Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

THE OKLAHOMA CITY -- 911 CONNECTION
http://twa800.com/news/mastalk-10-10-02.htm ^ | 10/13/02 | Michael Smerconish

Posted on 10/13/2002 4:03:40 PM PDT by JohnFiorentino

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-74 next last
To: Lockbox
Yeah, but remember: He didn't inhale :-)
21 posted on 10/13/2002 4:56:45 PM PDT by JohnFiorentino
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: stevem
The ugly secret is that it was the clinton administration that had to have McVeigh and Nichols as the only perpetrators. Otherwise, those people might have had to act in the interests of the US.

Absolutely, positively correct! Just as it shows in Freeh's testimony back in 98 & 99, the main terrorists they were concerned about was 'right-wing' groups. I wish Woolsey would tell all he knows.

22 posted on 10/13/2002 5:12:48 PM PDT by Maigret
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Maigret
I wish Woolsey would tell all he knows.

So do I, but it's not going to happen.

23 posted on 10/13/2002 5:18:46 PM PDT by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: JohnFiorentino
Bump for later reading.
24 posted on 10/13/2002 5:22:29 PM PDT by ex-Texan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnFiorentino
The Iraqi officers came in after the Gulf war. Approximately 6,000 Iraqis were brought back from the Gulf, supposedly, because they would be killed by Hussein for aiding the enemy and surrendering prematurely. 2,000 were located in Lincoln, Nebraska and 4,000 in Oklahoma City. They were taken to Ft. Smith, Arkansas where they were involved in rioting and looting before being settled in the civilian sector.

Evidently Saddam was able to slip in some sabotuers and terrorists. There has been a problem ever since getting anybody to acknowlege the policy. I suppose it reflected on the incomplete end of the Gulf war during the first Bush administration. Then the hush-up of OK City connections during the Clinton term because for some reason, Clinton wanted to lay the connection onto the militia movement.

This whole episode has been known around Oklahoma City since the bombing but the media and Congress have avoided the issue. This issue continues to disrupt our policy today regarding the FBI and the war on terrorism as well as the Iraq situation.

While covering up the Iraqi connection in the bombing of the Murray building, we have those individuals out in the public ready to strike again. I have relatives in Oklahoma and have visited with them on the situation and their feelings at the betrayal of justice.

25 posted on 10/13/2002 5:39:58 PM PDT by meenie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: JohnFiorentino
Did you include the sinking of the Titanic?
26 posted on 10/13/2002 5:48:27 PM PDT by Doctor Don
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: stevem
I had David on my FreeRepublic Radio show a few months ago to discuss this. This event was what saved the Sinkmaster's butt and created the attack on the so-called vast right wing conspiracy. The bastard divided America to save himself. He did nothing after the first WTC attack, and the truth about this one would have finished him. He sickeningly turned it to his advantage.
27 posted on 10/13/2002 5:53:38 PM PDT by doug from upland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: meenie
Do you have any sources for this information?

Especially, the supposition that "Evidently Saddam was able to slip in some sabotuers and terrorists."

Hussein Al-Husseini, a former Iraqi soldier, may have been John Doe 2.

Timothy McVeigh, a former American soldier, was John Doe 1.

Do you get my point?
28 posted on 10/13/2002 5:56:37 PM PDT by logician2u
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: meenie
Clinton got a LOT of mileage out of the OKC bombing, blaming it on white supremacists, right-wing militias, Newt Gingrich, and even on conservative talk-show hosts. As Ambrose-Pritchard pointed out, it turned clinton's election campaign around and probably got him re-elected.

The last thing in the world he wanted was to pin it on Muslim terrorists. So the order went out, forget John Doe #2.

Bush, unfortunately, has shown himself to be absolutely unwilling to turn over any of the rocks under which clinton buried his bodies. I can see where Bush might not want to get personally involved, but he also seems to be reining in Ashcroft, the US Attorneys, and the FBI. No one is allowed to touch or badmouth clinton.

So, I don't think the OKC bombing, TWA 800, or the Vince Foster and Ron Brown murders are going to be solved anytime soon.
29 posted on 10/13/2002 5:58:43 PM PDT by Cicero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: backhoe
bump
30 posted on 10/13/2002 6:22:58 PM PDT by TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!
Earlier this month, TV station al-Jazeera aired an audio tape in which a voice attributed to bin Laden warned that the "youths of God" are planning more attacks against the US.....CNN

I am God connection?

31 posted on 10/13/2002 6:36:57 PM PDT by concerned about politics
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: concerned about politics
Good find I forgot about this.
32 posted on 10/13/2002 6:40:45 PM PDT by TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Lockbox
Yeah, and don't forget the convenient scapegoats for the bombing were the ememies of his third-way socialism: white Christian, independent, BOR thumpin' right wing whackos who voted Republican and called Clinton bad names.
"Hey! I can use this, hyuhk."
33 posted on 10/13/2002 6:49:09 PM PDT by dasboot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: concerned about politics
Where did you find this. I remember this in a thread, that believe it or not our post n run dude did not post..

Wanna start a thread of facts leading to the snipers being terrorists of OBL?

Ping me...I do not know if I have the energy tonight.

34 posted on 10/13/2002 6:49:42 PM PDT by TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: JohnFiorentino
If it were not for the graphic video of the left rear of Kennedy's head being blown out, I'd agree with you. I'd agree that we might not understand all of the mechanics of Oswald's shots in full, and accept that he did it. But the video I've seen convinces me that a bullet from the right front struck Kennedy. It appears to have blown out the left rear of his head, at the same time blowing his scalp out and back over the right forward side of his head. I will never understand how a shot from Oswald could have accomplished that. That being the case, I must consider at least two guns to have been involved. It seem to me to have been a conspiracy.
35 posted on 10/13/2002 6:51:35 PM PDT by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
Ditto
36 posted on 10/13/2002 6:52:37 PM PDT by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: TomServo
You are a bad American.
37 posted on 10/13/2002 6:56:20 PM PDT by RedBloodedAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
I don't know what video you are referring to. The Zapruder film has now been digitized, you may want to purchase that if you don't have it. In any event, there was NO disruption to the "left rear" of Kennedy's head.

A single bullet entered the rear of the head, slightly right and above the occipital protuberance. The bullet exited through the top of the head, with a large fragment exiting from the right parietal area, above the President's ear. That is the "flap" you are referring to.
38 posted on 10/13/2002 7:13:27 PM PDT by JohnFiorentino
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: JohnFiorentino
"I'M NOT A conspiracy guy." (caps yours)

Yahoo TWA800 forum - April 12, 2002
From: John Fiorentino
Subject: Re: [twa800] Kabofovic revisited
[excerpt][quote][emphasis added]
Most here are convinced a "missile" did the dirty deed. I'm not, not yet at least. The initial assessment was "bomb". I thought so to. I still do.
[end quote]

According to this, TEN metallurgists (four from the NTSB, three from Boeing, two from the FBI Laboratory, and one scientist consultant) found no evidence of a bomb (or missile) in the wreckage of TWA 800. Since you apparently disagree, do you believe they were incompetent or part of a coverup conspiracy?

39 posted on 10/13/2002 7:18:06 PM PDT by Asmodeus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Asmodeus
As usual Asmodeus, you can't get anything right. I didn't author the article of this thread. So your paste of:
"I'M NOT A conspiracy guy." (caps yours)....is in ERROR.

THE OKLAHOMA CITY -- 911 CONNECTION
http://twa800.com/news/mastalk-10-10-02.htm ^ | 10/13/02 | Michael Smerconish


Posted on 10/13/2002 7:03 PM Eastern by JohnFiorentino



The rest of your clap-trap is old news. Is this an example of your "EXPERT" witness analysis. If you worked for me, I'd fire your butt.
40 posted on 10/13/2002 7:26:32 PM PDT by JohnFiorentino
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-74 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson