Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: berned
If one wants to claim the "brother of Jesus" part was a HOAX, one must postulate WHEN the supposed "hoax" was done... last month? Last YEAR? 20 years ago? 200 years ago?

Exactly! That was my point also, see #6.

Odd that the Catholics venerate the Shroud of Turin, an obvious fake and contradiction of the Bible, but are having a hissy-fit over this, which agrees with the Bible.

I'm not too surprised the thing was nearly destroyed. I'm sure it's going to be.

Hank

18 posted on 11/02/2002 5:44:39 AM PST by Hank Kerchief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: Hank Kerchief
Odd that the Catholics venerate the Shroud of Turin, an obvious fake and contradiction of the Bible, but are having a hissy-fit over this, which agrees with the Bible.

Odd that so many reject the Shroud despite the evidence that it is authentic but accept the Ossuary which doesn't prove any geneology at all. It's also humorous to watch the Protestant clamor considering that Calvin, Luther, Zwingli Wesley and many others all believed in, wrote and preached about the perpetual virginity of the Blessed Virgin Mary.

Please provide those passages of Scripture that state the Blessed Virgin Mary gave birth to other children or that the "brothers" and "sisters" of Jesus are called the "sons and daughters" of Mary. The linguistic literalists get tripped up again.

20 posted on 11/02/2002 6:24:40 AM PST by SMEDLEYBUTLER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson