Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Non-Sequitur
I’m disappointed to see you live up to your name. On one hand you say it isn’t his fault. Then you seemingly contradict that by saying it “happened on his watch” & “democrats will be able to hang this on him.” Its sad to think you want a small, limited government and then you see these people politicize the economy that the people are supposed to own and manage and go crying that the government or more specifically one man should fix it.
7 posted on 10/22/2002 8:43:53 AM PDT by Republican_Strategist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: Republican_Strategist
Well, I don't think that it was his fault. The bubble would have burst regardless of who won in 2000. But the electorate has a habit of blaming whoever was in charge at the time. As for me, I'll watch the economy and Bush's policies and make a decision based on how I feel he's done. But I'm just me, not the rest of the voters out there. And if the economy doesn't show improvement by 2004 then Bush will no doubt hang for it like his father before him.
8 posted on 10/22/2002 8:50:09 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Republican_Strategist
On one hand you say it isn’t his fault. Then you seemingly contradict that by saying it “happened on his watch” & “democrats will be able to hang this on him.”

How is that contradictory? The Clintonistas were able to hang the government shutdown on Newt and the gang. Don't confuse truth with Dem propaganda, the two seldom if ever agree...

10 posted on 10/22/2002 8:58:13 AM PDT by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson