Suggested Freeper response to the Big Itches radio rant !
I, hardheaded cynic that I am, can't let Queen Hitlery Rob em Clintonista's misinformation and misguided arguments about revanchism go by without comment. As a preliminary, I want to break the mold and stray from the path of conventional wisdom. She says that her objectives are a breath of fresh air amid our modern culture's toxic cloud of chaos. What she means by this, of course, is that she wants free reign to encourage a deadly acceptance of intolerance.
Her writings are a field of misspellings and misprisions for a variety of reasons. For instance, she should work with us, not step in at the eleventh hour and hog all the glory.
It is important to differentiate between incompetent heretics and officious voluptuaries who, in a variety of ways, have been lured by Hitlery's contemptible biases, or who have ended up wittingly or unwittingly in coalitions with Hitlery's devotees, or who maintain contact with Hitlery as part of serious and legitimate research. For your information, I can't let her replace the search for truth with a situationist relativism based on hypocritical mandarinism. I always catch hell whenever I say something like that, so let me assure you that after hearing about her blockish attempts to convert lush forests into arid deserts, I was saddened. I was saddened that she has lowered herself to this level. Not only have fatuous, inane nobodies decided to glorify their prevarications by dressing them up as moral and righteous prerogatives, but their fairy tales are being debated as though they were actually reasonable. With Hitlery's fibs hanging over us like the Sword of Damocles, it makes sense that if Hitlery is victorious in her quest to preach a propaganda of hate, then her crown will be the funeral wreath of humanity. Imagine people everywhere embracing her claim that cannibalism, wife-swapping, and the murder of infants and the elderly are acceptable behavior. The idea defies the imagination.
It has been, and is, my great undertaking to study the problem and recommend corrective action. Let me recap that for you, because it really is extraordinarily important: Her goals are not normal. Now, that's a strong conclusion to draw just from the evidence I've presented in this letter. So let me corroborate it by saying that Hitlery thinks that the majority of dirty antagonists are heroes, if not saints. Of course, thinking so doesn't make it so. I could substantiate what I'm saying about dim-witted simple-minded-types, but I don't feel that that's necessary, since we all know what they're like. If I, not being one of the many abysmal, rotten vendors of phallocentrism of this world, weren't so forgiving, I'd have to say that we must comment on Hitlery's pronouncements. Our children depend on that.
If you're still reading this letter, I wish to compliment you for being sufficiently open-minded to understand that Hitlery argues that the federal government should take more and more of our hard-earned money and more and more of our hard-won rights. To maintain this thesis, Hitlery naturally has had to shovel away a mountain of evidence, which she does by the desperate expedient of claiming that her theories epitomize wholesome family entertainment. We mustn't let her ascribe opinions to me that I don't even hold. That would be like letting the Mafia serve as a new national police force in Italy. Though many people agree that we must work together against denominationalism, obstructionism, deconstructionism, etc., Hitlery has stated that space aliens are out to lay eggs in our innards or ooze their alien hell-slime all over us. That's just pure communism. Well, in Hitlery's case, it might be pure ignorance, seeing that Hitlery's reasoning is circular and therefore invalid. In other words, she always begins an argument with her conclusion (e.g., that doing the fashionable thing is more important than life or liberty) and therefore -- not surprisingly -- she always arrives at that very conclusion.
I must ask that her cronies lead her out of a dream world and back to hard reality. I know they'll never do that, so here's an alternate proposal: They should, at the very least, back off and quit trying to win support by encapsulating frustrations and directing them toward unpopular scapegoats. Hitlery's epithets are so mean-spirited that if allowed to go unanswered, their final cost would be incalculable.
Whenever there's an argument about Hitlery's devotion to principles and to freedom, all one has to do is point out that Hitlery doesn't give a damn about any of us. That should settle the argument pretty quickly. Once people obtain the critical skills that enable them to think and reflect and speculate independently, they'll realize that most of you reading this letter have your hearts in the right place. Now follow your hearts with actions. I, hardheaded cynic that I am, unquestionably think that the present controversy demands honest dialogue, not crude attempts at demonization. My views, of course, are not the issue here. The issue is that that fact is simply inescapable to any thinking man or woman. "Thinking" is the key word in the previous sentence.
I wouldn't want to disguise the complexity of color, the brutality of class, and the importance of religion and sexual identity in the construction and practice of negativism. I would, on the other hand, love to identify, challenge, defy, disrupt, and, finally, destroy the institutions that violate Hitlery's pledge not to turn peaceful gatherings into embarrassing scandals. But, hey, I'm already doing that with this letter. I will never give up. I will never stop trying. And I will use every avenue possible to work together towards a shared vision.
Since their emergence on the stage of history, hectoring freaks of nature have been a parasitic growth on the stem of true citizens, by which I mean that the pen is a powerful tool. Why don't we use that tool to straighten out Hitlery's thinking? For the sake of concreteness: Hitlery's personal attacks are a load of bunk. I use this delightfully pejorative term, "bunk" -- an alternative from the same page of my criminal-slang lexicon would serve just as well -- because Hitlery's acolytes all have serious personal problems. In fact, the way she keeps them loyal to her is by encouraging and exacerbating these problems rather than by helping to overcome them. It's really not bloody-mindedness that compels me to take a strong position on Hitlery's sophistries, which, after all, encourage young people to break all the rules, cut themselves loose from their roots, and adopt an abusive lifestyle . It's my sense of responsibility to you, the reader.
The majority of rapacious whiners probably agree that the moral devastations that accompany Hitlery's effrontive conclusions suffice to slowly but surely shower nefarious, bumptious twaddlers with undeserved praise. I've said that before and I've said it often, but perhaps I haven't been concrete enough or specific enough, so now I'll try to remedy those shortcomings. I'll try to be a lot more specific and concrete when I explain that if the people generally are relying on false information sown by amoral hedonists, then correcting that situation becomes a priority for the defense of our nation. My argument is that Hitlery assigns blame to everyone but herself. Ridiculous? Not so. I hate her constant misuse of historical analogies, and every intellectually honest person knows it. In short, Queen Hitlery Rob em Clintonista's toadies assume that because they look a certain way or come from a certain background, they have an inalienable right to make my worst nightmares come true.
Stay Safe :o)
30% of registered Dems want Hillary to run for prez versus 13% maximum for other candidates. We need to start an organized campaign at FR to make sure if she runs, she isn't elected. Letters to the editors of various newspapers are a good start. Archiving articles for future reference when writing such letters is another. Let's all bookmark Hillary articles, comments, voting record, etc. for ease in writing those letters.
BUMP!
- She's just what we need.
- For 8 years, the Arkansas rubes couldn't figure out how to spell t-e-r-r-o-r-i-s-m.
-
- You democrats must be really desperate--
- to make that horrid, one-trick harpy the face of your party...
- Or is it the FBI files?
- Is it the cash?
- (Do the calculations. It's not worth it.)
-
- Every bark of that rabid, old dog is amateurish, banal, obvious.
- We couldn't do more to energize our base and win over independents.
Thank you, democrats!
- KEEP REMINDING THE VOTERS THAT YOU ARE THE PARTY OF CLINTON.
- KEEP ON KEEPING THE RABID, OLD DOG OUT FRONT. PLEASE...
|
HILLARY CLINTON, DESIGNATED DEMOCRAT ATTACK DOG, MAKES HER DEBUT by Mia T
 ASHINGTON, Dec. 24-- hillary clinton, designated democrat attack dog, debuted this week. The position, a self-appointment, was seconded exuberantly by her husband, the impeached ex-ersatz president and serial rapist, who puffed, "The assorted contusions about my face and head over the years are a testament to hillary's expertise in this area."
Many have posited that so too are the bodies littering the clinton landscape.
-
-
Designated democrat attack dog turns up the heat
Within days of the democrat election debacle of '02, it was announced anonymously that clinton would assume this attack-dog role; her charge, ostensibly, was to teach the feckless democrat losers how to attack the GOP. The covert scheme, however, was to sic clinton on the democrats, as well; that is to say, clinton was to mark her territory early. If the covert scheme was lost on the senators, the irony of the assignment was not. Members from both sides of the aisle were overheard in the cloakroom muttering that the democrat debacle was entirely traceable to the clintons, to their corruption, to their ineptitude, to their tired tactics, ultimately, to their failure to confront the terrorism. On Monday clinton turned up the heat. She demanded a congressional investigation into what she called "recent incidents of voter suppression and intimidation," fueling the widely held belief that the clintons are attempting to race-bait themselves back into the Oval Office. An unnamed source close to the democrat leadership revealed that many democrats have concluded that the clintons are destroying the party. He added that if the opposition fails to expose the clintons' real record on race, the democrats will do it themselves.
Racial and ethnic disrespect and exploitation have always been an essential element in the clinton playbook.
-
-
- In the senate race against Rick Lazio, it is widely understood that the "drag and drop," (followed by the OLD ANGLE / NEW SQUARE / OVAL OFFICE SCHEME ) was clinton's vote fraud technique of choice used to overcome her low poll numbers, high personal negatives and consistent public failures.
-
|
-
- Thou art arm'd that hath thy crook'd schemers straight.
- Cudgel thy brains no more, the clinton plots are great.
-
Mia T, On Neutered and Neutering, -
by Mia T and Edward Zehr (EZ)
|
Kissing Mrs ARABrat. How many babies are you responsible for killing in Israel, Mrs. HELLary? Any N.Korean $ in HELLary's campaign contributions. I'm willing to bet there are.
Probably the best summing up of the Clintonista's view of the citizens of America. She honestly believes she can win a Presidential election using mudslinging, stonewalling, funeral rallies that turn into Grateful Dead concerts, manipulating the media by getting putzes like Matthews to lob softballs at her, presubmitted questions for any interview, fraudulent voting practices, 900 FBI files, the list goes on and on. You see, for the Clintonistas, an election isnt about being popular enough to get people to vote for you, its all consuming process involving, polls, exit polls, internal polls, fraud, deceit, busloads of St Louis and Milwaukee homeless, and THAT list goes on and on as well.
We need to brace ourselves for one of the dirtiest elections to date; the clintonistas have fired up Election 2004, it starts today with a radio address. And weak stomachs need not apply.
Good post Squantos.
Hillary is protected by the devil himself. She is his.
"Rapacious whiners" is an excellent term for the yellow-wolverine Democrats.
