To: Non-Sequitur
Im disappointed to see you live up to your name. On one hand you say it isnt his fault. Then you seemingly contradict that by saying it happened on his watch & democrats will be able to hang this on him. Its sad to think you want a small, limited government and then you see these people politicize the economy that the people are supposed to own and manage and go crying that the government or more specifically one man should fix it.
To: Republican_Strategist
Well, I don't think that it was his fault. The bubble would have burst regardless of who won in 2000. But the electorate has a habit of blaming whoever was in charge at the time. As for me, I'll watch the economy and Bush's policies and make a decision based on how I feel he's done. But I'm just me, not the rest of the voters out there. And if the economy doesn't show improvement by 2004 then Bush will no doubt hang for it like his father before him.
To: Republican_Strategist
On one hand you say it isnt his fault. Then you seemingly contradict that by saying it happened on his watch & democrats will be able to hang this on him. How is that contradictory? The Clintonistas were able to hang the government shutdown on Newt and the gang. Don't confuse truth with Dem propaganda, the two seldom if ever agree...
10 posted on
10/22/2002 8:58:13 AM PDT by
dirtboy
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson