Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Time Names Whistleblowers Persons of Year
AP | 12/22/02 | ERIN McCLAM

Posted on 12/22/2002 3:35:21 AM PST by kattracks

NEW YORK, Dec 22, 2002 (AP Online via COMTEX) -- The FBI agent who wrote a scathing memo on FBI intelligence failures and women who blew the whistle on corruption at corporate giants Enron and WorldCom were named Sunday as Time magazine's Persons of the Year.

The magazine's editors chose Coleen Rowley, Cynthia Cooper and Sherron Watkins "for believing - really believing - that the truth is one thing that must not be moved off the books, and for stepping in to make sure that it wasn't."

Time managing editor Jim Kelly said the women embody a critical struggle facing the country - how to restore trust in disgraced institutions, from major corporations to the Catholic Church.

"It's their modesty that's so becoming," Kelly told The Associated Press. "All three are just resolute in standing up for what is right. All three of them are made of very strong character."

Rowley, 48, wrote a letter to FBI Director Robert Mueller in May criticizing the agency for ignoring evidence before Sept. 11, 2001, that hinted of an attack. She later told the Senate that the FBI was mired in bureaucracy and "careerism."

Cooper, 38, a WorldCom internal auditor, alerted the company's board in June to $3.8 billion in accounting irregularities. A month later, the telecommunications giant declared the largest bankruptcy in U.S. history.

Watkins, 43, sent memos in August 2001 warning Enron chairman Kenneth Lay that improper accounting could cause the company to collapse. The company later filed for bankruptcy, and Watkins resigned as a vice president last month.

Time's cover story on the three women compares them with Sept. 11 firefighters as heroes chosen by circumstance.

"They were people who did right just by doing their jobs rightly - which means ferociously, with eyes open and with the bravery the rest of us always hope we have and may never know if we do," the magazine writes.

Last year, Time editors selected then-New York Mayor Rudolph Giuliani for leading the city's response to the Sept. 11 terror attacks. Critics suggested Osama bin Laden should have been the pick as the year's top newsmaker.

The 2002 picks are unusual because the vast majority of the magazine's Persons of the Year have been long-established public figures - world leaders, war heroes, corporate chiefs.

In an interview with Time editors, Rowley, Cooper and Watkins - nationally unknown before this year - said some colleagues now hate them for shedding light on the mistakes of their superiors.

"There is a price to be paid," Cooper said. "There have been times that I could not stop crying."

The magazine's Persons of the Year package includes profiles of the women and a joint interview of the three, conducted earlier this month. The issue hits newsstands Monday.

---

On the Net:

Time magazine: http://www.time.com

By ERIN McCLAM Associated Press Writer

Copyright 2002 Associated Press, All rights reserved




TOPICS: Breaking News; Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last
To: kattracks
Each of the whistleblowers was right to do what she did. However, it doesn't take much to believe that Time chose them so that they could drag the Enron stuff back up against GWB, not to mention pinning FBI problems on him, no matter how pre-GWB the problems were. Things are going too well for GWB and those poll numbers are too high, they have to do something about that!
21 posted on 12/22/2002 7:21:48 AM PST by Moonmad27
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Look, it's just business.

These'll be flying off the shelves as Mr. & Mrs. America eagerly delves into the journalistic nuggets within.

The lust for the Almighty Dollar wins out; Time knows what moves news.

/sarcasm

22 posted on 12/22/2002 7:47:52 AM PST by Hank Rearden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GodBlessRonaldReagan
Amen brother!

AOL Kills!

23 posted on 12/22/2002 7:53:40 AM PST by bert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Time magazine has several purposes in my house:
1. lines the cat's litter box
2. lines the oil change drip pan
3. one row behind the toilet paper on the survival rack.
24 posted on 12/22/2002 9:08:37 AM PST by HadEnough
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
In fairness to AOL magazine, it was this non-choice or another non-choice, the much-bandied-about generic terrorist. You'll also recall the talk of Eminem (ew! yuck! gross!).

That said, recall the choice for 1991, Ted Turner. The magazine's editors inspired gales of laughter when they said, "WE didn't know Time Warner had a stake in Turner Broadcasting!!" The company bought Ted out later. Talk about "independence."

Or as Wolcott Gibbs wrote in his famous parody, "Where it will all end, knows God!"

25 posted on 12/22/2002 10:36:02 AM PST by GeneD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
I'm kind of surprised that Al Gore wasn't their guy for his extraordinary courage!
26 posted on 12/22/2002 10:36:12 AM PST by Chi-townChief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinuteGal
I don't see Linda Tripp's photo on the cover of Time along with the three lady whistleblowers.

It's all in semantics; since the term "whistleblower" has an honorable connotation, no way was it ever used insofar as Linda; she was morphed into the backstabbing ratfink category.

27 posted on 12/22/2002 10:45:08 AM PST by ErnBatavia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: ErnBatavia
Anti-Capitalist Commie agenda by Time. Selective attention.
28 posted on 12/22/2002 10:54:13 AM PST by flamefront
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Is this for real???
29 posted on 12/22/2002 11:41:12 AM PST by Mo1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #30 Removed by Moderator

To: kattracks
It's too bad there were no courageous individuals during the 8 years of the Clinton administration who rolled over.

On the other hand, it is much harder to blow the whistle when your life is threatened.

31 posted on 12/22/2002 12:19:29 PM PST by irish guard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Good grief. Is that a politically motivated decision by TIME or what. This gives the other National-Socialist 'reporters' an excuse to re-run old stories and do new ones to try and make "corporate greed" and "Bush knew" stick to the Republicans. They just don't seem to understand that the more they engage in these nazi-istic propaganda ploys the more the public sees them for what they are. Hate-mongering ghouls that only publish rubbish.
32 posted on 12/22/2002 12:31:51 PM PST by thatdewd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy
Was Linda Tripp included?

Funny. That was my first thought. I'm proud to be in the "Great Minds Think Alike" category with you.

33 posted on 12/22/2002 1:28:53 PM PST by cantfindagoodscreenname
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Do you suppose they would print any letters to the editor mentioning Linda Tripp? Maybe we should ALL write.
34 posted on 12/22/2002 1:32:28 PM PST by hoosiermama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: exit82
You will notice that Phil Gramm's wife, who sat on the audit board of Enron, never opened her yap about anything, nor did Good ole Phil. Now Phil has bailed from the Senate. Wonder if he figured that the jog was up, that he figured that getting the money indirectly was getting a bit too risky?
35 posted on 12/22/2002 1:46:51 PM PST by RobbyS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot
Well, even the Bushies don't like Linda. You may remember they gave her zip when they got into office, although they could have.
36 posted on 12/22/2002 1:49:50 PM PST by RobbyS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: hoosiermama
Do you suppose they would print any letters to the editor mentioning Linda Tripp? Maybe we should ALL write.

I'm on it right now. Who's with me???

Time needs a Freepin'!

37 posted on 12/22/2002 2:04:06 PM PST by L.N. Smithee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Excellent choice, Time Magazine! Congratulations, for pointing out those who have lain it on the line for better justice and law enforcement for all American citizens!
38 posted on 12/22/2002 2:42:11 PM PST by unspun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Moonmad27
However, it doesn't take much to believe that Time chose them so that they could drag the Enron stuff back up against GWB, not to mention pinning FBI problems on him, no matter how pre-GWB the problems were. Things are going too well for GWB and those poll numbers are too high, they have to do something about that!

Yep, this is merely Time's way of trying to resurrect a failed Democrat campaign strategy. Too little, too late, too... (yawn).

39 posted on 12/22/2002 2:51:56 PM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy
Was Linda Tripp included?

Man, my first thought also, along with all the other brave souls, many of them women, who were courageous enough to stand up (and suffer greatly) to the evil Clintons and the criminal DNC.

Where is the Time Magazine cover for true heros like Gary Aldrich or Kathleen Willey? If Time had listened to Aldrich there would have been no 9-11 or sale by the democrats of our missle and nuclear tecnology to the ChiComs.

In point of fact, Time is part of the enormous smear machine against true whistle blowers and is part of the endless cover-up efforts.

Time is intellectual toilet paper, no longer a serious magazine. You get more honest news from The Enquirer!

40 posted on 12/22/2002 2:53:12 PM PST by friendly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson