Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

HILLARY RODHAM Chosen to Give Democratic Party's Radio Response to Bush *** SATURDAY ***
San Francisco Chronicle ^ | 12/26/02 | TARA BURGHART, Associated Press Writer

Posted on 12/28/2002 1:16:04 AM PST by Joy Angela

Edited on 04/13/2004 2:41:35 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]


(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...


TOPICS: Activism/Chapters; Breaking News; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: address; bush; hillary; hughhewitt; newyork; radio
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-197 next last
Hillary Rodham VS President Bush

**ROUND ONE***

1 posted on 12/28/2002 1:16:04 AM PST by Joy Angela
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Carl/NewsMax; Matt Drudge; Judicial Watch; *Hugh Hewitt
TODAY

Hillary on the Radio Saturday Morning...

Following President Bush's Radio Address

The Democrats have chosen their LEADER.

2 posted on 12/28/2002 1:18:43 AM PST by Joy Angela
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ALOHA RONNIE; goldilucky; RonDog; Freedom'sWorthIt; Mudboy Slim
The Radio Waves will be CACKLING today!

Hillary Rodham on THE AIR!

3 posted on 12/28/2002 1:20:24 AM PST by Joy Angela
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Joy Angela
Suggested Freeper response to the Big Itches radio rant !

I, hardheaded cynic that I am, can't let Queen Hitlery Rob em Clintonista's misinformation and misguided arguments about revanchism go by without comment. As a preliminary, I want to break the mold and stray from the path of conventional wisdom. She says that her objectives are a breath of fresh air amid our modern culture's toxic cloud of chaos. What she means by this, of course, is that she wants free reign to encourage a deadly acceptance of intolerance.

Her writings are a field of misspellings and misprisions for a variety of reasons. For instance, she should work with us, not step in at the eleventh hour and hog all the glory.

It is important to differentiate between incompetent heretics and officious voluptuaries who, in a variety of ways, have been lured by Hitlery's contemptible biases, or who have ended up wittingly or unwittingly in coalitions with Hitlery's devotees, or who maintain contact with Hitlery as part of serious and legitimate research. For your information, I can't let her replace the search for truth with a situationist relativism based on hypocritical mandarinism. I always catch hell whenever I say something like that, so let me assure you that after hearing about her blockish attempts to convert lush forests into arid deserts, I was saddened. I was saddened that she has lowered herself to this level. Not only have fatuous, inane nobodies decided to glorify their prevarications by dressing them up as moral and righteous prerogatives, but their fairy tales are being debated as though they were actually reasonable. With Hitlery's fibs hanging over us like the Sword of Damocles, it makes sense that if Hitlery is victorious in her quest to preach a propaganda of hate, then her crown will be the funeral wreath of humanity. Imagine people everywhere embracing her claim that cannibalism, wife-swapping, and the murder of infants and the elderly are acceptable behavior. The idea defies the imagination.

It has been, and is, my great undertaking to study the problem and recommend corrective action. Let me recap that for you, because it really is extraordinarily important: Her goals are not normal. Now, that's a strong conclusion to draw just from the evidence I've presented in this letter. So let me corroborate it by saying that Hitlery thinks that the majority of dirty antagonists are heroes, if not saints. Of course, thinking so doesn't make it so. I could substantiate what I'm saying about dim-witted simple-minded-types, but I don't feel that that's necessary, since we all know what they're like. If I, not being one of the many abysmal, rotten vendors of phallocentrism of this world, weren't so forgiving, I'd have to say that we must comment on Hitlery's pronouncements. Our children depend on that.

If you're still reading this letter, I wish to compliment you for being sufficiently open-minded to understand that Hitlery argues that the federal government should take more and more of our hard-earned money and more and more of our hard-won rights. To maintain this thesis, Hitlery naturally has had to shovel away a mountain of evidence, which she does by the desperate expedient of claiming that her theories epitomize wholesome family entertainment. We mustn't let her ascribe opinions to me that I don't even hold. That would be like letting the Mafia serve as a new national police force in Italy. Though many people agree that we must work together against denominationalism, obstructionism, deconstructionism, etc., Hitlery has stated that space aliens are out to lay eggs in our innards or ooze their alien hell-slime all over us. That's just pure communism. Well, in Hitlery's case, it might be pure ignorance, seeing that Hitlery's reasoning is circular and therefore invalid. In other words, she always begins an argument with her conclusion (e.g., that doing the fashionable thing is more important than life or liberty) and therefore -- not surprisingly -- she always arrives at that very conclusion.

I must ask that her cronies lead her out of a dream world and back to hard reality. I know they'll never do that, so here's an alternate proposal: They should, at the very least, back off and quit trying to win support by encapsulating frustrations and directing them toward unpopular scapegoats. Hitlery's epithets are so mean-spirited that if allowed to go unanswered, their final cost would be incalculable.

Whenever there's an argument about Hitlery's devotion to principles and to freedom, all one has to do is point out that Hitlery doesn't give a damn about any of us. That should settle the argument pretty quickly. Once people obtain the critical skills that enable them to think and reflect and speculate independently, they'll realize that most of you reading this letter have your hearts in the right place. Now follow your hearts with actions. I, hardheaded cynic that I am, unquestionably think that the present controversy demands honest dialogue, not crude attempts at demonization. My views, of course, are not the issue here. The issue is that that fact is simply inescapable to any thinking man or woman. "Thinking" is the key word in the previous sentence.

I wouldn't want to disguise the complexity of color, the brutality of class, and the importance of religion and sexual identity in the construction and practice of negativism. I would, on the other hand, love to identify, challenge, defy, disrupt, and, finally, destroy the institutions that violate Hitlery's pledge not to turn peaceful gatherings into embarrassing scandals. But, hey, I'm already doing that with this letter. I will never give up. I will never stop trying. And I will use every avenue possible to work together towards a shared vision.

Since their emergence on the stage of history, hectoring freaks of nature have been a parasitic growth on the stem of true citizens, by which I mean that the pen is a powerful tool. Why don't we use that tool to straighten out Hitlery's thinking? For the sake of concreteness: Hitlery's personal attacks are a load of bunk. I use this delightfully pejorative term, "bunk" -- an alternative from the same page of my criminal-slang lexicon would serve just as well -- because Hitlery's acolytes all have serious personal problems. In fact, the way she keeps them loyal to her is by encouraging and exacerbating these problems rather than by helping to overcome them. It's really not bloody-mindedness that compels me to take a strong position on Hitlery's sophistries, which, after all, encourage young people to break all the rules, cut themselves loose from their roots, and adopt an abusive lifestyle . It's my sense of responsibility to you, the reader.

The majority of rapacious whiners probably agree that the moral devastations that accompany Hitlery's effrontive conclusions suffice to slowly but surely shower nefarious, bumptious twaddlers with undeserved praise. I've said that before and I've said it often, but perhaps I haven't been concrete enough or specific enough, so now I'll try to remedy those shortcomings. I'll try to be a lot more specific and concrete when I explain that if the people generally are relying on false information sown by amoral hedonists, then correcting that situation becomes a priority for the defense of our nation. My argument is that Hitlery assigns blame to everyone but herself. Ridiculous? Not so. I hate her constant misuse of historical analogies, and every intellectually honest person knows it. In short, Queen Hitlery Rob em Clintonista's toadies assume that because they look a certain way or come from a certain background, they have an inalienable right to make my worst nightmares come true.

Stay Safe :o)

4 posted on 12/28/2002 1:32:24 AM PST by Squantos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ppaul; truth_seeker; JohnHuang2; kattracks; nopardons; TLBSHOW; RLK; Clinton Is Scum; Alamo-Girl; ..
Saturday SHOWDOWN!

*** HILLARY RODHAM **VS** PRESIDENT BUSH ***

Does anyone know where to tune in and WHAT TIME???

WHERE DO WE GO TO LISTEN TO HILLARY'S Response???

This is what I've found so far...

http://www.republicanradio.com/

Republican Radio is proud to present
PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH'S Saturday address
5 posted on 12/28/2002 1:35:07 AM PST by Joy Angela
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Joy Angela
"The Democrats have chosen their LEADER."

Yes, treasonous Chinagate bitch that she is!

6 posted on 12/28/2002 1:35:30 AM PST by WatchNKorea
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Squantos
Hillary Rodham

How do we love thee?

Rod'em, Rotten, Roehm

A flower by any other name would smell just the same.

7 posted on 12/28/2002 1:37:25 AM PST by Joy Angela
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: WatchNKorea
She-Beast is on the warpath..

Ironically... EXACTLY 666 months after Hitler killed
himself, Hillary Rodham was elected to the Senate.

55 1/2 years later...

The power of the BEAST did RISE again.

8 posted on 12/28/2002 1:40:06 AM PST by Joy Angela
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Dog; dirtboy; Miss Marple; Poohbah; Mo1; sweetliberty; Defender2
Hillary's ATTACK

BEGINS
9 posted on 12/28/2002 1:50:34 AM PST by Joy Angela
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Joy Angela

10 posted on 12/28/2002 2:00:11 AM PST by Cindy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cindy; All
Crazy with the DESIRE FOR POWER, for sure!!

I can't find where to LISTEN to Hillary's response!

Any help on this one, Freepers???

11 posted on 12/28/2002 2:04:21 AM PST by Joy Angela
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Joy Angela
I can't find where to LISTEN to Hillary's response!

I DON'T want to LISTEN to her response! Huge BARF alert! Just more of her dribble & lies!

12 posted on 12/28/2002 2:20:36 AM PST by blondee123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: blondee123
This Head-on-Attack

**CONFIRMS**

HILLARY ***is*** Running in 2004




13 posted on 12/28/2002 2:31:30 AM PST by Joy Angela
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Joy Angela
I know it's wrong to wish someone ill, but I hope she steps in front of a bus. And that it's on a film we can watch over and over again.
14 posted on 12/28/2002 2:52:47 AM PST by Joe Boucher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joy Angela
Like a dead lily.
15 posted on 12/28/2002 3:14:17 AM PST by starboardside
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Joy Angela
Hmmmm, I wonder if she will address this weeks actions by the N. Koreans? If I remember correctly, she and Billy-Bob were buddies with them. I wonder if the N. Koreans are still sending campaign cash to Hitlary? GW's address ought to highlight the failure of the past administration regarding N. Korea.....
16 posted on 12/28/2002 3:25:22 AM PST by eeriegeno
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joy Angela
The Democrats are still the Party Of Clinton. They couldn't have chosen a better spokesperson to show America their real face on Saturday.
17 posted on 12/28/2002 3:27:10 AM PST by goldstategop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
Their face. Like a real mooning they did to our country, and especially to our military.
18 posted on 12/28/2002 3:30:55 AM PST by starboardside
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Joy Angela
Her lips may be moving, but my ears won't be listening!
19 posted on 12/28/2002 3:34:24 AM PST by Highest Authority
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joy Angela; Mia T; Miss Marple; Howlin; ohioWfan; rintense
The entire U.S. is her Naboth's vineyard. Her husband will do what he has to do to get it for her. That will include having many in their fold testify falsely against our honorable president.
20 posted on 12/28/2002 3:43:12 AM PST by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-197 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson