Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ninenot; Nogbad; keri; The Great Satan; okie01; Shermy; aristeides; BlackVeil; Fred Mertz; ...
Thanks for posting this interesting article.

As I've been suggesting, a war with Iraq is merely preliminary to what will turn out to be a much more difficult war against the shadowy terrorist groups. Right now, Iraq is stronger militarily than those groups, but Iraq is vulnerable to U.S. military might. The terrorist groups are currently less of a threat, but they are much more difficult to fight, and they will be getting stronger.

I believe that it does make sense to tackle Iraq now, both because of the semi-traditional threat that it embodies (which is Pres. Bush's primary justification for the war) and because it will deprive the terrorists of some powerful state support, including a likely base of operations.

Nevertheless, this is one of the last stands of conventional warfare, rather than the true beginning of the war against Islamic terrorism.

3 posted on 10/08/2002 9:48:00 AM PDT by Mitchell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Mitchell
Thanks for the analysis!
6 posted on 10/08/2002 10:03:41 AM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson