Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The United Nations: It's Time to End the Farce
Sierra Times ^ | 12. 14. 02 | Tom DeWeese

Posted on 12/15/2002 3:49:03 PM PST by Tailgunner Joe

The world is in chaos and, quite frankly, it's the United Nations' fault. It gives validity to zealots and petty bigots. It helps to keep tyrannical dictators in power. It provides money and aid to international terrorists. And it sets itself up as the international economic and environmental standard which all nations are to mirror. The United Nations is the root cause of international trouble, not the answer.

Saddam Hussein is in power, able to threaten world peace today, because the United States allowed the United Nations to dictate the terms for the finish to the Gulf War after an American-organized coalition all but annihilated Iraq as a war machine. In the intervening decade, Iraq has time and again broken the terms of that treaty. The UN's response has been to pass 17 toothless resolutions to demand that Iraq behave itself. Delay. Negotiate. Recommend. Study. Reconsider. Do nothing. This is the game the UN has played in nearly every international crisis.

It is the reason North Korea remains a threat and its violent dictator's son remains in power. It's the reason why Zimbabwe's murderous dictator, Robert Mugabe, is able to steal his election and then steal the land of white property owners and still have a voice at the UN's Sustainable Development Conference. It's the reason why the Communist Chinese are able to ignore any UN rules not to their liking while growing as an international military and economic threat. It's the reason why a terrorist nation like Syria can be given a seat on the UN's Human Rights Council. The United States must share some of the blame for this situation because we allow this circus on the East River to exist. The only credibility the UN possesses comes from recognition by the United States. The only financial security the UN enjoys comes from funds provided by U.S. taxpayers. The only military punch the UN has comes from American military power. The United Nations is a house of cards, but it's a very dangerous house of cards.

The UN is dangerous because its most vocal membership stands in opposition of the American values of representative government, justice, free enterprise, privacy of individuals and private property rights. Most of the UN's members are nations controlled either by communist regimes, kingdoms or mad dictators where American values are either unknown or viewed as a threat.

Those same UN members are busy working to implement plans for UN global governance. Already, the UN's International Criminal Court is in place. The UN has held an international meeting to discuss the possibilities and methods of implementing global taxes. More plans are under consideration to establish a UN global army or police force.

Most member states participating in these planning sessions are from brutal dictatorships like China and Cuba and brutal fundamental Islamic states like Syria and Iran. Can any clear thinking American honestly believe that the ideas coming out of this group would have a possibility of favoring ideals readily accepted as rights in the United States? Or expressed in the UN's Charter?

Many Americans simply do not believe that the United States would voluntarily give up its sovereignty to the United Nations. They say our people would never stand for it. It is happening incrementally with innocent-sounding policies, treaties and protocols.

The North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) was sold as simply a way for American producers to broaden their markets to the international level. Instead, many have found that details of the treaty dictate rules and regulations, particularly of the environmental kind, that tilt the playing field to other nations. As a result, American markets are flooded with foreign goods as American businesses and jobs head out of the country. As a result of NAFTA, the American sheep industry has all but disappeared. Other industries may soon follow as the United States continues to cling to this discredited policy.

The European Union was originally sold as another NAFTA through which nations could join together to compete with the United States in the international market. Now, once-proud nations have given up their national sovereignty, ancient currencies like the Italian Lira and the French Franc have disappeared in place of the Euro. Would the citizens of France, Italy or Greece ever have agreed to such a move had the whole plan been put on a ballot? Now there is discussion of an African Union, a South American Union and a North American Union in which the United States would meld its borders with Canada and Mexico. The move will be easy since NAFTA has already set the precedent.

How long will it be after the establishment of all of these geographical unions before the world moves towards one international union? Imagine a world run by the justice of China, with the economics of Cuba and the military might of the United States. Such is the world of the future under the United Nations. The United States holds all of the cards, but it has only one vote in this cesspool of Socialism.

The United States can end it all now if it wishes. The carefully calculated idea that the UN is a benevolent institution must be changed. President Bush has proven that we don't need the United Nations to grant us permission to protect our national interests. The United States can and will fight its own war on terrorism. It can and will organize its own coalition of allies, use its own money, its own weapons, and its own troops to defeat an enemy who threatens us. When the 108th Congress opens in January, Congressman Ron Paul will once again introduce H.R. 1146, the American Sovereignty Restoration Act. His bill calls for the United States to withdraw from the United Nations. It also calls for the United Nations to remove its headquarters from our shores. H.R. 1146 would relieve the United States from participating in UNESCO and UN environmental policies that endanger our economy and property rights. It would end U.S. participation in UN peacekeeping missions, meaning we would no longer be helping to prop up criminal governments and enemies who seek our demise.

