Posted on 01/10/2003 3:08:30 PM PST by Dog Gone
Edited on 04/29/2004 2:01:54 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]
CARACAS, Venezuela (AP) --Opponents of President Hugo Chavez blamed the embattled leader for attacks on opposition-led marches but vowed to take to the streets again Friday.
"It's the leader of the country who is provoking this violence," said Carlos Ortega, president of the Confederation of Venezuelan Workers, the nation's largest trade union.
(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...
Officially, the army is staying neutral in the dispute, but Chavez surely recognizes the threat and has done everything he can to minimize it. It would be very optimistic to think that the entire army would turn against him.
But the timing has to be right. We would prefer for the Venezuelan political process to force Chavez from office without our fingerprints on it at all. At this point, I think we're still being patient.
Hundreds of Venezuelans stand in line to apply for a Spanish passport in Caracas January 10, 2003. A strike launched December 2, 2002 by opposition members of Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez has battered Venezuela's oil-reliant economy, rattled global energy markets and fired up the political conflict between opponents and supporters of the leftist leader to resign and call elections. REUTERS/Kimberly White REUTERS
Much of Chavez current restraint on not being more violent to bring this to an end, is his legitimate fear that that would have more of his military thus leaving him, too. Many within the ranks know if/when he uses them unconstitutionally, they have not only an excuse, but an obligation, not to follow his lead anymore.
As you know, the top Venezuela military officers that have voluntarily abandoned the Chavez regime over the last few months have banded together to publicly denounce his Cubanization of their beloved country. (They also have commitments from close to 22,000 more, still within Chavez ranks, awaiting a 'call to action' who, in the meantime, continue to feed intel out to their former commanding officers on the outside.)
They have been exposing the dirty secrets of his regime (at great risk personally) and have been the sparkplug that brought together all these different opposition groups under one unified tent. See their expose's here...
BTW, we could hope here in the USA for no better allies than the Venezuelan people. According to the just published 2002 Global Attitudes Survey by the Pew Research Center in Washington; 82% have a favorable opinion of the USA, and that is amongst the highest ratings of all the 44 countries surveyed. And, in regard to supporting the US led war on terrorism, 79% favor it while only 20% oppose it! (What's the current %'s for that question here in the USA today?!?)
-Shane
Would Chavez step down after an August referendum?
Can the strike succeed in forcing him out earlier?
Will there be a coup? Or will civil war break out?
My only fear is that the US will too eagerly embrace any short-term solution in Ven to assure some oil supply resumption and stability and not even examine & expose the Chavez regime material support for Saddam, Al Qaeda, Castro, Libya, N. Korea, China, Russia, drug trade and Columbian guerrillas, etc., etc.
The Chavez regime is a much greater threat to this hemisphere, security wise, than any short-term oil concerns. Of that, I'm convinced.
-Shane
But Washington is trying to line up the OAS to support the proposal as a diplomatic solution to the crisis. It's pretty clear that the US doesn't want a violent solution, if at all possible.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.