Posted on 12/31/2002 12:53:44 AM PST by twntaipan
As evangelical Christian emissaries have spread throughout the Muslim world, their presence has increasingly proved to be a lightning rod for anti-American sentiment while provoking the anger of native Christian sects and Islamic clerics.
The murder of three American missionaries yesterday at the hospital where they worked in Yemen, and the killing of another American missionary in southern Lebanon in November, underscored the dangers of working at the intersection of religion and politics.
The negative reaction is not limited to Muslim countries, but has been seen in Hindu-dominated nations like India, where a Christian missionary family was burned to death in an attack three years ago.
"With the rise of religious politics, missionaries come into the cross hairs of Muslim and Hindu fundamentalists," said Bernard Haykel, an assistant professor of Middle Eastern studies and history at New York University. "Certainly as the Arab and Muslim world has become more radicalized Islamically, people have become more aware of missionaries and more irritated by them."
Christian missionaries have been active across much of the Muslim Middle East for hundreds of years, at least as far back as the Crusades.
But successive generations of missionaries found that proselytizing to Muslims was a dangerous business. Under Muslim law, conversion from Islam is punishable by death.
Rather than enrage local authorities and risk their own deaths or expulsions, missionaries aimed for softer targets. American Protestant missionaries in the 19th century, for example, built universities and hospitals and tried to convert Coptic Christians in Egypt and Greek Orthodox Christians in Lebanon.
The Orthodox and Coptic churches, which have lived among Muslims for centuries, know how to cultivate their own flocks without threatening the political territory of Muslim rulers and clerics. The newly arrived evangelical Christian groups, in the view of these older indigenous churches, trample the unwritten rules.
In Lebanon, the Roman Catholic diocese and Muslim groups have accused the evangelical Christians of trying to convert Muslims. One bishop said Bonnie Penner Witherall, the missionary killed by a gunman last month, combined preaching about Christianity with the distribution of toys and food to Muslim children.
When the Taliban rulers of Afghanistan arrested eight Western evangelical Christian aid workers in 2001, they made similar accusations, saying the workers had been distributing Christian literature and should be killed. The eight were freed during the American attack on the Taliban, and later one acknowledged that they had shown Afghans a film about Jesus.
Proselytizing sects like the Southern Baptist Convention, which owns the hospital in Jibla, Yemen, where the missionaries were killed, have said they do not actively seek to convert people if prohibited by government authorities.
Jerry Rankin, president of the International Mission Board, which runs the missionary activities of the Southern Baptists, asserted that the missionaries in Jibla promoted Christianity by example.
"Our people naturally do respect the religious beliefs of others," said Mr. Rankin, "and they try to relate to people in a loving way through friendships and relationships."
Still, the hospital has not avoided entanglement in Yemen's religious politics. In 1995 it was accused by Islah, an opposition political party, of defaming Islam and proselytizing among Yemen's Muslims.
Although a court dismissed the charges, the incendiary message of the lawsuit was not lost on some of its local backers. The State Department, in its reports on human rights in Yemen, said Muslim hospital employees continued to be harassed by Islah members for several years.
More recently the number of volunteer missionaries has exploded, with some 7,000 college and high school students signing up for short-term evangelical missions overseas.
The Mission Board's Web site also boasts of a record number of baptisms — 395,773 so far this year — as a result of its foreign missionary work. "There is discussion on strategy changes, to become less institutional and to work primarily in church-planting and face-to-face evangelism," said Jack Graham, a Texas pastor and current president of the Southern Baptist Convention. "When you're up close and personal with someone hopefully they will believe in you."
In accordance with that strategy, Pastor Graham said, the Baptists have already decided to turn over their hospital in Yemen to a local Muslim group and shift resources to mobile clinics that would bring missionaries into contact with more Yemenis.
The missionaries who have died are martyrs, the pastor said. "This is not a conflict between religions but a conflict between God and Satan, between good and evil," he said. "We want to be sensitive to the political climate. We certainly want to work with governments where our missions have been placed and we don't want to create a political/religious crisis. But as far as the Southern Baptists are concerned, we will continue to express our love for God."
If they really think that's all it takes to "provoke" someone and thereby justify killing, then Howell Raines is a complete sociopath. Raines knows better, but his hatred of Christians is obviously much greater than his love of justice.
Bingo!
But because, by violence, the missionaries were forced to stop, they are rquired to be silent for all time? NYT shallow thinking at work (work?) again.
Jehovah's Witnesses are not Evangelicals. They don't believe in the divinity of Christ, and thus can only be considered "christian" only when using a broad cultural definition.
That statement alone proves how little you know us. Yet, you are comfortable in judging us and our faith. How truly sad that is.
That pretty much says it all.
I'm sorry, but I must disagree. Nothing in Scripture contradicts the teachings of the Orthodox Church (although we do not line up with the scriptural interpretations of some sects - particulary those who keep inventing new teachings).
Read the scripture for yourself and come to your own conclusion about truth.
I think seeking out the truth is a little more complex then simply trusting in my own personal interpretation. The Bible tells us that there is no prophecy (literally truth) in such interpretations.
I prefer to combine my study of scripture with the study of the Church fathers so that I can know how the church taught the scriptures from the very beginning. It's a wonderful defense against modern reinterpretation!
Demanding that He do so is the equivalent of challenging God, in my opinion. And then there are those who claim to be so guided but come up with new interpretations (but are actually just the repitition of centuries-old heresies).
There is no truth in personal interpretation.
He is also willing to do so through His Church.
I'm sorry, but relying on my own interpretation sounds as if I'm setting myself up as my own personal infallible Pope. Scripture warns us against that behavior.
Actually, I don't believe there is such a thing as an infallible human. That's why I would never trust my own personal interpretation of Scripture. It is much better for me to look upon the total of the writings of the Church Fathers for assistance.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.