HILLARY RODHAM Chosen to Give Democratic Party's Radio Response to Bush *** SATURDAY ***

San Francisco Chronicle ^ | 12/26/02 | TARA BURGHART, Associated Press Writer

[az wildkitten]

God forgive me.

[Big Horn]

I am not sure it is good to mix a sex symbol with politics.

[jrlc]

Kissing Mrs ARABrat. How many babies are you responsible for killing in Israel, Mrs. HELLary? Any N.Korean $ in HELLary's campaign contributions. I'm willing to bet there are.

[Piquaboy]

If I wanted to listen to a brain dead idiot, I would record myself giving a speech on something I did not know anything about, which is what this piece of crap senator will be doing.

[Mia T]

The Fran Lebowitz Method of

Auto-Disenfranchisement:

 

 

Forty-nine-year-old writer Fran Lebowitz was perturbed about Hillary Clinton's all-but-certain Senate run. She had already made up her mind to vote for Mrs. Clinton but, she said, she was still unhappy. "I feel it's a personal plot," she said. "I feel like she personally sat down and said, 'How could I possibly get Fran Lebowitz to vote for me? I have to run against Giuliani.'"

 

Ms. Lebowitz wasn't finished. "I think she's a very poor role model for girls," she said. "I believe she's someone who decided at a young age that 'I want to be President, but I can't, because I'm a girl. So I'll marry the President.' I think that's so regressive." She paused for breath. "She's a poll-taker, she's a pulse-taker, she's not a leader. She doesn't really seem to have any ideas" And then she comes here and panders."

Meet the Smart New York Women Who Can't Stand Hillary Clinton,

The New York Observer, JANUARY 17, 2000

 

 

Writer Fran Lebowitz's witless justification -- her famous bons mots notwithstanding -- for voting for hillary clinton, someone she regards with utter contempt, reveals the insidious process by which classes of voters become auto-disenfranchised.

 

The "Liberal Professional Woman" could not do more to render herself powerless than to adopt Lebowitz's reflexive groupthink and vote for this horrific, corrupt phony. Blind allegiance of this sort has already auto-disenfranchised blacks and homosexuals --and, to some extent, Jews. (The Democratic Party knows it need not do anything. . .and the Republican Party knows there is nothing it can do. . .to obtain the loyalty of these groups.)

 

Groupthink, it should be understood, damages not only the group that practices it. Groupthink damages society as a whole. Indeed, it is precisely this sort of simplistic non-analysis that produced a lawless, rapist president, a lawless, co-rapist consort, a corrupted society, a confused, violent generation, an eviscerated national defense.

 

 

 

YOO-HOO Mrs. clinton:

THE CLINTON RAPES ARE

 

"UNBECOMING"

 

Q ERTY3

"YOU KNOW"

zipper-hoisted

PRENUP/POST-RAPE SENATE SEAT

clinton Complex-Question Fallacy Scheme

 

 _{rodham-clinton} ^{reality-check}

Democrat Debacle of '02

Q ERTY8

BUMP!

[Trueblackman]

I say that every Republican and Conservative here should be working overtime to take this witch down and end any dream of this big government socialist has of running for Presdent. I say we should launch a effoert to dig up every piece of dirt on Hillary Clinton and here connections to Anti-American Groups as well.

[jws3sticks]

She is as good as her word...

There is a big Rat line-up at their favorite KFC.

She'll do anything to get elected...

My thoughts exactly.

With BillyBlob off bonking Demi, HRC will be free of a big dead weight. Scary!

She'll pony up with her kissing cousin...

While the true believers in American Freedom have the last laugh.

Let's hope so, anyway.

[Mia T]

BUMP!

Clearly someone should notify America's founders that they have erred... men are not deserving of self goverment, because clearly self government is nothing more than the aggregation of all our psychic traumas and libidinal confusions.. and look where that has gotten us...one Clinton leaving the white house and one aiming for the US Senate for the State of New York... perhaps the liberals ARE onto something? But no, study the last two Clinton elections carefully... this most shameless and shameful American President is the product of plurality (less than majority) votes obtained through the gile and intrigue of an elitist cabal of intellectually impaired and ethically corrupt media manipulators aligned in effect with the electoral tampering of one man, H. Ross Perot, who although he occasionally gave a good speech was still intelligent enough to know his only role was to twice deny the conservative majority of American voters a first choice for President.

Gail Wynand, "Be Liberal, Live in Ignorance and Servitude"

LUCINDA FRANKS: I think you're wrong because, after about two years of -- of working on this, you know, on and off, I think the president -- that the teenage culture caused the president's behavior in the way he behaved in -- with the oral sex.

 

BILL O'REILLY: I think you're crazy, Ms. Franks, with all due respect.

Fellating Kids and clinton Degeneracy: The Revisionism Begins

 

 

"Be Liberal, Live in Ignorance and Servitude"

by Gail Wynand

liberals have always had problems figuring out causation. they believe for example that because people who smoke (sometimes) have higher rates of cancer than people who don't that smoking CAUSES cancer, worse, they believe that if people get cancer it is the fault of the "tobacco companies" (ie caused by the manufactures of tobacco products). They further believe that the remedy for this fault is that billions of dollars in "damages" should be transferred from the wealth of stockholders in tobacco companies to a handful of plaintiffs lawyers including the First lady's relatives and others closely associated with the Democratic party. And they believe, apparently, that if young people are now experimenting with sex at early ages and with more profoundly explicit practices than in past years, and that if the President of the United States decides to enroll a young intern in rendition of such services to his middle aged libido resultantly staining both her dress and Americas reputation, that a spontaneous wave of teenage sex experimentation, sucked (sorry) the poor middle aged chief executive into its vortex.

deducing causation in most events takes deliberate, focused, thought, insight, and a disciplined intelligence that doesnt skip foundational indoctrination (aka actually studying in school). Causation of the diseases associated with cancer is highly complex and to a large degree still unknown. That smoking is probably not healty for you is well known. That a middle aged chief executive, Yale Law School graduate, former professor of Constitutional Law and State Attorney General should be responsible and accountable for his own actions including HIS perjury and obstruction of justice would seem axiomatic to all but a liberal who has the capacity to adopt causationally convenient theories based solely on tangential proximity to the event under examination rather than through any rational analysis of the importance or significance of the asserted cause to the event. Thus, "guns" are used in some murders therefore, to a liberal all "guns" should be either banned or kept in locked safes with trigger locks so as to disarm the law abiding public and eviscerate their legally recognized right to effective self defense.

Quite simply, one has to be pretty stupid or very corrupt or both to be a liberal, at least and for sure to be a Clinton supporter. But it is worse than that, one also has to deny the importance of human conciousness and free will. That is, a Clinton defending liberal apparently believes that childhood psychic trauma, teenage sex trends (remarkably and largely only rampant among the social classes targeted by liberals for social intervention for the past 40 years) and the power of "addiction" which used to be considered merely "habituation" in more stalwart times, are more significant than free will in determining human conduct.

Clearly someone should notify America's founders that they have erred... men are not deserving of self goverment, because clearly self government is nothing more than the aggregation of all our psychic traumas and libidinal confusions.. and look where that has gotten us...one Clinton leaving the white house and one aiming for the US Senate for the State of New York... perhaps the liberals ARE onto something? But no, study the last two Clinton elections carefully... this most shameless and shameful American President is the product of plurality (less than majority) votes obtained through the gile and intrigue of an elitist cabal of intellectually impaired and ethically corrupt media manipulators aligned in effect with the electoral tampering of one man, H. Ross Perot, who although he occasionally gave a good speech was still intelligent enough to know his only role was to twice deny the conservative majority of American voters a first choice for President. And now even as Evita determinedly grasps for the Security Power and Influence of the Senate seat, one sees in her early campaigning the overriding awareness that her only hope is the sowing of confusion and ignorance... the demonization of a long time public servant whose accomplishments are towering, the pandering to the lowest and most depraved and corrupt anti social organizations and figures (no not the mob, the teachers unions and Mr. Sharpton). Arm in arm this body of liberal enthusiasts march forth to assure that America continues to be contaminated and disabled by their control of government into the 21st century... arrogantly and in complete disregard of truth, rationality, or the notion of liberty... they pound at the very gates of freedom, threatening to burn (redefine to mean the opposite of what they say) the Constitution, the Declaration of Independence and the Gettysburg Address and replace them with their own Orwellian Banners of "community" "children" "education" "fairness" and all the other focus group tested liberal-illogicisms. But the translation exists and when the alien identifying sunglasses are donned all of their slogans can be seen to read "Be Liberal, Live in Ignorance and Servitude"

 

[tuna_battle]

"HILLARY ***is*** Running in 2004"

If she runs in 2004, she will be, in 2006, where Algore is now. I can't see her running in '04 -- it would muck up her chance in '08. Once a loser; always a loser. Just ask Mondale.

[M Kehoe]

#4

Good, insight filled rant. Imho.

5.56mm

[Peach]

I'm with you. We should start an archive of Hillary's voting record, statements, etc. and be very active in exposing her via your television appearances on Fox and letters to editors of major newspapers.

[cardinal4]

Probably the best summing up of the Clintonista's view of the citizens of America. She honestly believes she can win a Presidential election using mudslinging, stonewalling, funeral rallies that turn into Grateful Dead concerts, manipulating the media by getting putzes like Matthews to lob softballs at her, presubmitted questions for any interview, fraudulent voting practices, 900 FBI files, the list goes on and on. You see, for the Clintonistas, an election isnt about being popular enough to get people to vote for you, its all consuming process involving, polls, exit polls, internal polls, fraud, deceit, busloads of St Louis and Milwaukee homeless, and THAT list goes on and on as well.

We need to brace ourselves for one of the dirtiest elections to date; the clintonistas have fired up Election 2004, it starts today with a radio address. And weak stomachs need not apply.

Good post Squantos.

[M Kehoe]

Gail Wynand bump.

5.56mm

[lonestar]

How long will the media let Hillary make statements before they pressure her to answer questions?

When she wants to; not before.

[tuna_battle]

"Will American's fall for these narcisistic pair again? I say yes....it's happened before....twice....."

I respectfully disagree. It's a different world now. Would Hillary have been elected as Junior Senator, if 9/11 happened before her Senate campaign? Not a chance. Not showing up for even one funeral of a common person killed at the WTC will come back to haunt her forever. New Yorkers will not forget that.

I would like to think that most Americans now have the knowledge that, in the 90's, it was Clinton who sissified the military, slashed budgets for the CIA, FBI, etc. Going forward, I think the majority of active American voters are going to vote for the party which believes in strong defense.

Just my opinion... As always, I could be wrong.

[linn37]

wow real exciting I'm sure all 100 listeners will hang on her every word!

[harpo11]

I wouldn't waste one precious second of my life listening to this very unlikeable joyless sourpuss old prune even if I was forced to hear her obnoxious snotty voice smear my great country and my President.

Heck, I'd listen to her old man, the philandeering impeached cigar abuser before I'd listen to her blithering squawking.

If I truly was interested in hearing what the cantankerous biddy has to say I'd read Marx or Lenin but that is no way to spend the last Saturday of this wonderful year.

[Joy Angela]

Know thy enemy!

[Joy Angela]

http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2002/12/20021228.html

Here is the transcript of President Bush's radio address.

Did I miss it? It's 7am PT...I thought that the speech was at 10 am ET so I'm bummed.

[Peach]

I thought it was typically 10 a.m. EST too. What's the deal?