Skip to comments.
Safire: Beltway Sniper Could Be Al Qaeda
NewsMax ^
| 10/14/02
| Limbacher
Posted on 10/14/2002 5:59:16 AM PDT by Tumbleweed_Connection
So far, speculation that the deadly Beltway sniper is anything but a domestic nutcase with his own twisted personal motives has been largely limited to talk radio and the Internet.
But in Monday's New York Times, renowned columnist William Safire argues that the eight gunshot deaths in the Washington, D.C. area in the last ten days may indeed be the work of Osama bin Laden's global terrorist network.
Though Safire notes that the evidence of an al Qaeda tie is thus far scant, he points out:
"The venue chosen by the most recent shooter is the capital of the U.S., a primary target of worldwide terrorism."
"Police have speculated that the sniper might well have an accomplice, perhaps a driver or supplier, which suggests a terrorist cell."
"The effect of the operation is to strike fear into ordinary Americans at the focal point of the nation's political decision-making and media coverage."
The Times scribe also observes that whether or not the attacks are the work of some global terrorist mastermind, "The stress that Israelis suffer every time they get on a bus is now hitting home to Washingtonians."
And if the deadly Beltway rampage turns out not to be the work of al Qaeda, bin Laden's plotters must be kicking themselves for not being the first to think of an operation of such ingenious simplicity, the conservative columnist says.
He then warns ominously:
"After this current spate of killings is ended, and even if, as expected, the relentless rampage turns out to have been the work of one or two crazies, the example will not be forgotten in the cells of al Qaeda. People in and near the world's great cities will be in danger of similar sieges instigated by terror networks."
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; US: District of Columbia; US: Maryland; US: Virginia
KEYWORDS: alqaeda; sniper
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-44 next last
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
If this were an al-quaeda terrorist, he'd be using an AK variant, not a .223 . People use what they train with.
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Another point that has been left out of most of the coverage is that as I understand it, AQ training manuals that were captured in Afghanistan have mentioned snipers in vans, and techniques related to sniping. I don't have a reference for this fact, but I do recall reading it somewhere.
To: Thornwell Simons
Wrong. People use what is available in gun stores, readily I might add, in the country in whcih they live. Ever see an AK in an OShman's??
4
posted on
10/14/2002 6:06:48 AM PDT
by
Indie
To: 2 Kool 2 Be 4-Gotten
Dang, Safire took the words right out of my mind. I'd been having exactly the same thoughts. If Al Queda isn't doing this, they may well be doing it soon. One shooter in DC is causing more casulties than half of the Taliban in Afghanistan!
5
posted on
10/14/2002 6:08:18 AM PDT
by
marktwain
To: 2 Kool 2 Be 4-Gotten
The sniper also shoots children, another al Queda trait.
He probably will go underground now and either resurface in 6 months or sooner in some other suburban area.
To: Thornwell Simons
"If this were an al-quaeda terrorist, he'd be using an AK variant, not a .223 . People use what they train with."Underestimating the terrorist threat is what caused us to suffer 9/11.
With all due respect, this sniper appears to be much more intelligent than the homicide bombers in Israel and the al-qaeda terrorists who flew planes into the World Trade Center and the Pentagon. After all he/she is apparently still alive and at-large after his attacks.
Taking the arrogant approach that an al-qaeda trained individual is not capable of being the sniper may turn out to be a gross error.
To: 2 Kool 2 Be 4-Gotten
The population should be encouraged to have arms and binoculars. At some point, these folks will make a mistake, and it would be good to have someone nearby who can capitalize on it.
8
posted on
10/14/2002 6:11:00 AM PDT
by
marktwain
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
I think someone involved in the shootings has access to a repair shop at a gas station. They can "borrow" the vehicles that are in the shop. They know how people behave at gas stations. They know the set-up of gas stations (surveillance cameras, etc.)
9
posted on
10/14/2002 6:12:30 AM PDT
by
syriacus
To: Tom Bombadil
"He probably will go underground now and either resurface in 6 months or sooner in some other suburban area."Perhaps he's using his weekend to travel to a different area.
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
I don't think any "holy warrior" would refer to himself as "God." That would be the ultimate blasphemy.
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
1. Even the police are saying it's not a lone nut, but at least 2 people. Makes it hard to keep quiet. If you've got two people chances are there's at least one other who at least sees what you're doing too. (For some reason the police aren't stressing that if you don't come forward you're part of the crime too as an accessory. For nuts, that would help flush them out, though terrorists would already know this and not respond.)
2. Tactics are not random. Easy one-shot kills, tactical discipline with one shot, locations selected for quick getaways even though busy public places, suggesting planning. Doesn't sound like nuts, could be AQ.
3. Other nut crimes just like this? Anywhere? The Unabomber is no analogy and anyway his family turned him in.
12
posted on
10/14/2002 6:13:59 AM PDT
by
pttttt
To: Thornwell Simons
If this were an al-quaeda terrorist, he'd be using an AK variant, not a .223 There is a .223 Kalashnikov (AK).
13
posted on
10/14/2002 6:15:15 AM PDT
by
F-117A
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
14
posted on
10/14/2002 6:18:09 AM PDT
by
blam
To: lady lawyer
"I don't think any "holy warrior" would refer to himself as "God." That would be the ultimate blasphemy. "They wouldn't go to strip joints and get drunk either...but they did.
To: Thornwell Simons
"If this were an al-quaeda terrorist, he'd be using an AK variant, not a .223 . People use what they train with."
If the sniper wants to avoid being caught, they will use the cleanest, most untraceable gun available which can get the job done. It may be in this case that a .223 was the most untraceable gun available to the perp which could accomplish the objective.
16
posted on
10/14/2002 6:19:52 AM PDT
by
joebuck
To: syriacus
Lots of Arabs work at such places no?
17
posted on
10/14/2002 6:21:48 AM PDT
by
crz
To: Mark Felton
They have a much more laissez-faire attitude about those kinds of things. They can traffic with non-Muslim women. And drunkenness is a "human weakness" that God forgives pretty easily. But blasphemy of that sort would be against bedrock beliefs.
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
The

is online. You can read the outline there that shows the recommended behaviors of Al-qaeda cell members. Anyone who's read it before might like to take a quick look at it again.
It's not a very long read, and it's pretty interesting.
19
posted on
10/14/2002 6:32:19 AM PDT
by
syriacus
To: lady lawyer
All the more reason to employ it. The idea for this commando is NOT to get caught.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-44 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson