Did any of you see the Not in My Name founder make a fool of himself on H&C?

Fox News | 1/13/03 | Sparta

[Balata]

It ANGERS me how the Loony Left has controlled the message that those of us in the non-interventionist side believe, & how the major Media has kept our side of the story under wraps.

The major Media recruits Loonies, cause they know all they have to do is give them some mantras and other tripe they can memorize and then they don't have to worry about them. Besides that, the major Media isn't interested in a true dialogue on the issues.

[Just mythoughts]

Dick Morris should always be asked did you talk to Bill today? This guy is always trying to spread the Dems germs.

[It's me]

Yes! And Van Dam still doesn't get it! She says she did nothing wrong that night and that parents have nothing to learn form her. HA!

If she was home, sober and not high on pot, she may have heard Danielle's abductor come into the house. Damon, the dad, was high, too...

Oh, but she has no regrets!!! SICK!

[Stultis]

BTW this Joey creep sounded (to me) like he had a bit of a German accent. Was that just me?

[CARepubGal]

Brenda is a delusional idiot. Heer unwillingness to be a Mother not an egg doning slut was a factor in the horriffic death of her daughter.

[tinamina]

I kept wondering what that accent was, couldn't place it.

[bushfamfan]

Who was it? Mike Farrell? Either way, you can see people like Sean Penn when he was on Larry King, not taking calls and Michael Moore with his repeated rhetoric shield themselves from the other view because they know they have no intelligence when it comes to facts and what they believe. And the Demonrats are protected by the liberal media networks when they face Republicans. He wasn't going to get away with his anti-war rhetoric on Hannity and Colmes so he refused to answer logical questions from the other side. They are such obvious failures and cowards.

[geege]

Yes we watched it last night and it prompted us to go to bed because the idiot wasn't answering the question's and Sean should have just cut him off......he was very annoying....

[Stultis]

like Sean Penn when he was on Larry King, not taking calls

Yikes! Spicoli and the really dumb guy only had each other to talk to? That must have been painful to watch. Glad I missed it.

I used to listen to King on the radio many years ago. He was actually a fairly good story teller, but his interviews always sucked. I never understood how he gained a reputation as a interviewer. His questions were dull, unimaginative, uniformed, and seldom probed (and seemed almost at times to purposefully avoid) the more fundamental or interesting points of his guests theses.

Finally, and this may have been as long ago as the late 70's, I heard him explain on the radio that he never read the books his guests had written, unless by chance. He said this made him a better interviewer because he would ask the kinds of questions his audience (most of whom presumably had also not read the book) would have on their minds.

In spite of this being quite late at night, I screamed at the radio, "you are the stupidist S.O.B. anybody ever entrusted with a microphone." My mother, who was also listening, heard me from downstairs and yelled back, "Yes!" At that moment I turned off the radio and have never once willingly watched or listened to Larry King since.

[ottersnot]

While I do support the war against Saddam and the Axis of Evil, I do see the concerns of Ron Paul and the other more rational opponents about the future precedence of premption. While I disagree with the Honorable Mr. Paul on this issue, he at least makes some rational points when he opposes the war unlike this jackass and his Hollyweird/socialist lackeys and Harry Browne.
Well spoken Sparta, but a very sound argument can also be made that any military action in Iraq or against other state sponsors of Terrorism is NOT premption. The term premption would suggest that we have evidence that Terrorist activity (perhaps state sponsored) might be likely against the United States. It is clear that Terrorist activity has happened on many occaisons against this Country.
The issue here is being purposefully blurred by those who oppose any type of action to defend this country (or others) from further Terrorism attacks. Clearly if a State is supporting Terror attacks then that State must be dissuaded from this activity. Of course Diplomacy is the preferred method from dissuading a "rogue" state from supporting Terror, but a Rogue state by "definition" is unlikely to respond to anything but force. Force might come in the form of sanctions, pressure from the world community, or punishment for their proven actions.
Don't expect proof of Saddams participation in Terrorist activity to be immediately provided. The nature of intelligence gathering does not allow access by the public to gathered intelligence. The intelligence failures leading up to 911 highlight the necessity to protect sources. If you don't protect your sources, your not gonna have any sources.
So working on the presumption that Iraq could or does have a history of supporting Terror, and Iraq has WMD's that could easily be adapted to Terror what would you do to protect yourself?. Is this premption if you are simply protecting yourself from past attacks?. No, in my opinion this is learning a lesson and applying this lesson to protecting the world from Terrorism, not premption.

[Bella_Bru]

Sorry, I missed your ping! Nah....if it was Raimondo, he'd
have also added that Fox is clearly controlled by Israel. He is just that insane!

[merry10]

I think its time to leave the mom alone. She might be out there etc, and could have been a swinger, but who cares. Westerfield was preying on that entire neighborhood. Thank god that scum is off the street.

[dsutah]

People like this guy on H&C, need to be reminded that it took a 'war' to give him the right to rant and rave against another one!