Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

***I'm Sorry, But Byrd Needs To Go Home***
Stardate: 0210.9

Posted on 10/09/2002 11:55:10 AM PDT by The Wizard

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 last
To: The Wizard
I've been saying he should retire for YEARS!!! There are some others who should go with him.
41 posted on 10/09/2002 1:33:38 PM PDT by bluewater bird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Wizard
Let him ramble on, the more he blows and goes the better WE look.

Besides, the only way this old man is gonna leave the senate is by his passing on, if you will.


42 posted on 10/09/2002 1:34:49 PM PDT by unixfox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

The Freeper Tagline Challenge!
For every dollar donated to FR in support of bringing back the Tag Line
I will match those donations up to a total of $500

Please let me know the amount you donate, thanks.

Donate Here By Secure Server

Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794

or you can use

PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com

Fund Raiser thread here

43 posted on 10/09/2002 1:35:55 PM PDT by lodwick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: The Wizard
I have a different take on Sen. Byrd and what the Bush Administration should do about him: nothing!

I think that it was Napoleon that said, "Never interrupt your enemy when he is making a mistake." Byrd, in my opinion is making a huge mistake on behalf of the Democratic Party. Since military action will not occur until JAN-FEB '03, it isn't really important if the resolution is delayed by a couple of weeks. It won't affect war planning.

The election prospects for the Democrats are another matter. November is fast approaching.

44 posted on 10/09/2002 1:45:21 PM PDT by Tallguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Canadian Outrage
bump
45 posted on 10/09/2002 2:19:32 PM PDT by The Wizard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj
hear, hear
46 posted on 10/09/2002 2:20:06 PM PDT by The Wizard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: mwl1
yes, cloture....shut the F up in common language
47 posted on 10/09/2002 2:21:23 PM PDT by The Wizard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: The Wizard
I think Byrd has Earl Long potential -- a guy who descends into Alzheimer's rapidly, publicly and dramatically rather than privately and slowly.

In a few months he's gone from the pompous ass he's been for the past half-century to a guy who makes no sense on the podium, and who demands the podium more and more frequently for longer periods of time.

Depending on how you feel about Byrd, human dignity, and the stature of the Senate, the spectacle will be really depressing or really entertaining.

The psychotic break may occur in next week's filibuster, or not for a few weeks or months, but it's coming. If Daschle has any mercy, he'll find a way to limit Byrd's floor time.
The alternative is to have orderlies in white coats with butterfly nets at Byrd's side at all times.

Byrd is 3rd in line of succession to the Presidency. That's a comforting thought.


48 posted on 10/09/2002 2:53:28 PM PDT by Man of the Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Man of the Right

49 posted on 10/09/2002 2:55:59 PM PDT by ALS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: ALS
bump
50 posted on 10/09/2002 2:58:19 PM PDT by MinuteGal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: The Wizard
Actually, there's a genuine method to Cuckoo-Byrd's oratorical madness.

For a long time now, he's been the annointed Dem fillibusterer to camp out at the podium while back-room wheeling, dealing and trade-voting takes place elsewhere. Most viewers have no clue that he's always speaking to an almost empty floor.

Neither side wants a vacant screen appearing on C-Spam when they're conniving elsewhere, so they'll always send an accomplished yakker up to the mike to fill in the time, no matter what his IQ.

I'm so happy Byrdbrain is the Dem's designated schitter!

Leni

51 posted on 10/09/2002 3:08:30 PM PDT by MinuteGal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Wizard
LOL My husband was watching TV & throwing a hissey. WhenI went in to see what was going on, he said "Byrd needs to retire".
52 posted on 10/09/2002 3:13:03 PM PDT by Ditter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Man of the Right
I enjoyed your post, but I grew up on Westerns. You had to check your gun before you had a drink with Miss Kitty. I try not to fly, but when I do I don't hanker being belted in when the Battle of Ia Drang Valley is being re-enacted at 35,000 feet. The crew should be armed. I'll take my chances that a 30-year Delta captain won't shoot me dead.

Regarding the war, whether Iraq is a threat tomorrow or 10 years from now, I'll breathe easier when Saddam is taken down. They are slow learners -- they're what National Geographic used to call a primitive society in the days before political correctness -- but after Iraq goes, I think Iran, then Syria, and finally Libya will begin to get the picture. If they're as dumb as they look, perhaps Iran will have to be taken down before Syria and the PLO get it.

There will be negative consequences from the war, but I don't think they're what people expect -- lots of dead Americans. It's possible the Chicoms will draw closer to the Russians to try to trump all-powerful America. And our so-called "allies" -- the French and Germans -- will give us more grief. But any country at risk to go under the crosshairs will move very circumspectly.

If nothing is done, the U.S. will be hit by at least one atomic bomb and/or smallpox pandemic in this decade. The war buys time to overcome the Islamist movement and for Russia and China to evolve into full democracies. Mid-century, perhaps China will have a bigger economy than America, and they can assume the role of global cop and we can gripe like the Swedes, and the Canadians, and the French. Meanwhile, we're it.

Some conflicts can't be won with a few guys with deer rifles. This is one of them. It takes the global military power of the big, bad U.S.A. Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Rice, and Wolfowitz included.





53 posted on 10/09/2002 8:11:43 PM PDT by Man of the Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Man of the Right
I enjoyed your post, but I grew up on Westerns. You had to check your gun before you had a drink with Miss Kitty. I try not to fly, but when I do I don't hanker being belted in when the Battle of Ia Drang Valley is being re-enacted at 35,000 feet. The crew should be armed. I'll take my chances that a 30-year Delta captain won't shoot me dead.

Regarding the war, whether Iraq is a threat tomorrow or 10 years from now, I'll breathe easier when Saddam is taken down. They are slow learners -- they're what National Geographic used to call a primitive society in the days before political correctness -- but after Iraq goes, I think Iran, then Syria, and finally Libya will begin to get the picture. If they're as dumb as they look, perhaps Iran will have to be taken down before Syria and the PLO get it.

There will be negative consequences from the war, but I don't think they're what people expect -- lots of dead Americans. It's possible the Chicoms will draw closer to the Russians to try to trump all-powerful America. And our so-called "allies" -- the French and Germans -- will give us more grief. But any country at risk to go under the crosshairs will move very circumspectly.

If nothing is done, the U.S. will be hit by at least one atomic bomb and/or smallpox pandemic in this decade. The war buys time to overcome the Islamist movement and for Russia and China to evolve into full democracies. Mid-century, perhaps China will have a bigger economy than America, and they can assume the role of global cop and we can gripe like the Swedes, and the Canadians, and the French. Meanwhile, we're it.

Some conflicts can't be won with a few guys with deer rifles. This is one of them. It takes the global military power of the big, bad U.S.A. Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Rice, and Wolfowitz included.





54 posted on 10/09/2002 8:13:00 PM PDT by Man of the Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson