Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rolling in pork: Henry Lamb tracks fed handouts to radical greens
WorldNetDaily.com ^ | Saturday, November 30, 2002 | Henry Lamb

Posted on 11/30/2002 1:06:29 AM PST by JohnHuang2

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last
To: MissAmericanPie
Spread the idea around. If there was mandatory drug testing for employees, contractors (this includes lawyers), of all 501(c) tax-exempt corporations as a condition for non-profit status, none of the Leftist "non-profits" would get anyone to work for them or they would get so few that they could not operate. Many of the ecofascist non-profits would dry up and blow away like aging dung. (This would include testing for marijuana use.)

If this is a required reporting mechanism by the Federal government under the IRS code and monitered at the organizations' expense by an independent testing agency, goodbye Greenpeace, goodbye Sierra Club, goodbye ACLU, goodbye, goodbye, goodbye Leftist pot smoking, LSD dropping, ecstacy eating, heroine and cocaine abusing scum!

21 posted on 11/30/2002 10:38:25 AM PST by Sir Francis Dashwood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: ccmay
Not just the 'watermelon' environmental groups, but the whole panoply of non-profit bleeding-heart foundations needs to have its Federal funding eviscerated. They profess to be helping poor folks, but by and large they are boondoggles for mobilizing armies of otherwise unemployable social-work and liberal-arts majors. These worthless parasites, along with the unions, provide the foot soldiers for the Democratic machine. They need a boot in the ass and an honest job in the private sector to keep them out of mischief.

I hope W. is thinking this far ahead and this ruthlessly. If so, we will bleed the leftists white, and the Republicans can be cemented in power for a generation.

Not meaning to dash your hopes, ccmay, but if you recall from pre-9/11 days (that's when serious debate essentially came to an end), Pres. Bush was actually heading the opposite direction from what you are suggesting.

His plan to give grants to churches and "faith-based organizations" was the compassionate conservative version of the Democrats funding unions and greenies so they'd stay subservient. It was a sure-fire, guaranteed way to corrupt those churches that weren't already.

Enough of these subsidies! It doesn't matter who gets them, they become wards of the state and as a result are intensely interested in perpetuating whatever government programs will bring more money their way.

22 posted on 11/30/2002 11:23:58 AM PST by logician2u
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: farmfriend
,,, thanx for the ping.
23 posted on 11/30/2002 1:09:00 PM PST by shaggy eel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Sir Francis Dashwood
See, why don't we have people like you in D.C. where your brains and ideas are so badly needed? It is a great idea, if we can push it past all the corruption and get it enacted.
24 posted on 11/30/2002 1:59:51 PM PST by MissAmericanPie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: madfly; snopercod; ccmay; Carry_Okie
Here's one way they get their funding. We're about to have one of their little projects in action here in the NW. The Greens want to "expand" the size of Mt. Rainier National Park. They want include the land on a little finger of land with the road that leads into the Carbon River entrance. The land is currently owned by a timber company (Plum Creek) and a private parcel owned by an old couple who wants to sell and move back to civilization. (One of the rare cases of a willing seller).

The way it will work is this: The Greens will buy the two parcels of land, hold it, and as soon as Congress authorizes the money, the Greens will sell it to the Govt. at several times what they paid for it. It's a nice little racket. The Govt. could just as easily buy it directly, but they allow the Greens to "save the land", (nothing to save, it's not going anywhere). the govt. Greens help their enviro-buddies, and then the Govt. can expand the park, close the road and lock up the land.

They see this as a win-win. To the taxpayers, it's a lose-lose. The press plays along with this scam and acts like this is wonder because the park is being enlarged, the land is being "saved", more endangered species will be protected, the evil timber company will never again cut trees within sight of the park, and the land will be preserved for some mythical unspecified "future generation."

25 posted on 11/30/2002 5:26:11 PM PST by holyscroller
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

bttt
26 posted on 12/07/2002 12:14:21 PM PST by Tailgunner Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson