberals felt that the civil rights of suspected terrorists were more important than cutting off their funds. George Stephanopoulos, the ankle bracelet that kept Clinton on the liberal reservation, explains in his memoir "All Too Human" that he opposed the proposal to "publish the names of suspected terrorists in the newspapers" with a "civil liberties argument" and by pointing out that Attorney General Janet Reno would object.
Secretary of State Madeleine Albright wasted no time denouncing Senator Jesse Helms' address to the UN. Using an opportunity to meet with the UN Security Council, Secretary Albright sought to smooth ruffled feathers among her former colleagues. "Let me be clear. Only the president and the executive branch can speak for the United States." - Secretary of State Madeline Albright, Jan. 2000 http://www.enterstageright.com/archive/articles/0200helms.htm |
To: MadIvan
You all are being warmongers. The use of military force is only justified when it is neccesary to divert the attention of the media from personal misbehavior by a Democrat.
-Eric
45 posted on
10/02/2002 10:05:39 AM PDT by
E Rocc
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson