Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. Would Send 690,000 Troops to Korea If War Breaks Out: Report
Yonhap News Worldservice (S Korea) ^

Posted on 12/27/2002 12:37:59 PM PST by RCW2001

Seoul, Dec. 27 (Yonhap) -- The United States would deploy some 690,000 troops to augment the 37,000-strong American military presence already here if war should break out on the peninsula, a Defense Ministry report showed Friday.

   The augmented forces would comprise of Army divisions, carrier battle groups with highly-advanced fighters, tactical fighter wings, and marine expeditionary forces in Okinawa and on the U.S. mainland, according to the "1998-2002 Defense Policy." The ministry published the report instead of a white paper.


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 181-182 next last
To: Sparta
I'm afraid that most of today's wussified feminized youth don't have the stones to fight a real war
81 posted on 12/27/2002 6:15:31 PM PST by clamper1797
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: 4Americaslove
But why is that, in your opinion?

It's a result of Nuke guilt.

Ever since we won WW II our home grown commie's (CommiecRATs & their leftest press,)
have been telling our children how terrible we were to use the Nuke.
Sadly, each generation believes that bs more than the previous one.

82 posted on 12/27/2002 6:17:25 PM PST by ASA Vet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: Gary Boldwater
"If the US gets stretched too thin, it's time for the nukes."

Time for the nukes - Yes! Thanks to delusional bastard Bill Clinton -
- - North Korea already has theirs - at the ready!

"Clinton Bankrolled North Korea's Nuke Program"
http://www.newsmax.com/showinsidecover.shtml?a=2002/10/17/80959

"Clinton Deal Gave N. Korea 100-Nuke-Per-Year Capacity"
http://www.newsmax.com/showinsidecover.shtml?a=2002/10/19/114657

83 posted on 12/27/2002 6:18:10 PM PST by WatchNKorea
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: RetiredArmy
If a draft were started, I seriously doubt 50% would show up.

It would appear that men like you and I would have to re-volunteer to defend our republic ... I would

84 posted on 12/27/2002 6:19:44 PM PST by clamper1797
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: clamper1797
If a draft were started the same percentage that showed up in 1965 would show up today. You underestimate today's young men. They are just as patriotic as you and I. It is easy to look at their clothes and music and lousy attitudes...but consider what our parents looked at in the 60's and 70's. I would suggest that hip-hop isnt as bad as disco!
85 posted on 12/27/2002 6:30:01 PM PST by Vermont Lt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: ALS
I don't agree with the IMF on that. I'd be willing to bet serious money on that.
86 posted on 12/27/2002 6:30:47 PM PST by gogeo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: cynicom
Can you fill me in on that

Sure, during the "cold war," we had two Corp in Germany.
VII Corp in the South, and V Corp in the North.
VII Corp was sent to Saudia for GW I. They were the Armor heavy force
which swept North into Iraq, and then East to flank the
Iraq Republican Guard Divisions, (The so called "hail Mary" manuver.)
Our guys kicked butt big time.
(Shortly after that the Soviet Union basically threw in the towel.
Guess they didn't like seeing what we had built up and planned for them.)
VII Corp was disbanded, and never returned to their bases in Germany.
V Corp will be going to kick butt this time.
That's why the Germans have been told they will have to guard the military bases in Germany.
IMO V Corp won't return to Germany either.

87 posted on 12/27/2002 6:35:25 PM PST by ASA Vet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: 4Americaslove
During WWII the majority of the people were more than willing to fight the enemy. I wonder what has happened to our population since then.

Seventy years of non-stop Liberalism plus worthless American/Western History education in the even more worthless (but prohibitively expensive) public schools and endless leftist hotbeds known as "Universities"!

88 posted on 12/27/2002 6:35:26 PM PST by Gritty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: Vermont Lt
Ummmm .... I was in the military in 69. I was in Vietnam in 72. Oh .... and I volunteered. From what I have heard from several young people that I have asked about the military is that they think it is a gigantic video game and not really prepared for life in the trenches should it come to that. Granted they may not be any less patriotic than the kids of the sixties BUT ... in the sixties it was still ok to play cowboys and indians or "army" in school ... if you get my drift
89 posted on 12/27/2002 6:39:39 PM PST by clamper1797
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: Dirk McQuickly
This would require conscription...

We had this type of "trained" force before Clinton "refined" our military.

90 posted on 12/27/2002 6:40:12 PM PST by scannell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
"Run out of Gas?" About 100 yards.
91 posted on 12/27/2002 6:41:39 PM PST by scannell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: clamper1797
"I'm afraid that most of today's wussified feminized youth don't have the stones to fight a real war."

I would tend to agree with you. Serving in an all volunteer part of an all volunteer Army, I can't think of anyone I know who would want to share the proverbial foxhole with someone who didn't want to be there. (The draft was over well before I was born, however, so I can't comment personally on the performance of draftees.)

This isn't to say that most people couldn't fight if they put their minds to it. It's just that sacrifice and duty aren't trendy enough for most Gen-Xers. It's bad enough we have so many in for the wrong reasons. I can think of a few people that will be in for a sad, sad flight across the Pacific, should it come to that, thinking 'I just wanted to pay off my college loans!"

92 posted on 12/27/2002 7:00:10 PM PST by Steel Wolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: Steel Wolf
I'm afraid it might come to that ... unfortunately most kids nowadays (except maybe the ghetto raised kids) don't have the emotional make-up to handle a 0300 MOS.
93 posted on 12/27/2002 7:04:59 PM PST by clamper1797
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: 4Americaslove
I don't know if you are aware of it, but you just took 5 paragraphs to say nothing. I have absolutely no idea what you are trying to say, if anything. Collect your thoughts and try again. If you have anything to say, that is.
94 posted on 12/27/2002 7:20:44 PM PST by templar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: RCW2001
This would require conscription...

Thank God for immigration.

Freedom isn't free.

95 posted on 12/27/2002 7:22:12 PM PST by Rome2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: clamper1797
No disagreement about the reality of what life is like under arms. However, I believe that many more would be willing to do what it takes than most old-fogey's like us think.

That said, playing guns was much more acceptable then--but a round or two of Quake is just as violent!
96 posted on 12/27/2002 7:24:49 PM PST by Vermont Lt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: Sparta
The volunteer age should be raised.

A lot of fathers will go in place of their sons.

Any able bodied man up to 45 should be able to go in place of their son.

One thing I can't begin to understand or abide is the concept of buying your way out(Civil war) or getting a college deferment (Vietnam).

What the hell is that all about?

No wonder there were protests against the draft in Vietnam.

No goddammned deferments.

If it takes a draft to keep us free, lets do it the right way this time.

97 posted on 12/27/2002 7:31:10 PM PST by Rome2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: templar
"I don't know if you are aware of it, but you just took 5 paragraphs to say nothing. I have absolutely no idea what you are trying to say, if anything. Collect your thoughts and try again. If you have anything to say, that is."

If I were allowed to freely express my toughts on these threads, I would.

A hint was give on para 1, but apparently you missed it.


98 posted on 12/27/2002 7:47:23 PM PST by 4Americaslove
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: the_doc
690000 is not ridiculous at all. Do you know how many troops it took just to halt the North Koreans by Pusan. It was a helluva lot more than the 35000 troops we have now.

Another poster mentioned artillery. The truth of the matter is the North Koreans have some 12,000-14,000 tubes (that's right, those numbers have three zeros) of artillery fixed in on South Korean and American positions. Some American outposts have 10 battalions worth of artillery targetted on them.

We're going to need to re-institute the draft, and big time. The Army barely has 8 combat divisions, and the Marine Corps 3. Anybody here who thinks we have enough forces to handle Iraq and North Korea both frankly don't know what the hell they are talking about.

99 posted on 12/27/2002 7:50:20 PM PST by fogarty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: John H K
Perhaps so, but you're seriously deluded if you think with the forces we have now we can handle both Iraq and North Korea simultaneously.

A draft may not be desirable, but it may be INEVITABLE.

100 posted on 12/27/2002 7:52:10 PM PST by fogarty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 181-182 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson