To: davidosborne
Thanks, David! Very helpful! I think I disagree with the Wells retention, though. He was complicit in the original unanimous decision, as I recall, but dissented on the second one, probably because he knew he was coming up for retention. Besides, he was appointed by Chiles and I'd love to see him out and one of Jeb's picks in...
5 posted on
10/31/2002 2:38:56 PM PST by
mrtoby
To: mrtoby
The U.S. Supreme Court essentially adopted WELLS dissent in the final stages of the Bush v. Gore, 2000 Presidential Case.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson