[Glenn]

If you are foolish enough to sign on the dotted line, you accept the consequences.

[BlackbirdSST]

If you are foolish enough to sign on the dotted line, you accept the consequences. What a "foolish" statement. Blackbird.

[POhara71]

The smoking was just an excuse to fire this guy. He had drugs in his car and was driving erratically. They were probably trying to help him out by using that as the excuse and not narcotics possession.
However... not smoking, even at home, as a condition of employment is a violation of privacy even if the employment is conditional. By allowing that you essentially say your employer can come into your home unannounced to make sure you are living up to the agreed stipulation of employment at any time.
And I would like to point one more thing out...how the hell can you tell a fireman not to smoke?? If the boneheads that passed this understood how many toxins fireman inhaled over the course of their career they would not think of passing this redundant crap. If you want fireman to protect their lungs, pay them not to go to fires and let them worry about their smoking habits