[RetiredArmy]

Interesting thoughts from Boortz today. Go to his site to see his photo of him and President Bush I at Texas A&M this past weekend. Boortz was invited down to the game and while walking around President Bush's library gounds, ran into the ex-Prez and had his photo taken.

[TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!]

--Two simple reasons why the Republicans won.--

1) The DNC and the Clinton King and Queen were effectively told by the American people....

WERE NOT GONNA TAKE,NO! WERE NOT GONNA TAKE IT...ANYMORE

NO MORE LIES, HATRED, CORRUPTION AND EMBARRASMENT!!!

LOOK AT THE DIFFERENCE IN THE TWO PARTIES AND IT IS A NO-BRAINER AS TO WHY THE DNC LOST!

2)

THE RNC WEB PAGE

THE DNC WEB PAGE

THE DIFFERENCE IS APPARENT...THE RNC HAS CLASS AND MORALS AND AN AGENDA THE MAJORITY OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE WANT. THE DNC ARE A BUNCH OF CHILDISH, WHINY LOSERS, THAT DO NOTHING BUT BASH OTHERS ON THEIR WEB PAGE!

[TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!]

[TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!]

AMERICA WISED UP AND BOUGHT A HUMONGOUS CONTAINER OF DRAINO AFTER CUTTING THROUGH THE DEMS SNOW PLUMB JOB WITH CHAIN SAWS. THE $HIT HAS BEEN ALL CLEARED!

[TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!]

[Common Tator]

EXTREMISTS!

I certainly hope so!

Extremism is the act the Democrats started in 1964 and it worked against Barry Goldwater. It just worlked against Bill Simon. this year. No where else. Certainly not on the national scene.

It will not work against Dubya Bush. People like Dubya. They like him more than Clinton. They like him more than Al Gore. When anyone looks at Dubya the last thing that comes to their mind is extremists. Nice Guy in control and doing what is right... is what comes to mind when people look at Dubya.

Look at our Repubican national leaders. Does Rummy look like an extremist? Hardly. What about Powell? Does he look like an extremist? And that nastly ole Cheney takes kindhearted niceness to new extremes.

Then how about Lott or Hastert pr the head of the RNC.

How about our leading senators? Do they look like extremeists?

Most of the complaints on FR are about the panty waist roll over wimps that are the Republican leadership. No one but Carville thinks they are extreme.

Fat ugly girls should never claim that pretty girls are ugly. It just draws attention to a beauty contest they can't win.

[Eva]

I have been saying for the past couple of days that the truth of the reason that the Democrat party was unable to to openly articulate their agenda is because they could not admit to the US voters that their agenda was one of world socialism, The Third Way. So, they tried to sneak it in through the backdoor, calling it Progressivism.

This meant that they had to break the issues down into various special interest movements, such as slavery reparations, abortion rights and hate crime legislation.

They couldn't admit what their plans for the economy were because they didn't include anything that would aid the capitalist system that we now enjoy. In fact the Democrat agenda included items such as the Kyoyo treaty, which would have further dampened the economy.

The far left wing of the Democrat party opposed Homeland Security and the War on Terror because they would like to see the US subjugated to a world government, which would further milk our economy by subjecting US companies to world taxes.

Is it any wonder that the Democrat Party were such big losers in last week's election?

[ctnoell]

Just another double standard, when it comes to describing political parties or religious views, only conservatives are "extremists, zealots, religious fanatics", while liberals get by with benign labels such as "moderate, progressive, tolerant, inclusive". But that's okay, because those who really count spoke on November 5 and made a clear, "extremist" statement. Those on the left will have to learn to live with this for the next two years!

[Billthedrill]

Yeah, "extreme" was the word of the day for the libs - yesterday a story on Patty Murray (ptui!) quoted her pre-election speech with that locution prominently featured. The problem is that in the absence of alternative plans, the one proposed isn't "extreme" at all, it's the only game in town. And the Dems were notably short of alternative plans, and found that simply labeling the only ones going as "extreme" wasn't, predictably, enough.

[nicmarlo]

BTTT

[G Larry]

Whenever a conservative encounters the "extreme" label this should be the response:

Why is it considered "extreme" to want to save babies,
but to accept their killing is labled "mainstream"?

[js1138]

I've heard there are "snapshots" of the internet as it was in the past. Anybody know anything about this? It would be interesting to document Boortz's claims.

[tamikamaria]

bump for a later read

[Burkeman1]

The modus operendi of democratts in politics against Republicans is two fold- call us "extremeist", "ultra right wing", "religious right"- etc- etc. And call us "dumb". Ever notice how every single Republican in the last 50 years is always "stupid" to the media and the Democrats? Eisenhower- stupid. Nixon- stupid and mean. Ford- stupid (maybe the only one in which it was true), Reagan- very stupid and dangerously so. Bush Senior- a babbling wimpy idiot, and Bush Junior- dumb. Meanwhile every Democratic candidate has been "too smart" to be President. Adalai Stevenson- was an intellectual "collosus". Kennedy was a genius, Johnson was said to be an voracious reader. And of course Gore's problem was that he was just so damned smart that he scarred voters with his mighty intellect!

Democrats never debate issues- they simpley call us either "extreme" or "stupid" or both. There are some bright and intelligent Republicans to the media and to Democrats. But guess who they always turn out to be? Liberal NorthEast Republicans like Jeffords, Chaffe, Whitman, and Snow- who have liberal voting and governing records more liberal than most Democrats. A good case study is to see the portrayal of Packwood in the media when he was their pet "maverick" showcase Republican and then see how they reffered to him after his scandal. Before- he was brilliant- well read- articulate- had an "amazing mind" blah blah- afterwards he was described as a simplton and a vulgarian and a very shallow thinker. These descriptions were taken from the same papers and these descriptions were seperated by only a few years and in some cases months.

When you have the major media doing your work for you for 50 years you lose the ability to debate or even honestly see your opponents stengths and weaknesses. This- in the long run has really turned out to the benefit of the GOP.