As the UN's irrelevance becomes clearer to Americans; as it drags its feet, delays and passes yet anther meaningless resolution, the time has never been better to change the national mindset to say, "Get us out of the UN." That time is now.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Editorial; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government
KEYWORDS: globaltaxes; icc; ronpaulbump; unlist; wto
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

1 posted on 12/15/2002 3:49:03 PM PST by Tailgunner Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe
Send the UN to Botswana.
2 posted on 12/15/2002 4:06:33 PM PST by sheik yerbouty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe
Dude, you are preaching to the choir! (-:

But I'll bump ya nonetheless.

3 posted on 12/15/2002 4:14:22 PM PST by A_perfect_lady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe
It's interesting that the first effort to create the UN was the League of Nations which was voted down by the US Sentate. I believe the year was 1918, the same year that brought us the 16th ammendment (income taxation) and the Federal Reserve Bank. It also amazes me as to how many people believe that the Fed. is part of the US government.
Regarding the UN, I'd love to see them pack up and leave this country. Of course, only after they've ponied up all of the monies they owe us for all of the military incursions into the varying parts of the world with our troops and ordinance, but on their behalf.
4 posted on 12/15/2002 4:17:42 PM PST by NYDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe
I would like a B-2 drop a JADMs on the UN building on the back to their base in Missouri.
5 posted on 12/15/2002 4:24:43 PM PST by Sparta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe
Bump
6 posted on 12/15/2002 4:24:48 PM PST by FSPress
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A_perfect_lady
I'm with you. End the UN.
7 posted on 12/15/2002 4:26:52 PM PST by Republic of Texas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe
The rest of the World views the UN as the hand puppet of the US. On every Major decision like the current and prior wars on Iraq the US always gets it’s way. When it comes to the Durban conference on Racism the US simply ignores the whole proceeding. The same with the Kyoto protocol. Occasionally the US throws a bone to the rest of the World and allows them some say in how the World is run but that is more for show and to keep the fiction of the UN’s independence operating. The UN also serves as a mechanism for America to buy the cooperation of Power Brokers within a Nations Government so as to give American companies an advantage. At least that is a view that I have read in some of the Foreign Press.
8 posted on 12/15/2002 4:32:21 PM PST by Objectivism USA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: *UN_List
http://www.freerepublic.com/perl/bump-list
9 posted on 12/15/2002 4:36:13 PM PST by Libertarianize the GOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe

10 posted on 12/15/2002 4:48:53 PM PST by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe
Happy to bump this US Out of the UN and UN out of the US thread! :-)

FReegards
11 posted on 12/15/2002 5:08:01 PM PST by CARepubGal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Objectivism USA
Does the foreign press ever explain how, if the UN is a puppet of the US, they manage to keep condeming Israel everytime they attempt to defend themselves? How does that figure into their US led Zionist plot?
12 posted on 12/15/2002 5:40:52 PM PST by A_perfect_lady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Militiaman7; widowithfoursons; Sungirl; Arpege92; Myrean; SouthernFreebird; Fighter@heart; ao98; ...
fyi
13 posted on 12/15/2002 5:42:45 PM PST by madfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth; Spiff; HiJinx; MissAmericanPie; CIBvet; AZHSer; AnnaZ; Mercuria; georgiabelle; ...
fyi
14 posted on 12/15/2002 5:44:05 PM PST by madfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lion's Cub; MsLady; smarticus; Lloyd227; Mudboy Slim; kitd-fohs; RedBloodedAmerican; dwilli; ...
fyi
15 posted on 12/15/2002 5:45:53 PM PST by madfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe
Bump!
16 posted on 12/15/2002 5:48:07 PM PST by SAMWolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: madfly
Evict them. Use the building as a business center! That auditorium could be an excellent place for a concert or two!

At least then it could serve some useful purpose!

17 posted on 12/15/2002 5:53:03 PM PST by Madcelt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe
We became a model for the world because the world was wrong and we could do better. The last hundred years have seen the continuous degradation of our constitution: limitations on our rights to speak, to defend ourselves, fair trial by our peers, protection from search and seizure, the federal government taking all rights not mandated to the states directly inverse to constitutial directive.
Despite that our society is still the best on the planet. The dilemna is that other countries find it easier to blame the last superpower for their problems than to face the truth of their own faulty governing. I refuse to accept guilt for their failures as I refuse to accept any guilt for any subgroup's failures in our own society. They've had my wallet for decades and now wish to see me dancing at the end of a rope for the crime of being born a white male. When did the rest of the world become my responsibility? What happened to the concept of teaching the poor man to fish so he could feed himself for a lifetime?
The United (Against America) Nations needs to relocate to China where their opinions would be given the regard they deserve.
18 posted on 12/15/2002 6:13:41 PM PST by NewRomeTacitus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe
The carefully calculated idea that the UN is a benevolent institution must be changed

GET THE US OUT OF THE UN AND THE UN OUT OF THE US!!

The UN is worse than a waste of money and time. It is a diplomatic toxic waste dump that should be on the Superfund List!

19 posted on 12/15/2002 6:14:57 PM PST by Gritty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe
Let's call it what it is, an attack on America backed by globalists in elected office.
20 posted on 12/15/2002 6:16:22 PM PST by MissAmericanPie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson