Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Persistent Drop in Fertility Reshapes Europe's Future [The Death of the West]
NY Times ^ | 12/26 | FRANK BRUNI

Posted on 12/26/2002 6:50:59 AM PST by twas

On a recent night at the Blue Elephant recreation center here, a clutch of parents watched adoringly as dozens of 3- and 4-year-olds sprinted through a colorful playroom, bounced on the cushioned floor or doodled on drawing pads, aglow with creative pride.

It was Italy as outsiders still imagine it: child-worshiping and family-loving.

But there was something wrong with the picture. Most of the parents were gazing at one, and only one, child. That was true of Gianluca Valenti, who said that giving his son any siblings would be too exhausting and expensive, and of Barbara Lenzi, who said that more than one child "doesn't seem to make sense."

It was also true of Rosa Andolfi, who responded to a question about having an additional child as if a vampire were near.

"Basta!" Ms. Andolfi more or less yelped, then made a cross with her index fingers and thrust it forward. That gesture was not just funny but telling; it touched on an increasingly worrisome reality for Italy and other European countries whose fertility rates have plummeted over the last decades, shifting one-child families close to the statistical norm.

In Spain and Sweden, Germany and Greece, the total fertility rate — or the average number of children that a woman, based on current indicators, is expected to give birth to — was 1.4 or lower last year, according to the World Health Organization.

In no West European country did the rate reach 2.1 — the marker that, demographers say, means an exact replenishment of the population. By contrast, the United States had a 2.0 rate, which demographers attribute to greater immigration.

While that trend has been evident for many years, its slow-building consequences are now coming into starker relief, as more West European countries acknowledge and take new steps to address the specter of sharply winnowed and less competitive work forces, surfeits of retirees and pension systems that will need to be cut back deeply.

In Italy, where the fertility rate last year was 1.2, according to the health organization, Labor Minister Roberto Maroni has announced that the cost of the state pension system will need to be reduced. Mr. Maroni said the government would offer incentives, which he did not specify, to keep people at work past the minimum retirement age of 57.

The United Nations recently published data suggesting that the population of Spain could decline to about 31.3 million in 2050 from about 39.9 million now. According to the World Health Organization, Spain's fertility rate last year was 1.1, the lowest in Western Europe. Many provinces in Italy's wealthy, well-educated north have rates well below that.

The rate in the province of Ferrara, which includes the city of Ferrara, has been under 0.9 for each of the years since 1986 that Italy's National Institute of Statistics kept track.

Ferrara officials talk about the dearth of young children in the streets, the closing of elementary schools over the last decade and a pervasive sense that something is missing.

"There's a lack of energy," Deputy Mayor Tiziano Tagliani said in a recent interview here. "The society is colder without children."

Nationwide, Italy's fertility rate has been so low for so long — under 1.5 since 1984 — that the country offers an especially good glimpse into the dimensions and dynamics of the trend.

For example, Italy now has the world's oldest population. The percentage of people 60 or older is 25, compared with 16 percent in the United States, according to the population division of the United Nations.

The division's experts project that by 2050, if current trends hold, 42 percent of Italy's population will be 60 or older.

Antonio Golini, a professor of demographics at the University of Rome, Sapienza, said that would be "unsustainable, from a cultural and even psychological point of view."

That sense of alarm was reflected in Pope John Paul II's first-ever address to the Italian Parliament in November. The pope said "the crisis of the birthrate" in Italy was a "grave threat that bears upon the future of this country."

In Italy, as in other West European countries, the low fertility rate is interwoven with an array of other issues — immigration, for one. While many people and many politicians in Europe would like to clamp down on the rising tide of new arrivals over the last decade, they may be forced to accept it, simply to fill jobs and maintain levels of productivity.

Europe stands out as the continent with the lowest fertility rates. The numbers are now starkest in East European countries like Bulgaria, Latvia and Ukraine, each of which had a rate of 1.1 in 2001, according to the World Health Organization. (Its figures sometimes differ slightly from those of individual countries, but provide a yardstick.)

But the trend hit Western Europe earlier, and has had more time to produce hand-wringing and soul-searching. Apart from welcoming more immigrants, no one knows precisely what to do.

Many governments have expanded tax breaks for parents, child care alternatives or maternity and paternity benefits, acknowledging that a high cost of living and more women in the work force can be obstacles to large families. In some of those countries, like France, the fertility rate has nudged slightly upward.

Spain is considering a variety of ways to address those obstacles: cheaper utility bills for large families; assistance for young couples who are trying to afford homes; the creation of hundreds of thousands of new preschools and nursery schools; and longer hours for existing schools, an accommodation for working parents.

Although the Italian government provides mothers with nearly full salary compensation for about a half-year of maternity leave, the city of Ferrara, like several other north Italian cities, added benefits that kick in after that period. They include cash supplements of about $350 a month for mothers who want to stay at home an additional nine months. Ferrara also has pumped millions of dollars into nursery schools and child care centers like the Blue Elephant.

But Italy's low fertility rate persists, suggesting that the reasons go well beyond the arithmetic of salaries and schedules.

"People are studying longer, and thus are finding work later, when there is work, and then are marrying later, which doesn't necessarily mean having a baby anymore," said Valerio Terra Abrami, head of the department of social statistics for Italy's National Institute of Statistics.

Contraception and abortion are more readily available. Divorce is more common.

Moreover, decades of prosperity have altered people's assumptions and expectations. Older people once poised to look after grandchildren now pursue other activities and travel more. As for would-be parents, their attachments to leisure time, conveniences and indulgences do not easily accommodate multiple children — or sometimes, for that matter, any children at all.

"It's never been at the top of my list," said Teresa Ginori, 41, a fashion magazine consultant who lives outside Milan. "It's never been in the top 200 things."

Ms. Ginori and many women she knows have never married, in part, she said, because of a facet of Italian life that she cited as one possible explanation for the especially low fertility rate here.

Many Italian men, she said, live with their mothers into their 30's. When they marry, they are not prepared to help out at home in ways that take pressure off women, especially if those women want to have children.

"Even the most open-minded guy — if you scratch with the nail a little bit, there's the mother who did everything for him," she said. "I hate the mothers of these men. These mothers are a disaster."

Parents also seem to feel that they owe more opportunities to the children they do have, a conviction that discourages large families.

That partly explained the prevalence of only children in Ferrara, where one-child parents at the Blue Elephant center mentioned siblings who had also stopped at one child. The center's coordinator, Monica Viaro, 37, has only one child, an 8-year-old son.

Ms. Andolfi, 32, who has a 3-year-old son, said a second child would limit her son and limit the baby. She conceded that her family's definition of what it needed was expansive.

"The cellphones aren't enough and the televisions aren't enough," she said. "It's a little selfish."

Ms. Lenzi, 32, who is also part of a two-career couple, said she liked to read to her 3-year-old son, adding, "It doesn't make sense to have three just to tuck them in at night and say, `Ciao, stella,' and that's it."


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: abortion; abortionlist; birthrates; catholiclist; contraceptives; enviralists; europe; fashionukraine; population; populationcontrol; prolife; un; unitednations; unlist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-85 next last
To: friendly; BlackElk; Salvation; TotusTuus; Aquinasfan; patent; Siobhan; maryz; Desdemona
Yes we are that selfish a Western culture

Nice post.

Also remember the fate of Balshazzar--and that one of HIS 'gods' was the 'god of gold.'

Mene, mene, tekel upharsin...

61 posted on 12/27/2002 8:51:54 AM PST by ninenot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: ninenot
Thanks for the ping!

BTTT!
62 posted on 12/27/2002 8:57:40 AM PST by Salvation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: ninenot
Even in Europe, nothing gets cheaper, or stays the same. It's a fact. You don't really expect costs to go down do you, either for the govt, or private enterprises.
63 posted on 12/27/2002 9:18:21 AM PST by stuartcr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: ninenot
THIS is the problem that PJBuchanan has not addressed. While he carries on about "immigration problems" (meaning there are too many immigrants,) he has not yet proposed exactly how the Gummint will provide the promised SOcial Security/Medicaid bennies with NO TAXPAYERS REMAINING...

I believe Pat expects the Revolution, if we cut off immigration. It's the only alternative that's really logical. Massive euthanasia, or try to keep working until they die ...

It's only recently that everyone came to expect years of tax-supported idleness, and the increase in life expectancy just makes the crisis deeper. The article mentioned that the retirement age in Italy is 57 (!!!), so an average of 20 years on the dole ...

The whole system is built on immigration, and will crash if the immigration stops (or if the immigrants, and the rest of us with kids, decide to stop supporting it.)

64 posted on 12/27/2002 10:02:42 AM PST by Tax-chick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: tom h
Is your solution to make people skinny, smart, and unhappy? Good luck.
65 posted on 12/27/2002 10:05:55 AM PST by stuartcr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: TomSmedley
The truth is that there is no threat of overpopulation. There was an article by Wattenberg in the Spectator about how even third world populations are starting to decline. (I realize it doesn't seem like it.) We face a future world full of oldsters and then what?....
66 posted on 12/27/2002 10:21:44 AM PST by Pining_4_TX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: ninenot
You're ignoring economic factors. The threshold for what consitutes "overpopulation" varies hugely according to the educational and economic development level of the society in question. Taiwan and Hong Kong are hardly bastions of illiteracy. Niger and other countries which are in dire straits have populations which know how to do very little beyond inefficient farming, and yet are producing 6-8 children per woman, when the parents can't manage to feed them, much less to educate them so that the next generation can have a better life.
67 posted on 12/27/2002 10:28:36 AM PST by GovernmentShrinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: GovernmentShrinker
The threshold for what consitutes "overpopulation" varies hugely according to the educational and economic development level of the society in question.

Actually, all overpopulated countries have one thing in common -- socialisim! When people are ruled by a kleptocracy which periodically hurls monkey wrenches into the machinery of production and distribution, supply no longer meets demand.

68 posted on 12/27/2002 10:57:57 AM PST by TomSmedley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: GovernmentShrinker
much less to educate them so that the next generation can have a better life.

Care to define "better life" in terms OTHER than "more" of everything?

Longer? Able to read 4 languages? SUV's?

The College Education (which has now deteriorated to HS equivalency?)

The Renaissance, which manifested great cultural development, took place in an era in which people still died before the age of 50 (typically) and lived in drafty, leaky homes. No sewer systems, and a long walk to the clean water.

69 posted on 12/27/2002 11:43:03 AM PST by ninenot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: ninenot
bump

Material goods don't always bring a better or happier life.
70 posted on 12/27/2002 11:44:09 AM PST by Desdemona
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick
Remember that Bismarck established "social security eligibility" as 65 only because the vast majority of people died before then.
71 posted on 12/27/2002 11:45:22 AM PST by ninenot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: ninenot
It's easy to romanticize to poverty and illiteracy from the comfort of your computer terminal in a climate-controlled building, with a full stomach. However, the reality is very very bleak. The reality is parents who sell their children to brothels and slave traders for a few dollars, so they can feed themselves and their other children for a few more months. And it's hordes of young men who are easy marks for recruitment by outfits like the Taliban and Mugabe's thugs. And it's people who believe it when someone tells them that they can avoid AIDS by forcing themselves on the nearest virgin even it's a 6 month old baby. And on and on.

In a country like Niger where less than 14% of the population has even basic literacy skills, notions of college for the masses are so far in the future that it's not even on the radar screen. These people can't feed themselves as it is, and they're going backwards fast. Perhaps you should sell your computer, sell or otherwise vacate your home, transfer the contents of your bank account to some worthy charity, and go live in a makeshift tent on the edge of landfill from which you will scrounge your food, since you're so convinced that modern conveniences are of no real value. If you can figure out a way to empty your mind of the contents acquired through education, that would complete the picture.

By the way, the Renaissance was an activity engaged in by a tiny minority of people, while the rest continued in physical, spiritual, and intellectual misery.
72 posted on 12/27/2002 12:40:52 PM PST by GovernmentShrinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: stuartcr
LOL! Touche, point to you stuartcr! It took me a minute to understand what the heck you were talking about. Thanks for giving me a laugh.
73 posted on 12/27/2002 1:45:20 PM PST by tom h
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: stuartcr
Just for fun, look up the # of Federal cabinet secretaries in 1955 and compare to today.

I don't expect the cost/employee to go down. But I sure expect the gross number of employees to remain within reason.

States, Feds, municipals: all are grossly over-manned and have enjoyed the benefits of 'mission creep' by adding hundreds of thousands of employees--many of which make work for the private sector (filling out EEO-1, complying with hundreds of mandates.

And NOW we have the Feds manning the airports. Unlike the private security types, the Feds work 8-straight hour shifts, whereas the private companies staffed up for rush hours and staffed down for the lag times.

More bodies doing nothing for longer. Gummint at work.
74 posted on 12/27/2002 2:54:32 PM PST by ninenot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: GovernmentShrinker
Go shrink a government if you want a worthwhile activity.

About three posts above yours, someone sagaciously observed that poverty is a consequence of socialism. While he is correct, OTHER governments are simply thieves.

Private property rights are a large part of prosperity, along with a government which has a moral compass.

As to life in Europe in the Renaissance--those people were perfectly happy with their lot. Children were not only accepted, but wanted, largely because children were able to assist in the chores, allowing more chores/day as the parents aged.

People died before the age of 50. So what??
75 posted on 12/27/2002 2:59:26 PM PST by ninenot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: stuartcr
They need to learn to take care of themselves.
76 posted on 12/27/2002 4:24:25 PM PST by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: stuartcr
Otherwise private charity can take care of the needy ---and would do it much better than the government has ---government charity isn't real charity.
77 posted on 12/27/2002 4:26:57 PM PST by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: quebecois
Liberals having less children...conservatives having more...sounds good to me.
78 posted on 12/27/2002 4:27:24 PM PST by SamAdams76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76
How can that be good if the net result a low fertility rate? It can't. This is not an issue of left vs right; it's an issue of survivability of the gene pool.
79 posted on 12/27/2002 5:30:12 PM PST by 4Americaslove
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: 4Americaslove
I don't know if we have to worry about that anyhow. There are kids everywhere I look.
80 posted on 12/27/2002 5:35:03 PM PST by SamAdams76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-85 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson