Islam Permits Killing of Prisoners (Chechen website via MEMRI)

Middle East Media Research Institute (MEMRI) ^ | Oct 26, 2002 | staff

[polemikos]

Pro-Chechen Islamist Website: Islamic Religious Interpretation Permits Killing of Prisoners

On the Islamic internet site www.qoqaz.com which is hostile towards the Russians, and is probably run by Chechens, there are a number of unsigned articles which deal with Islam’s position towards prisoners. Drawing upon Islamic religious sources; e.g., the Koran and its interpretations as well as other traditions about the Prophet’s conduct, the articles advocate a position which permits the killing of prisoners if their killing benefits the Muslims. The following are the main elements in the articles:

“A Guide to the Perplexed about the Permissibility of Killing Prisoners”

In an article titled “A Guide to the Perplexed Regarding the Permissibility of Killing Prisoners,” which appeared in the column “Jihad News from the Land of the Caucasus⁽¹⁾” the author suggests that the Islamic religious scholars present five different alternatives, drawn from the various interpretations of the Koran:

1) A polytheist prisoner must be killed. No amnesty may be granted to him, nor can he be ransomed.
2) All infidel polytheists and the People of the Book (i.e., Jews and Christians) are to be killed. They may not be granted amnesty, nor can they be ransomed.
3) Amnesty and ransom are the only two ways to deal with prisoners.
4) Amnesty and ransom are possible only after the killing of a large number of prisoners.
5) The Imam, or someone acting on his behalf, can choose between killing, amnesty, ransom or enslaving the prisoner.

Killing a Prisoner for the Sins of Others is Permissible

The last position is the one preferred by the author who explained that the Prophet Muhammad had dealt with the prisoners in different ways to maximize the benefits to Muslims.

He gives examples regarding the methods that the Prophet Muhammad had chosen to kill, grant amnesty, or ransom prisoners.

The author finds it necessary to present the subject in reaction to an Islamic criticism “which had torn his heart” about the execution of nine [Russian] prisoners after the Russian Government had refused to surrender “one of Russia’s biggest criminals and crooks.”

According to the author, [the Chechens] have executed the prisoners not because of their heart’s desire, but because they have seen a benefit for the Muslims in such an act.

In reaction to the arguments made by some critics that no one should be punished for the sins of others, the author maintains that Allah permits the killing of a prisoner because he is a prisoner, and all the more so if his killing for the sins of others serves an important Islamic interest, as well as a deterrent (to the enemy). He brings examples from actions of the Prophet. A state of war justifies actions of the sort that could guarantee the security of the soldiers of Islam. Moreover, only with such action is it possible to protect the honor of Muslims.⁽²⁾

In an article titled “Are Hostages Prisoners?” the author explains the concept of “hostages” in its modern application to local kidnapped individuals and foreigners who are held as a means of pressure to achieve specific goals. According to him, he who was kidnapped in accordance with Islamic law should be considered a hostage, and hence a prisoner, who should be treated in the manner that would bring benefits to the Muslims.⁽³⁾

Endnotes:
(1) In an article titled “Prisoners in Islam” the author indicates that there are five methods that Islam proposes for dealing with prisoners: release without ransom, ransom, killing, enslavement or subjugation to the authority of the Islamic state. The method changes according to circumstances but it has to be one that brings the greatest benefits to Muslims. For example, if amongst the prisoners there is someone who is strong and is likely to tantalize the Muslims and his keeping alive may cause harm to them, his killing will be the preferred method. If there is someone who is weak but wealthy, ransoming him is the best method. If there is someone who holds a favorable view of Muslims and could help them and their prisoners, amnesty is the best method. If there are those who could render a service, such as women and children, enslavement is the best method. http://www.qoqaz.com/qoqaz.asp?9=4&pp=1&sec=7
(2) http://www.qoqaz.com/qoqaz.asp?p=4
(3) http://www.qoqaz.com/qoqaz.asp?p=4&pp=1&sec=8

[weikel]

They had the same thing on Azzam before our own JohnathanRGalt got it. Looks like it reincarnated.

[NotJustAnotherPrettyFace]

Islam .......... the religion of peace. Yeah sure.....

[meenie]

Where do they get the idea that Islam is a violent religion? Just because the Koran and Mohammed advocate the killing of infidels, everybody knows they are such peaceful people. It is just coincidental that the Palestinians are suicide bombers, the Chechens threaten to kill their hostages, Al Qaeda crashes planes into skyscrapers killing thousands, and our own personal sniper turns out to be a black Muslim.

In spite of this, our government insists they are so peaceful and it is racial prejudice to profile them. Is anyone else getting tired of turning the other cheek? I sure am.

[samtheman]

I wonder who is more famous in America.

Mohammed the Prophet, or Mohammed the Sniper?

[Asclepius]

... Moreover, only with such action is it possible to protect the honor of Muslims ...

Honor?! The issue is killing prisoners, people who are by definition unarmed and in your power. You surrender any claim to honor the moment you consider killing a prisoner.

We are at war with barbarians.

[I still care]

Someone posted an article from "Ask the Imam" that basically said that moslems could get female sex slaves from captured "infidels".

[nmh]

Nah, can't be. George Bush has said that they are peace loving people. George Bush wouldn't lie, now would he? ;)

[kcar]

6) If still in doubt, kill them.

Peaceful religion there.

[nmh]

"Where do they get the idea that Islam is a violent religion? Just because the Koran and Mohammed advocate the killing of infidels, everybody knows they are such peaceful people. It is just coincidental that the Palestinians are suicide bombers, the Chechens threaten to kill their hostages, Al Qaeda crashes planes into skyscrapers killing thousands, and our own personal sniper turns out to be a black Muslim."

"In spite of this, our government insists they are so peaceful and it is racial prejudice to profile them. Is anyone else getting tired of turning the other cheek? I sure am."

Tired is an understatement! What's worse is our lovely George Bush has an undergraduate degree in History. He knows, dam well that these are evil, barbaric people. Their "religion" condones what they do.

Clinton used the WH as a revolving fun raiser courtesy of the Lincoln bedroom. Bush had a prayer vigil with these evil Muslims. Endorisn evil isn't something only the demoncrats do.

[Fiddlstix]

Wow! This post is an eye opener!
....from the religion of peace

[dcwusmc]

You GOTTA be wrong. CAIR says so. Who would know better than a muslim whether or not they are peaceful? You HAFTA believe them, why would they LIE to us? {projectile vomiting here!}