Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

South Park Rising
TechCentralStation ^ | 11/14/2002 | Stephen W. Stanton

Posted on 11/15/2002 6:22:37 AM PST by hchutch

A recent column titled "South Park Republicans" challenged conservative stereotypes by suggesting that a many Republican voters are more inclined to watch Comedy Central than the Christian Broadcasting Network. The piece struck a chord. Actually, it struck several. You can read the reaction for yourself by doing a Google search for "South Park Republicans." Responses range from enthusiastic support to outright ridicule.

A few clarifications are in order. First, not all viewers of "South Park" are Republicans. Certainly, not all of Barbara Streisand's listeners are steadfast Democrats. And the concept of South Park Republicans is not new. Back in 2000, an article was published detailing The Inherent Conservatism of "South Park". The term "South Park Republicans" was first coined by Andrew Sullivan.

Some readers rightly noted that there is not necessarily a dichotomy between South Park Republicans and the Christian right. According to the official South Park website, "members of the Christian right have condemned the show for being bad for practically anyone who wants to go to heaven." However, many Christian conservatives agree with their more secular brethren on the issues of smaller government, lower taxes, fewer regulations, and personal responsibility. Indeed, many conservative Christians responded favorably to the article. One reader began her supportive email, "As a twenty-something, conservative, Christian who appreciates the humor of South Park…"

Many readers tried to debunk the existence of South Park Republicans based on a simple equation: Republican minus religion equals libertarian (they insist on a lowercase "L"). The logic is reminiscent of those demanding that "Jews for Jesus" call themselves plain old Christians. (Too many "J" words, evidently.) More importantly, not all South Park Republicans are libertarians. There is no single "South Park Republican" platform. They have different views on drugs, guns, abortion and Social Security. In addition, South Park Republicans are not uppercase Libertarians for one simple reason. They vote for Republicans. In fact, voting Republican is one of the group's two defining characteristics.

The other defining characteristic is a visible disconnect from the stereotypical Republican, an affluent, religious, white, male, moralist. In contrast, South Park Republicans can be any age, any color and any religion. Unlike archetypal Christian conservatives, they do not find much of modern pop culture offensive. In fact, they love it. They enjoy the non-Christian mysticism of Star Wars, the acrobatic violence of Jackie Chan, and the comedic vulgarity of Chris Tucker. The Christian right observes pop culture. South Park Republicans live pop culture, invoking movie quotes in casual conversation far more often than the Lord's name.

In this respect, South Park Republicans are a far cry from Rod Dreher's "granola conservatives." Dreher, who writes for the conservative National Review, admits that he has "a disdain for, or at least a healthy suspicion of, mass culture." South Park Republicans do not disdain mass culture because they are mass culture. Sure, some SPR's eat free-range chicken and organic vegetables like Dreher, but as a group, they are more likely to eat at Taco Bell. To the extent there is an overlap at all, granola conservatives represent a small fraction of South Park Republicans.

Different South Park Republicans often describe themselves as conservatives, libertarians, classical liberals, pragmatists, constitutionalists, or "just your average Joe." However, when election day comes around, they all generally vote for Republican candidates. But their vote must be earned. They are idealists, perhaps even pragmatists, but not party loyalists. In fact, the creators of the South Park TV show brutally satirized the current president in their short-lived series, "That's My Bush."

What's Under the Tent?

South Park Republicans each vote Republican for their own reasons. Some agree with every plank in the party's platform, in spite of having a nose ring and purple mohawk. However, most view Republicans as the lesser of two evils. Due to the quirks of our electoral system, candidates require a plurality to win, not a majority. If Libertarians wrested away half of the Republican votes in every major election, Democrats would hold nearly every seat in Congress. South Park Republicans want to avoid that, even if it means voting for Republicans when third party candidates may better reflect their views.

Democrats are keenly aware of electoral calculus. Long ago, they assembled an unlikely coalition to exploit it. For decades, Democrats have held their multifaceted party together with tape and glue. Today, former Klansman and current Senator Robert Byrd is in the same party as African-American Georgia Rep. Billy McKinney, who blamed his daughter's congressional defeat on a Jewish plot, though he did not mention Jewish Democrats by name, such as former Democratic VP candidate Joe Lieberman. Democrats hold together environmentalists protesting big oil in the same party as the union auto workers who depend on cheap oil and even the trial lawyers that skim 30% from whichever side wins. The Democrats have room for almost everybody in their big tent.

When you lift the flap to peek inside, who will you see in the Republican tent? After looking at the ad hoc membership of the left, it becomes easy to accept the South Park crowd as a viable Republican caucus, numerically dwarfing other factions such as, say, the Log Cabin Republicans. Of course, with congressional control and a sitting president, there must be far more people - and far greater diversity - in the Republican party than Hollywood might have you believe. Hilary Clinton got it half right: The right wing is truly vast, encompassing a vibrant and diverse base holding many different priorities. However, there is no conspiracy; the party is not monolithic.

In fact, the party is evolving rapidly. The newest and youngest members do not look, act, or think like the old guard. Generation X grew up with computers and cable TV. They entered the workforce at the same time as the Internet and embrace technology. They access the information and entertainment they want when they want it. They are individualists, with little patience for censorship or prejudice. Generation Y grew up even later, after political correctness had already firmly taken root. They now rebel against the very institutions, such as racial quotas, that were put in place by the progressives who fought the conservatism of the '60s.

Yet voters continue to see the same gray-haired faces representing the Republican party, in the same suits, with familiar priorities. But that will not last. Political parties are dynamic and they evolve. The South Park Republicans represent a large and growing caucus, espousing many of the party's core ideals, though rejecting the intolerance and censorship of certain religious elements.

South Park Republicans are very real and candidates should listen. Within two days of publication, the previous column generated email from many self-described South Park Republicans. They included a middle aged mother who finds the TV show tasteless, an economics professor, a blue collar worker, an old Truman Democrat, a naval veteran, a home-schooled teen, several Log Cabin Republicans, a tax lawyer, and a 31 year old, Jewish, mink-coat wearing, politically incorrect woman.

The Republican party cannot hold its current majority without this increasingly powerful caucus. The party can continue to adapt and prevail, or splinter and lose. The great thing about big tents is that they are portable. The Republicans of the future do not have to set up the big tent on the same exact political turf of yesteryear.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bigtent; gop; southpark; southparkrepublicans
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 241-252 next last
To: hchutch
Excellent article. One of the best I've read in awhile. I'm 18 and this basically describes me and all of my Republican friends, even here in this very conservative suburb of Dallas. The South Park Republican is a group that's probably always been around, but seems to be emerging a lot more as of late. Although it's doubtful that South Park itself is the cause, having a major pop culture item that we South Park Republicans can identify with (while having many laughs over) greatly helps.
41 posted on 11/15/2002 7:01:18 AM PST by DallasJ7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hchutch
P. J. O'Rourke called this group, "Republican Party Reptiles" and "Ike with a mohawk."
42 posted on 11/15/2002 7:02:03 AM PST by Martin Tell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: walkingdead
Cartman on helping the homeless on Thanksgiving: "...isn't it enough I pay taxes?!?!"

Actually, that's almost word for word a Scrooge quote from A Christmas Carol.

Cartman saying it did crack me up, however!

:-)

43 posted on 11/15/2002 7:02:07 AM PST by Jonah Hex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: fissionproducts
See how silly that line of thinking looks?
Then why are you thinking like that?
44 posted on 11/15/2002 7:02:46 AM PST by philman_36
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Snake65
Yea, I'm probably a bigger Simpsons fan than South Park, but I tell you what, Cartman makes South Park a strong number two. I don't think anyone will be able to top Homer though. dooohhhhh!
45 posted on 11/15/2002 7:03:12 AM PST by walkingdead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: walkingdead
These are argueably two of the greatest minds to ever walk the face of the planet.

Tony Orlando still has you beat with his remark about Bob Hope: "If you could take all the laughter this man has given us, it would reach to the universe and fill up the black hole in space."

But you're close.

46 posted on 11/15/2002 7:04:26 AM PST by monkey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: philman_36
Religion requires you to supress your intellect.
Since when?

Your kidding right? Ever heard of Galileo? The list is long.

47 posted on 11/15/2002 7:04:43 AM PST by Phantom Lord
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: walkingdead
"Simpsons did it! Simpsons did it!"
48 posted on 11/15/2002 7:05:50 AM PST by Snake65
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: fissionproducts
Everyone who is seriously involved in the pursuit of science becomes convinced that a spirit is manifest in the laws of the Universe-a spirit vastly superior to that of man.... In this way the pursuit of science leads to a religious feeling of a special sort, which is indeed quite different from the religiosity of someone more naive.

--Albert Einstein

Oh, what he may have accomplished had he not suppressed his intellect with such spiritual feelings!

49 posted on 11/15/2002 7:06:11 AM PST by Mr. Bird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: All
Episode alert!!

For all LOTR and South Park fans, this week's new episode is a must see. If you were not able to watch it Wednesday night, make sure you see it over the weekend. You gotta love Cartman, but this episode has the perfect part for Butters.... "My precious."

50 posted on 11/15/2002 7:08:13 AM PST by SaveTheChief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: hchutch
I agree with most of what he says, but the following statement strikes out completely with this SPR:

They enjoy the non-Christian mysticism of Star Wars, the acrobatic violence of Jackie Chan, and the comedic vulgarity of Chris Tucker.

Give me the non-Christian mysticism of the NFL, the acrobatic violence professional bull riding, and the comedic vulgarity of Howard Stern.

But taste, or lack of, is an individual thing.

51 posted on 11/15/2002 7:09:02 AM PST by dead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: walkingdead
Pretty much since God said man was made from a grain of dirt...
You got one wrong.
Gen 2:7 And the LORD God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul.
...woman made from one of Adams ribs...
Gen 2:22 And the rib, which the LORD God had taken from man, made he a woman, and brought her unto the man.
And one right.

...not to mention no loving God would put Democrats on his Earth...
He simply put people on the Earth. What they become is up to them. Don't blame Him for a person's choice in becoming Democrats.

52 posted on 11/15/2002 7:11:22 AM PST by philman_36
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

This has to be the first "South Park" thread that's in imminent danger of being sent to the religion forum. Go figure...
53 posted on 11/15/2002 7:12:07 AM PST by general_re
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Phantom Lord
Your kidding right?
No, I'm not a kidder in general, but you're (a contraction of you are) obviously a poor speller.
Ever heard of Galileo?
Yes, I've heard of Galileo. What about him?
54 posted on 11/15/2002 7:15:22 AM PST by philman_36
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: philman_36
really sorry about the HUGE mistake of mine. Imagine me saying dirt instead of dust from the ground. And the democrat thing was a joke, thus the teeheehee.

Remember I'm just as free not to believe as you are to believe. And I do respect your belief, I just see it a different way.
55 posted on 11/15/2002 7:16:19 AM PST by walkingdead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: fissionproducts; Hillary's Lovely Legs
From fissionproducts: I am certainly not a religous person. Religion requires you to supress your intellect.
From Hillary's Lovely Legs: Yes, Matt and Trey have said repeatedly that they are Republicans, but for some weird reason the losertarians always claim them as their own.

I am the holder of doctorates in astrophysics and economics, a senior software engineer in the aerospace field, a religious Catholic, and a libertarian. I'm not a partisan Republican, but when I vote, it's usually for a Republican candidate. I express my opinions in the open and under my right name, so that everyone who hears them will be able to associate them with everything else that's public about me. I defend them with factual evidence and logic, and I admit when I've been proved wrong.

Now, what were you gentlemen saying about my intellect and my political principles? And from behind pseudonyms, no less?

Freedom, Wealth, and Peace,
Francis W. Porretto
Visit The Palace Of Reason: http://palaceofreason.com

56 posted on 11/15/2002 7:16:26 AM PST by fporretto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: general_re
This has to be the first "South Park" thread that's in imminent danger of being sent to the religion forum. Go figure...
Yea!
57 posted on 11/15/2002 7:16:34 AM PST by philman_36
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Chancellor Palpatine
Who, me? LOL.
58 posted on 11/15/2002 7:17:01 AM PST by diotima
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: diotima
Yes, you. It fits.
59 posted on 11/15/2002 7:18:13 AM PST by Chancellor Palpatine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Phantom Lord; mykdsmom
South Park Republican BUMP
60 posted on 11/15/2002 7:20:32 AM PST by Constitution Day
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 241-252 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson