Posted on 11/27/2002 4:29:06 PM PST by goldstategop
Inasmuch as liberals are demanding that Americans ritualistically proclaim, "Islam is a religion of peace," Muslims might do their part by not killing people all the time.
Recently, the Religion of Peace suffered a PR setback when Muslims in Nigeria welcomed the Miss World beauty pageant by slaughtering Christians in the street and burning churches to the ground. At last count, more than 200 people were dead, hundreds more were injured and thousands were left without homes. Also, the Nigerian contestant's chances of winning "Miss Congeniality" were dashed.
Leaping at the one chance they had to attract positive press to their country and perhaps begin the process of dragging themselves out of the 13th century, Nigerian Muslims instead chose to hack innocent people to death with machetes in the name of Allah. Pageant officials pulled up stakes and took the show to London. At least the Christian-carving faithful can sleep at night knowing they've secured a place for themselves in heaven alongside Mohamed Atta.
One can assume the director of the Nigerian Department of Tourism isn't too pleased. Winning the pageant site had been an uphill battle from the beginning. Some of the more closed-minded Miss World participants had already begun carping about the upcoming stoning of a Nigerian woman, in accordance with Islamic sharia law.
The president of Nigeria, Olusegun Obasanjo, tried to downplay the Muslims' murderous rampage by cheerfully explaining: "The beauty queens should not feel that they are the cause of the violence. It could happen at any time irresponsible journalism is committed against Islam." Well, that's a relief.
It seems an article in a Nigerian newspaper had mused that the Prophet Muhammad "would probably have chosen a wife" from among the Miss World contestants. This upset the practitioners of the Religion of Peace, whose polygamous prophet preferred his wives a little younger – one was 6 years old.
They expressed their displeasure with the article by bludgeoning, stabbing and burning Christians to death. In one part of Nigeria, enforcers of the Religion of Peace commanded that Muslims kill Isioma Daniel, the authoress of the blasphemy. (Overheard at Miss World contest: "Does this make me look fatwa?")
The New York Times can't bear to think that their little darlings – angry, violent Muslims – could be at fault in this melee. That makes no sense because Islam is a Religion of Peace. So the Times reviewed the facts, processed it through the PC prism, and spat out the headline: "Religious Violence in Nigeria Drives Out Miss World Event." According to the Times, rampaging Muslims pouring out of mosques to kill Christians and torch churches resulted from "the tinderbox of religious passions in the country."
Islam is peaceful, but religion causes violence. Pay no attention to the fact that the most bloodthirsty cult in the 20th century was an atheistic sect known as communism. But that was not "true communism," just as Muslim terrorists are not practicing "true Islam." The ironic thing is, liberals would hate Muslims who practiced only "true Islam." Without the terrorism, Muslims would just be another group of "anti-choice" fanatics.
But these are the good Muslims – the Mumia Muslims, not the Jerry Falwell Muslims. The police step in to try to quell violent Muslims and the Times reports this as "fighting between Christians and Muslims." Ah, the cycle of violence.
It would be as if a conservative newspaper, with no basis in fact, referred to all murderers as "environmentalists." Environmentalists Fly Planes Into World Trade Center; Environmentalists Rape Woman In Central Park.
Winning "Best in Show" was the Times' headline on an article about the Christian missionary shot dead in Lebanon by a Muslim: "Killing Underscores Enmity of Evangelists and Muslims." This is like referring to the enmity between a woman and her rapist. She hates him, he hates her. It's a cycle of violence! Except the funny thing about the Christians is, they still love the Muslims.
The Muslims' main beef with the Christians was that they "destroy the fighting spirit of the children, especially of the Palestinian youth, by teaching them not to fight the Jews, for the Palestinians to forgive the Jews and leave them Jerusalem." No new data are capable of shaking the Times' faith that Islam is a religion of peace and Christians, as a general matter, deserve to be shot.
The Times seemed to agree the Muslims had a point with the evangelical. In a news analysis, the Times said the missionaries claimed they were merely exposing people to Jesus Christ. "But," the Times charged in a "j'accuse" tone, "a somewhat more direct goal emerges amid the Web site postings." They were asking for it. (On the bright side, at least this means the Times is holding the gun innocent in this one instance.) The Christians were caught red-handed committing irresponsible Web postings against Islam.
Fortunately, Christians do not rip out people's entrails in response to irresponsible journalism committed against Christianity.
But it goes further than simply rioting over a newspaper article and making Christians go to heaven alongside Mohammed Atta. Its about looking fatwa and Muslims find it unbearable in from of scantily clad and thin looking beauties. No wonder the Gray Lady's little darlings where so agitated!
That's what one gets with a sect that thinks it lives in the 13th century. What makes liberals approve of the Religion Of Peace is the anti-Western and anti-progressive terorism it practices. Without it it would just be Jerry Falwell and Pat Robertson anti-choice fundamentalism and as every one knows, liberals find THAT brand of religious faith absolutely beyond the pale!
Christians in the New York Times' worldview are to blame for Muslim aggression. Like Ann says, they ask for it in Nigeria and presumably (does 9-11 come to mind? ;-) ) elsewhere. Christians are just too decent to confront the media slanders against them, which is why the East Coast liberal intellengsia has no problems convicting Christians at the same time as they absolve the Religion Of Peace of not really being tolerant.
Talk about an image problem that goes deeper than the disappearance of the late "Miss Congeniality" show from Abuja. The irony is that the ROP more perfectly describes the faith of Jesus than Mohammed but its not politically correct to sully a religion that rips people's entrails out at a few slips in the local newspaper.
One wishes as Ann rightly does that liberals took issue with Muslims' determination to kill people all the time in the name of peace. Surely, the world would be a better place for it.
But for some flame bait and fun:
1) She is dating a Middle Eastern Christian (there are such people), who fills her in on the actual Middle East situation.
2) Since the Western has refused to "invade their countries, kill their leaders, convert them to Christianity", she figures that she had better find a semi-decent Muslim man, since the West is lead by "girly men" and may well lose.
Does this make my butt look fatwa bump!!!
I don't recall this being a solely liberal stance, nor do I suspect Nigerian muslims are concerned about PR. Nigeria is one of the most densely populated countries on Earth and almost equally divided between Christian and Muslim.
We would do wise to ignore it ... better yet, nominate Clinton as Ambassador to solve this problem ala Ruwanda.
It's just as well by me this once.
Last night I became a True, Real Freeper at last.
I had a dream about Ann Coulter.
She kept morphing back and forth between herself and a lovely person I knew a long time ago.
Swoon.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.