Skip to comments.
N.Korea "could make 50 bombs a year"
Reuters ^
| 12/24/02
| Jim Wolf
Posted on 12/24/2002 2:26:35 PM PST by Ranger
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
1
posted on
12/24/2002 2:26:35 PM PST
by
Ranger
To: Ranger
I see a massive raid on their Nuclear Facilities in the near future
2
posted on
12/24/2002 3:10:08 PM PST
by
MJY1288
To: Ranger; All
3
posted on
12/24/2002 3:13:13 PM PST
by
backhoe
To: Ranger
It sounds like N. Korea has a permanent solution to the California budget defcit. ;-)
btw why hasn't Patty Murray spoken out how good the N. Koreans are at building schools and roads and day care centers?
4
posted on
12/24/2002 3:15:12 PM PST
by
cgbg
To: Ranger
Blackmail is coming, but not from NK.
5
posted on
12/24/2002 3:16:07 PM PST
by
cynicom
To: Ranger
Yah... but it'll have to deliver then by ox cart...
6
posted on
12/24/2002 3:24:09 PM PST
by
pabianice
To: cynicom
Soooooo, cynicom, are you game for the big history quiz tomorrow? Since, as you claim, I am an intellectural fraud, you should beat me very easily. Plus I'll give you the advantage---Since you were in the Korean War, I'll even limit the first ten questions to that conflict. Will you accept the challenge? I dip my drinking gourd into the acrid waters of the Yalu River. See me drink from it and gorge my bladder. Hit me with those CHICOM HORDES! Play your bugles! Cynicom---HEEEEEEEEERE'S PJ!!!
7
posted on
12/24/2002 3:24:27 PM PST
by
PJ-Comix
To: PJ-Comix
PJ...Humor is not your bag but childishness does become you.
8
posted on
12/24/2002 3:27:27 PM PST
by
cynicom
To: Ranger
And we'd buy every one of them for more than we contribute in aid right this moment. When the Soviet Union went toes up, we bought excess plutonium and shipped to Oak Ridge et al. I tried for months to find out what we'd paid for it. It was, of course, a secret. Better export than oil or gold.
9
posted on
12/24/2002 3:31:56 PM PST
by
Glenn
To: cynicom
Funny how you feel free to cast aspersions upon my intelligence but then back down when faced with an open challenge. Oh well. Maybe we will still have a history quiz (including Korean War questions) tomorrow without the almighty cynicom in attendance.
p.s. QUICK, cynicom! What battleship was McArthur on when they the Marines landed on Inchon? And no fair peeking on Google for the correct answer.
10
posted on
12/24/2002 3:33:24 PM PST
by
PJ-Comix
To: PJ-Comix
Pj ...Are you stalking me??? I would hate to think that. Please refrain.
11
posted on
12/24/2002 3:34:54 PM PST
by
cynicom
To: cynicom
No stalking. But you didn't answer the question. Anyway the correct answer is that it wasn't a battleship. It was an Amphibious Force Command Ship by the name of U.S.S. Mount McKinley (AGC-7).
12
posted on
12/24/2002 3:42:01 PM PST
by
PJ-Comix
To: Ranger
Under the 1994 deal, North Korea agreed to freeze the 5-megawatt reactor plus the partially built 50- and 200-megawatt plants. Also frozen were a reprocessing facility and a fuel-rod fabrication plant at Yongbyon. In exchange, Washington agreed to provide a $5 billion package to include two proliferation-resistant light-water reactors and 500,000 metric tons of heavy fuel oil a year until the first light-water reactor was built.
I am confused..
This sounds like a good deal on the part of the Clinton administration. I hear some people making it sound as if we gave them the reactors in the first place.. but this article makes not that they already had them and we swapped them some "proliferation-resistant" facilities instead..
What's wrong with that? I would say billy bob krintoon actually got this one right.
Is there something I am missing here?
13
posted on
12/24/2002 3:45:20 PM PST
by
Jhoffa_
To: Jhoffa_
PS: You know, I also believe we never followed through on our end of the bargain.. (to build the plants)
If not, why not?
Seems like a stupid thing to do if you ask me.
14
posted on
12/24/2002 3:49:38 PM PST
by
Jhoffa_
To: Ranger
Aren't the plutonium and uranium-type A-bombs different technologies - the uranium takes more material, but is "simpler" (the route Pakistan took)?
How did NK get technology to build the plutonium one?
To: MJY1288
I see joint US and Chinese military actions in North Korea in the future. If the North Koreans keep acting like a hand grenade without a pin, it will also be in the best interest to neutralize their comrades on the Korean peninsula.
To: canuck_conservative
"How did NK get technology to build the plutonium one? "
You'll be shocked to know this.. But it was the toon.
17
posted on
12/24/2002 4:21:55 PM PST
by
Monty22
To: Ranger
The North Korean fiasco is a good example why we cannot allow international nutcase dictators have the bomb.
To: Ranger
Not if they are "exeunt" off the world stage!
To: Ranger
THANK YOU BILL CLINTON
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson