Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: E. Pluribus Unum
Fuji Film surpassed Kodak many years ago.

Kodak got artsey-cutesy (maybe now we know why) with differing types of cameras and film whereas Fuji stuck to improving the standards.

This story is just another example of internal problems at Kodak.
18 posted on 10/21/2002 12:03:56 PM PDT by Vidalia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Vidalia
...Fuji stuck to improving the standards.

Those homophobic bastards! Competing on the basis of product quality instead of political correctness is illegal. They should be prosecuted!

26 posted on 10/21/2002 12:14:23 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: Vidalia
There's Agfa film as well, which is harder to come by in the US than Kodak or Fuji, but is nice as well. I've personally found it to be the most accurate film I've used, and it doesn't have the harshness of color that some Fuji films can tend to exhibit.

Even though the digital cameras out there are 5+ megapixel now, they still can't match an SLR with a negative scanner. Until that day, I'll be shooting both.
107 posted on 10/21/2002 8:02:55 PM PDT by July 4th
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson