Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Talk radio needs some balance [petulant liberal jeremiad BARF ALERT]
St. Paul Pioneer Press ^ | 12/23/02 | Wayne Madsen

Posted on 12/23/2002 4:05:51 AM PST by rhema

It is high time for the Federal Communications Commission to re-institute its traditional Fairness Doctrine and guarantee equal access for all points of view over the public — that is — our airwaves.

The Fairness Doctrine was scrapped by the FCC in 1987 during a time when Ronald Reagan was out to get the government out of practically every facet of our lives. But the deregulation by the FCC of radio only ensured that mega-media corporations were able to gobble up more and more independently owned stations and then offer up zealots like Rush Limbaugh and what Sen. Tom Daschle, D-S.D., calls Rush wannabes on hundreds of radio stations across the country.

Soon, both local and nationally syndicated Rush wannabes began offering a daily concoction of right-wing politics to a public that largely ignored their local newspapers and relied upon the radio rants for their news.

In some cases, the vitriol came directly from the fax machines of the Republican National Committee. In other cases, the propaganda echoed that written in the Washington Times or on right-wing Internet sites like the Drudge Report, World Net Daily and News Max.

The political misuse of the commercial airwaves was what Al Gore was talking about when he recently told the New York Observer that "the media is kind of weird these days on politics, and there are some major institutional voices that are, truthfully speaking, part and parcel of the Republican Party."

Liberal alternatives cannot be found on the public commercial airwaves. A few liberals, like Jim Hightower, found an outlet on a few public radio stations, but their reach to the general public is worse than Radio Free Europe's during the days of Soviet radio jamming.

After the events of Sept. 11, it can be argued whether the right-wing hosts are actually helping to destroy America's way of life rather than claiming to protect it.

Daschle said the talk-show blatherers create "an emotional movement in this country among some people... who are then so energized as to go out and hurt somebody."

Daschle, it should be noted, was a recipient of deadly anthrax in the mail soon after Sept. 11 when the radio waves were flooded with invective tones of hate and retribution. And it does not help when a Rush wannabe in Boston refers to the soon-to-be Senate minority leader as "Dass-hole."

Rush Limbaugh may be, as Sen. John McCain claimed, a mere "circus clown," but we must recall what happened to one of America's last liberal radio talk show hosts.

In 1984, Alan Berg, who had infuriated a number of neo-Nazis, was shot to death by them in front of his Denver home.

It's not so much the Limbaughs that are the problem but the people they tend to incite to violence. The talk-show hosts who consistently call for "rounding up" foreigners are playing into the hands of many racists and xenophobes and that is what Daschle was talking about when he talked about enraged listeners going out and hurting somebody.

Democratic Sen. Richard Durbin of Illinois told National Public Radio that there is "station after station of right-wing screamers."

With Gore, Daschle and Durbin all finally aware of the misuse of the public commercial airwaves by the Republican Party and its rightist allies, the FCC's commissioners must revisit the Fairness Doctrine.

However, time is of the essence because the FCC, under the leadership of Michael Powell, the son of Secretary of State Colin Powell, is considering scrapping even more FCC regulations over OUR airwaves.

Madsen is the Washington correspondent for Intelligence Online and a political columnist for Counter Punch. Distributed by Knight Ridder News Service.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; News/Current Events; US: Minnesota
KEYWORDS: fairnessdoctrine; fcc; rushlimbaugh; talkradio
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last
Fortunately, this article appeared in the more journalistically balanced of the two Twin Cities dailies, St. Paul Pioneer Press, where it was paired with Amy Ridenour's Liberals should stop whining.

The remorselessly, monolithically liberal Minneapolis Star Tribune probably wouldn't have suffered Ridenour's article to see the light of day.

1 posted on 12/23/2002 4:05:52 AM PST by rhema
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: rhema
"YOU CAN'T HANDLE THE TRUTH!"
2 posted on 12/23/2002 4:11:59 AM PST by Shenandoah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rhema
Maybe Donahue could do a radio program. [I hear he will be looking for a new gig in January 2003.]
3 posted on 12/23/2002 4:13:07 AM PST by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rhema
Democratic Sen. Richard Durbin of Illinois told National Public Radio...

YEAH, we need more stations just like NPR. /sarcasm

4 posted on 12/23/2002 4:15:57 AM PST by Drango
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Shenandoah
"YOU CAN'T HANDLE THE TRUTH!"

But with the force of judicial fiat, they're the most zealous truth suppressors on the planet, Chicoms included.

5 posted on 12/23/2002 4:18:35 AM PST by rhema
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rhema
Liberal alternatives cannot be found on the public commercial airwaves. What the heck then is National Public Ratio?
6 posted on 12/23/2002 4:19:27 AM PST by OldPossum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rhema
...With Gore, Daschle and Durbin all finally aware of the misuse of the public commercial airwaves by the Republican Party and its rightist allies, the FCC's commissioners must revisit the Fairness Doctrine...

Sponsor of the Gore, Daschle and Durbin Radio Show...

7 posted on 12/23/2002 4:19:51 AM PST by Oldeconomybuyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy
Maybe Donahue could do a radio program. [I hear he will be looking for a new gig in January 2003.]

He may be vying with Minnesota's ex-governor for that gig.

(Actually, I have it on very good authority -- a member of the Ventura cabinet to whom I spoke yesterday -- that Jesse's more interested in a Hardball-type television show.)

8 posted on 12/23/2002 4:21:40 AM PST by rhema
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: rhema; Drango
Good post. Hooray for Michael Powell. Drango thanks for the Stein link yesterday.
9 posted on 12/23/2002 4:23:39 AM PST by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Drango
YEAH, we need more stations just like NPR. /sarcasm

I'm trying to remember: Is NPR the media outlet with the "Fair and balanced. We report; you decide" motto?

10 posted on 12/23/2002 4:24:01 AM PST by rhema
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: rhema
Some years ago host Ken Hamblin dubbed talk radio "the Voice of the Real America..."

And I firmly believe he was dead-on correct. I listen to the local show besides the "big voices" like Rush & Hannity, and you know what? I hear real people, real concerns, and honest opinions... and a lot of stuff that will never be voiced on television, or in national papers. Not because it's rude or wrong or bigoted, but because it doesn't fit the left-wing template of the mainstream media.

Talk radio ( charmingly called "talkback radio" in Australia... ) gives a voice to all us folks in flyover country who are held in such disdain by some.

11 posted on 12/23/2002 4:25:54 AM PST by backhoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
[Sominex]Sponsor of the Gore, Daschle and Durbin Radio Show

Listeners surely won't need any soporific other than the show itself.

12 posted on 12/23/2002 4:27:23 AM PST by rhema
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: rhema
As I recall, aren't most of the newspapers members of large conglomerates?

We should worry about radio networks, but left wing liberal newspaper "networks" spewing socialist, liberal, left wing propoganda, that is OK?

13 posted on 12/23/2002 4:28:28 AM PST by BB2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: rhema
Liberals have no need for information radio or information TV. They have CNNNBCABCCBSPBSMSNBC all locked up!!!!!

We gave them Phil, they gave him back!

It's not equal time they want, it's suppression of information they want.

Suppression - Conscious exclusion of unacceptable desires, thoughts, or memories from the mind. (American Heritage Dict)
14 posted on 12/23/2002 4:30:08 AM PST by JoeSixPack1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rhema
I'm trying to remember: Is NPR the media outlet with the "Fair and balanced. We report; you decide" motto?

Don't laugh but "Public Broadcasting" already has a "Fairness Doctrine". That's right, they are required by law to be balanced.

(SNORT...I just blew coffee all over)

15 posted on 12/23/2002 4:31:57 AM PST by Drango
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: rhema
A few liberals, like Jim Hightower, found an outlet on a few public radio stations, but their reach to the general public is worse than Radio Free Europe's during the days of Soviet radio jamming.

To Wayne Madsen: I've heard Jim Hightower. Sometimes it's his assumptions that turn me off....sometimes it's his conclusions. In either case I disagree with him. And I think I'm every bit as smart as he is. (I've listened to Rush....he sees things that I don't.)

Besides, radio is a business. If he can't hold an audience then radio stations shouldn't be forced to carry him.

It's the bottom-line, stupid.

16 posted on 12/23/2002 4:35:38 AM PST by xzins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rhema
Liberal alternatives cannot be found on the public commercial airwaves. A few liberals, like Jim Hightower, found an outlet on a few public radio stations,

Makes sense, as government is a god to liberals.

17 posted on 12/23/2002 4:35:39 AM PST by StriperSniper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rhema; OldPossum
It is high time for the Federal Communications Commission to re-institute its traditional Fairness Doctrine and guarantee equal access for all points of view over the public — that is — our airwaves.

In the market place of ideas the socialists fail. If no one wanted to listen to conservative talk radio then advertisers wouldn't support it and the station would have to do something else. Doesn't anyone remember the failed attempt of Mario Cuomo?

Liberal alternatives cannot be found on the public commercial airwaves. What the heck then is National Public Ratio? Prime example of why the socialists require the government to force their whacky ideas down citizens throats.

18 posted on 12/23/2002 4:35:44 AM PST by Jimmy Valentine's brother
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: backhoe
Talk radio ( charmingly called "talkback radio" in Australia... ) gives a voice to all us folks in flyover country who are held in such disdain by some.

Back in the '60s and '70's, when I started listening to the radio, WERE in Cleveland used the phrase "talk back radio".

19 posted on 12/23/2002 4:35:59 AM PST by Forgiven_Sinner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: rhema
Bump for later.
20 posted on 12/23/2002 4:39:18 AM PST by Springman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson