[Nancie Drew]

Honway,

You still seem to have a lot of concern about the Grand Jury’s proceedings and Jayna’s cooperation.

I will state again that when Jayna went before the Grand Jury in 1997, all the information on the prior warning was presented to them.

Also, let me address her witnesses and the Grand Jury. Let me start with a portion of a posting I did on another thread:

“An Internet search showed an interview that McCauley did for a Boston radio station called the connection. Twenty-eight minutes into the program she says the following, ‘Even after the inspector general’s report an FBI agent went before an Oklahoma County Grand Jury and continued to give wrong information.’ She would be referring to John Hersley because he was the agent dispatched to go before the Grand Jury.”


Jayna found a way to get the names to the Grand Jury without breaching confidentiality. The witnesses voluntarily gave their names to the DAs office and the Grand Jury along with a notarized statement outlining what they knew. Before those witnesses were called, John Hersley evidently gave false testimony about Jayna’s witnesses to the Grand Jury. I do not know whether Hersley did this knowingly or whether someone in the FBI misled him.


The World Net Daily article quotes Jayna:

“Davis said ‘at no time in the past seven years have my witnesses changed one word of their testimonies.’

In fact, she said, some witnesses claim the FBI falsified some of their statements.
‘I have in my possession several FBI interview statements formally known as '302s' that the witnesses contend contain falsified information that radically altered their positive identifications of Middle Eastern men in the commission of the terrorist strike on America's heartland’”


Hersley may have had those 302’s that Jayna is referring to and presented those to the Grand Jury or referred to them. The Grand Jury evidently chose to believe Hersley. Jayna did not know until years later what had happened to the Grand Jury. When she was getting ready to testify in a court of law about her efforts to get this information into the right hands, she was given legal access to Hersley’s testimony because it was about her.

[Nancie Drew]

See Reply #44

[thinden]

John Hersley evidently gave false testimony about Jayna’s witnesses to the Grand Jury.

isn't giving false testimony to a grand jury a felony?

what is the statute of limitations on this?

[Fred Mertz]

Jayna did not know until years later what had happened to the Grand Jury. When she was getting ready to testify in a court of law about her efforts to get this information into the right hands, she was given legal access to Hersley’s testimony because it was about her.

The feds sure are tricksters aren't they? Thanks for the additional details Nancie Drew.

[honway]

From the Grand Jury:

"However, we have not been presented with or uncovered information sufficient to indict any additional conspirators."

[honway]

Before those witnesses were called, John Hersley evidently gave false testimony about Jayna’s witnesses to the Grand Jury

Wasn't Hersley the last major witness before the Grand Jury?

[honway]

From Daily Oklahoman's Diana Baldwin, Judy Kuhlman

Davis, testifying for the third time, said she has refused to name her sources.

A reasonable person could conclude that Jayna Davis told Diana Baldwin and/or Judy Kuhlman that she refused to name her sources.

---------------------------------------------------

From Nancie:

The witnesses voluntarily gave their names to the DAs office and the Grand Jury along with a notarized statement outlining what they knew

A reasonable person could conclude that Jayna Davis told Nancie Drew that she named her sources to the Grand Jury.

-------------------------------------------------------

Nancie, I have never questioned your integritity or your sincerity and I am not going to start now. Having said that, do you see a pattern emerging here relative to our past correspondence? I do.