Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: davidosborne
Thanks, David! Very helpful! I think I disagree with the Wells retention, though. He was complicit in the original unanimous decision, as I recall, but dissented on the second one, probably because he knew he was coming up for retention. Besides, he was appointed by Chiles and I'd love to see him out and one of Jeb's picks in...
5 posted on 10/31/2002 2:38:56 PM PST by mrtoby
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: mrtoby
The U.S. Supreme Court essentially adopted WELLS dissent in the final stages of the Bush v. Gore, 2000 Presidential Case.
9 posted on 10/31/2002 2:45:38 PM PST by davidosborne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson