Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

11/3 Zogby Poll Final Numbers (Some Shockers)
Meet The Press | 11/03/02 | Zogby

Posted on 11/03/2002 9:01:54 AM PST by Ed_in_LA

Minn: Mondale 50% Coleman 45%

TX: Kirk 48% Cornyn 49%

NJ: Lautenberg 54% Forrester 38%

Ark: Pryor 51% 40%

SD: Johnson 52% Thune 47%

GA: Cleland 49% Chambliss 49%

CO: Strickland 53% Allard 44%

NC: Bowles 46% Dole 52%

FL Gov: McBride 42% Bush 57%


TOPICS: Extended News; Front Page News; Politics/Elections; US: Arkansas; US: Colorado; US: Florida; US: Georgia; US: Minnesota; US: Missouri; US: New Jersey; US: North Carolina; US: South Dakota; US: Texas
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 301-304 next last
To: ForGod'sSake
Good catch. I think the Linked site has it backwards.... I can't get confirmation from POA as their site doesn't repsond now.

NEWSMAX Article
POA Final Poll: Bush 49%, Gore 40%

NewsMax.com
Tuesday, Nov. 7, 2000
The final Portrait of America poll shows George W. Bush leading Al Gore by nine points, 49 percent to 40 percent.
201 posted on 11/03/2002 12:17:59 PM PST by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies]

To: Doctor Mongo
He is Arab, isn't he? Isn't his brother active anti-Israel?
202 posted on 11/03/2002 12:18:23 PM PST by mathluv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: For the Unborn
And wasn't it FOX that had a round table last weekend that said Mondale hands down without even a hint that this could change?

I think I missed that one; musta been napping or something. I presume this was before the very somber funerally???

FGS

203 posted on 11/03/2002 12:18:53 PM PST by ForGod'sSake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 193 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
You guys raise a good point. I didn't realize he had a brother. Perhaps that is who I saw in the mentioned interview

Both brothers have somewhat dark complexion and wear glasses. The pollster has a fuller face, kind of Russert like while his brother seems thinner. While neither have full heads of hair, the pollster has longer hair and is fuller while his brother has shorter hair and seems more bald if I remember correctly. The pollster seems more cheerful while the arab cheer leader seems unhappy.

204 posted on 11/03/2002 12:19:15 PM PST by Dave S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 184 | View Replies]

To: jraven
So we blast a pollster if his results aren't what we want?

What's this "we" business? You're not a conservative. You are a liberal disruptor. Oh, and if you are looking for hypocrisy, head back over to DU. You'll won't be disappointed!

205 posted on 11/03/2002 12:19:15 PM PST by stands2reason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Dave S
at the same time "fair sex" isn't an indicator that you want a divorce from her (or that you want to toss an incumbent out) :P

Personally, I'd put Bush in the "fair" category but I'd never, ever vote a Democrat above him. He's done a terrible job of keeping the government smaller and in implementing a fiscally conservative platform; but what can I say, lesser of two evils and all that.

And I think that is what the "fair" category represents to a lot of voters--the lesser of two evils. Can you see Davis getting a lot of "excellent" or "good" nods? Yet he's going to be winning in a cakewalk.
206 posted on 11/03/2002 12:20:19 PM PST by Nataku X
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 198 | View Replies]

To: Holden Magroin
Don't be so sure. Jeb might get 57%.
207 posted on 11/03/2002 12:21:38 PM PST by ItisaReligionofPeace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: Timesink
But I've yet to see one article giving any reason why we should be expecting it, beyond the usual RAT knock-and-drags they give to blacks as if they were subhuman.

Check out MSNBC website (near the bottom, it maybe part they share with Washington Post online). They had two articles on turnout today. One discussed the major effort the Dems were putting out. The other was on minority turnout and quoted some dems that were concerned that minority turnout might not be that great because the campaigns were targeted towards issues that were more important to suburban elites such as abortion, the environment, and judges than on jobs and safety net programs.

208 posted on 11/03/2002 12:23:06 PM PST by Dave S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies]

To: OldFriend
A woman attorney was polled by Zogby and recognized 'leading' questions. She called Sean and then he rushed to call Zogby to give him a chance to rebut and he COULDN'T.

We need more information. Was this an independent Zogby poll? Or was it a private poll commissioned by one of the campaigns? If the latter, leading questions wouldn't be a shock.

209 posted on 11/03/2002 12:24:28 PM PST by BlackRazor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 200 | View Replies]

To: Ed_in_LA
Sounds like the Democrats are planning MASSIVE vote fraud.

Only one thing will save us:

POLL WATCHERS! POLL WATCHERS! POLL WATCHERS! POLL WATCHERS! POLL WATCHERS! POLL WATCHERS!

210 posted on 11/03/2002 12:25:55 PM PST by B Knotts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BlackRazor
The numbers behind the Mason Dixon and Star Tribune Polls in Minnesota showing opposite results on Mondale/Colman senate race:

http://www.twincities.com/mld/twincities/news/local/4431486.htm
211 posted on 11/03/2002 12:28:30 PM PST by ncweaver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: OldFriend
A woman attorney was polled by Zogby and recognized 'leading' questions. She called Sean and then he rushed to call Zogby to give him a chance to rebut and he COULDN'T.

There is the syndicated polling that he sells to all, and there is the custom polling he does for candidates and the media. The type of questioning will differ. Some times parties or interest groups will want a certain result so the questions are framed a certain way to give them a better shot at what they want. This is seldom done for candidates because they want to win on election day, not in the press.

212 posted on 11/03/2002 12:28:44 PM PST by Dave S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 200 | View Replies]

To: deport
Thank you!
213 posted on 11/03/2002 12:32:10 PM PST by anncoulteriscool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies]

To: deport
Fer cryin' out loud; I don't remember POA coming in with those numbers at the end. Looking back, IF I had seen numbers like that, I would likely have discounted 'em. What I remember was POA and Zogby running fairly close until near the election. I could be wrong on that too... Sheesh; ain't life wonderful.

FGS

214 posted on 11/03/2002 12:33:27 PM PST by ForGod'sSake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies]

To: ForGod'sSake
*****Hey deport, have you got it backwards??? If we're lookin' at the same numbers, Rasmussen had Al Snore @ 49%; Bush @ 40%. Maybe I'm on the wrong page...*****

Your wrong!

215 posted on 11/03/2002 12:33:49 PM PST by anncoulteriscool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies]

To: ForGod'sSake
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOKAY!!!!!!! If you say so...HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
216 posted on 11/03/2002 12:35:13 PM PST by anncoulteriscool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies]

To: Nakatu X; Dave S
Two Polls... Zog and Harris use the groupings of
Excellent/Good
Fair/Poor

Here's a link to their Clinton ratings using those groupings....

http://www.pollingreport.com/clinton-.htm

217 posted on 11/03/2002 12:35:59 PM PST by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 183 | View Replies]

To: ForGod'sSake
POA had GW ahead for a long time - maybe two months - by 2-3 points, then opened up in the last two weeks until, during the last week, they had GW by 7-9 points. I remember it well - I made an ass of myself with my predictions of a Republican landslide.
218 posted on 11/03/2002 12:38:55 PM PST by wienerdog.com
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 214 | View Replies]

To: Dave S
I believe that Zogby has been stringing along Golisano with high poll numbers (Zogby is Golisano's pollster).
219 posted on 11/03/2002 12:39:02 PM PST by ambrose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 212 | View Replies]

To: wienerdog.com
POA had GW ahead for a long time - maybe two months - by 2-3 points, then opened up in the last two weeks until, during the last week, they had GW by 7-9 points.

I must have completely ingored the latest numbers; maybe not believing 'em or whatever. Odd but entirely possible.

I remember it well - I made an ass of myself with my predictions of a Republican landslide.

Har! I was predicting big win for "W", and truth be known, discounting the mischief, I still believe he would have won big. There was just too much tinkering at the very end for there not to be some creativity by the Dims. Of course several close states that "W" probably won would have been a decisive win...

FGS

220 posted on 11/03/2002 12:48:01 PM PST by ForGod'sSake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 218 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 301-304 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson