Then they can use road blocks, gun dogs, test for residues, and require all politicians who seek office to take residue tests. That would stop all this silliness about a so called “right to kill.”
Gun grabbers will take good hardworking law abiding men and women all to hell rather than work to punish the lawbreaking evil doers.
Many gun grabbers would march in protest against the war on Saddam and at the same time work to disarm lawful American citizens.
I wonder too, just what these gun grabbers would do if it were their own families at risk, or even themselves? I do realize that some of the biggest gun grabbing fanatics are themselves protected by massive security personnel, so are they erecting themselves into an aristocratic class where the peasants get sticks and brooms to protect themselves from the whims of the aristocratics and evil doers?
Would the results be the same if say these killers tried this in say, Montana?
IMO the folks in a rural state are more likely to have a firearm than a cell phone. Instead of calling 911 they are likely to return fire.
Just call them the Brady Borg - for their amazing ability to all be bleating the same propaganda simulataneously - must have some pretty significant orchestration behind the scenes for them all to be using the same buzzwords, the same attacks, all within hours of Sarah Brady issuing her position on the matter.
Congressman Billybob
"Moreover, there are two states that already require ballistic fingerprinting -- New York and Maryland. In case anybody forgot, Maryland is where these shootings began. If ballistic fingerprinting is so effective, then why isn't the Beltway Sniper already behind bars?
"That's easy. As I said, the technology is faulty. The CSGV knows this, and they also know that such a requirement would do nothing to aid in the apprehension of killers. But, a national database of guns would be the first step toward a national database of gun owners."
Replacing irrational political-agenda law with honest objective law:
"Fleischer went on to say... "In the case of the sniper, the real issue is values. These are the acts of a depraved killer who has broken and will continue to break laws, so the question is not new laws.""