Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

California's New Laws (The good, bad, ugly and silly)
Los Angeles Daily News ^ | January 02, 2003 | Editorial

Posted on 01/03/2003 12:41:54 PM PST by Mark

California's new laws

The good, bad, ugly and silly

Thursday, January 02, 2003 - California's legislators might have failed to balance the state budget last year, but that doesn't mean they weren't busy.

Although they neglected the state's most pressing concerns, state leaders tackled most every other issue imaginable, with the Legislature passing and Gov. Gray Davis approving 1,168 bills in 2002.

Now that 2003 has arrived, those laws have gone into effect.

First, there's the good news:

Last year, state lawmakers passed new restrictions on junk faxes, e-mail spam and unsolicited pages to personal pagers, thus curbing an ever-increasing annoyance. They also passed a California "Laura's Law," which allows families to request 180 days of court-ordered treatment for relatives with serious mental illnesses.

Then, there's the bad news, which in California means legislation rooted in good intentions, but with the potential for disastrous results:

Topping the list is California's newly expanded family leave law, which imposes a tax on all workers so that some can take as many as 12 weeks off to care for an ill child, spouse, parent or domestic partner. The program is ripe for abuse, and therefore unlikely to remain financially stable. It also imposes one more hardship on state businesses, at a time when they can least afford it.

Next is the state's new policy on greenhouse gases, which threatens to drive up the price of trucks and SUVs, and gets state regulators into what should be a federal issue.

Green motives also made for bad legislation in the form of a new state law requiring that 20 percent of all electricity sold in the state come from "renewable" energy sources by 2017. That sounds nice, but if energy producers aren't able to profitably increase output from renewable sources, they might just meet the quota by scaling back on total output altogether -- a dicey proposition for a state that, only two years ago, lacked the energy to keep its lights on.

Then there's the ugly -- state laws that aren't even well-intentioned, just a sop to special interests:

California ambulance chasers made out nicely in 2002, thanks to a law that extends the statute of limitations on personal-injury cases from one year to two, and reduces the amount of time employers have to prepare their defense in personal-injury lawsuits.

Unions also got a special gift from Sacramento in the form of increased workers' compensation benefits that are scheduled to nearly double by 2005. This, without any effort to reform the busted workers' compensation system, and at a time when California businesses are already struggling just to stay afloat.

And, this being California, there are also some new laws that are just plain silly:

Video arcades must now post signs informing their teenage customers that if they want to see a ratings guide for various games, one is available.

Nuclear terrorists be on alert: Criminals who use or threaten to use weapons of mass destruction in the Golden State must submit their DNA to a state database.

That ought to make us all breathe a little easier.

Now that the big stuff is out of the way, how about that budget?


TOPICS: Editorial; Government; Miscellaneous; US: California
KEYWORDS: calgov2002; california; laws; sillyliberals
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last
Terrorist Free! Attention Babs Streisand.
1 posted on 01/03/2003 12:41:54 PM PST by Mark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Mark
It is such a pretty state. The Sierra, the coast the beautiful buildings. After we get done liberating the people of Iraq maybe we should think about liberating the citizens of California. Talk about need for a regime change.
2 posted on 01/03/2003 1:59:49 PM PST by Blue Screen of Death
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mark
As far as I know, Santa Cruz is still "A Hate-Free Zone", thanks to legislation. It's against the law to hate--anything. Not only is it illegal to say, "I hate Bussels sprouts" or "I hate my mother-in-law or "I hate Nazis" or "Oh how I hate to get up in the morning," but it's against the law to hate such things and not say so--or to hate anything. It's the law!
3 posted on 01/03/2003 2:04:48 PM PST by Savage Beast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mark
Such a friendly place to run a business. Especially if you want people to show up. < /sarcasm>
4 posted on 01/03/2003 2:17:30 PM PST by hattend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mark
Nuclear terrorists be on alert: Criminals who use or threaten to use weapons of mass destruction in the Golden State must submit their DNA to a state database.

When will Grey Davis be demanding DNA samples from the leaders of China, who have threatened to nuke Kalifornia?

5 posted on 01/03/2003 2:20:53 PM PST by Phantom Lord
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mark
Forgot the new law requiring specific training for purchasing a handgun, which the buyer must "register". Next up: registration of current handgun owners. The legislation is already being considered for this session. Gov. Davis didn't sign it last year because of the election cycle. It's all but over for liberty in California.

Most free states to move to, anyone?

6 posted on 01/03/2003 2:58:39 PM PST by A Navy Vet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mark
You forgot the one about the NO SMOKING WITHIN 25 feet of a playground !
7 posted on 01/03/2003 3:11:43 PM PST by ATOMIC_PUNK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ATOMIC_PUNK
OOPS forgot the link

No-smoking zone to be increased under new laws

8 posted on 01/03/2003 3:15:52 PM PST by ATOMIC_PUNK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Mark
"Nuclear terrorists be on alert: Criminals who use or threaten to use weapons of mass destruction in the Golden State must submit their DNA to a state database."

Well that does it for me. I'm from the MidWest and my back yard is chock full of missile silos and ICBM's....and they are not registered with the ATF. Yup, and they are already preprogramed for the CA blue zones. Step on the wrong trip wire and whoosh KA-BOOM, NO MORE LIBERALS. sheesh !

9 posted on 01/03/2003 3:46:12 PM PST by SSN558
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SSN558
they are already preprogramed for the CA blue zones. Step on the wrong trip wire and whoosh KA-BOOM, NO MORE LIBERALS.

I live in CA--red, but near blue zone. But sometimes it is neccesary to call the rounds into your own position for the good of your own military/country. So, if it must be done, it must......

10 posted on 01/03/2003 4:02:23 PM PST by Mark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Mark; *calgov2002; snopercod; Grampa Dave; Carry_Okie; SierraWasp; Gophack; RonDog; ElkGroveDan; ...
Nice post!

calgov2002:

calgov2002: for old calgov2002 articles. 

calgov2002: for new calgov2002 articles. 

Other Bump Lists at: Free Republic Bump List Register



11 posted on 01/03/2003 4:58:17 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Blue Screen of Death
Thanks for the concern!
12 posted on 01/03/2003 4:59:57 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mark
So, all fellow Californians, what's your take on the outlook for real estate here this year? My landlord died in October. His widow and brother are fighting over the estate, including the house I rent. So I was thinking of buying a house (since interest rates are so low). But housing prices are through the roof. Do you all think they will go up, stay about the same, or will the bubble burst in '03. Any and all related advice is welcome.
13 posted on 01/03/2003 5:06:13 PM PST by Wolfstar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Savage Beast
As far as I know, Santa Cruz is still "A Hate-Free Zone", thanks to legislation. It's against the law to hate--anything. Not only is it illegal to say, "I hate Bussels sprouts"

Watch it buddy...if it weren't for Brussels Sprouts Santa Screws would have to give away pot on the City Hall steps. Oh, they do that now... ;-)

14 posted on 01/03/2003 5:09:23 PM PST by tubebender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: tubebender
Hey, did they ever chop down that obscene topiary?
15 posted on 01/03/2003 5:16:15 PM PST by Savage Beast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Wolfstar
So, all fellow Californians, what's your take on the outlook for real estate here this year?<

Not knowing what city you live in that is a tough question but the kid thinks the house is worth a Million while mom knows she paid $15,500 for the house back in 68. If you could get to mom you might be able to buy it for below market value and get her to carry the loan. I have done that a couple of times.

16 posted on 01/03/2003 5:17:38 PM PST by tubebender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: All
Kalifornia, land of the sleaze, home of the knave.

When the last American leaves Kalifornia, will you please bring the flag with you?
17 posted on 01/03/2003 5:19:44 PM PST by TaZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Mark
I saw some kids today outside the Post Office, roaring down the hill on skateboards. These were basic loser kids just having some relatively hazardous fun. Guaranteed, one of them will eventually crack his marginally useful brain in an accident with one of the older beer guzzling low lifes who frequent the local burrito joint next door. I explained to one of them that, as of the first of the year, their beneficent protector and friend of the children, the State of California, now legally requires them to wear helmets... or face fines of over $100 that their parents will have to pay. It's for their saaaafety.

One of the kids let out, "That sucks!"

Heheheheh
18 posted on 01/03/2003 5:20:03 PM PST by Carry_Okie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Savage Beast; Carry_Okie
Hey, did they ever chop down that obscene topiary?

I don't live there but my sister does. I never heard if the guy lost the appeal or not . Maybe CO can fill us in.

19 posted on 01/03/2003 5:21:40 PM PST by tubebender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Mark
Nuclear terrorists be on alert: Criminals who use or threaten to use weapons of mass destruction in the Golden State must submit their DNA to a state database.

That's right up there with, All suicide bombers are subject to prosecution.

20 posted on 01/03/2003 5:24:54 PM PST by Carry_Okie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson