Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Vast Right Wing and Mel Gibson
The American-Partisan ^ | 01/17/03 | Linda A. Prussen-Razzano

Posted on 01/17/2003 5:19:01 AM PST by Clintons-B-Gone

Have you ever suffered from acute political apathy?

I’m in the grips of it right now, an experience altogether unfamiliar for someone who has spent many years and earned a modicum of infamy exposing the foibles of various politicians. In retrospect, it began after the traumatic, premature birth of my second child, the insane weeks that followed, and a postpartum hormonal roller-coaster that left me feeling like a ghost walking through my own life. Despite the frenzy of political activity and the surging American response to September 11, 2001, I found myself so physically and emotionally drained that I could not follow events to my satisfaction. Unwilling to walk the path that so many in the mainstream media do – penning columns with little research and fewer facts – I drew back from politics slowly, steadily, and, almost completely.

Yes, apathy. The bane of an informed electorate. The primary reason why evil men rule, because good men are too darn tired to care and let them. A weariness so resounding that I can’t even muster the anger to slap Tom Daschle for his blatant lies and outrageous, daily antics. How do I know he’s lying? He opens his mouth. The same can be said for Saddam Hussein, North Korea, the Communist Chinese, and a whole host of others. What more needs to be said on the matter?

So what occurred to shake me from my relatively unhappy, willfully uninformed stupor? Darrell Ankarlo, a morning talk-show host for KLIF, played a snippet of Bill O’Reilly’s interview with Mel Gibson. Apparently, Mr. Gibson is currently making a movie about the life of Jesus Christ, a dry, reverent, brutal, yet accurate depiction of scripture. According to Mr. Gibson, bloodhounds in Hollywood, upset by the very politically incorrect nature of the material, have delved into his past, dug through his trash, and pestered his elderly father, looking for anything inflammatory to discredit him and the project.

This type of skullduggery is obscenely hypocritical. False stalwarts of free speech excoriated the Catholic Church when it objected to "The Last Temptation of Christ." The Church objected to the depiction of Christ as a confused and shiftless soul and was extremely offended by the sex scene with Mary. So what that their Lord and Savior was having a little dirt thrown on His face? The Media Elite painted the Catholic Church as an intolerant, archaic monster that couldn’t withstand any scrutiny and the movie quickly went to video.

But for all the hue and cry against the film, the Catholic Church did not launch a full-scale assault on Willem Dafoe or his family. And now that a version of Scripture is being made the Church might actually approve of, it must be cut down before the first curtain rises. If the Church approves and the Media Elite doesn’t, I know it’s going to be worth watching.

Having come to this conclusion, I realized that I wasn’t so apathetic, after all. I had made a decision, several years ago, to reject those actors who used their fame to spout anti-American, anti-Conservative propaganda. While I supported their right to voice their opinions, I didn’t have to support them with my money. After visiting several popular conservative information and chat sites, I realized I wasn’t alone. Others had come to the same conclusion and kept running lists of who would benefit from their hard-earned dollars, their trips to the movies now an annual event, if that.

The same could be said for television. When too many shows started spewing stories that read like a liberal’s fantasy, I switched channels, never to return. I couldn’t tell you what’s on CBS, NBC, or ABC anymore and, quite frankly, I don’t care. I discovered there are a great many people who also arrived at the same conclusion. If it’s not on FOX Cable, the History Channel, or a scarce few others, it doesn’t matter.

The same could also be said for music. Despite my head-banging, boot stomping, slam-dancing youth, I refused to waste my money on music pumped out by illiterate, smarmy snots who can’t play more than three cords yet chant about forgiving third world debt. Again, I was not alone.

The same could be said for advertisers. After Rosie O’Donnell shot her mouth off, announcing to the world that I, as a gun-owner, deserved to die, but her children were allowed to be protected by an armed guard, I walked away from K-Mart and never looked back. A pity, really, considering I usually spent several hundred dollars annually on holiday decorations and inexpensive, comfy clothes. If you ask any involved gun owner, and they will probably tell you the same thing.

Last, but certainly not least, was reading material. I tossed out of our house, and out of our lives, any magazines, newspapers, or periodicals promoting an agenda contrary to my Christian beliefs and Conservative positions. Pro-abortion, anti-gun, cheap sex, you name it…out it went, to the trash heap where it belonged. I doubt that I am alone in this regard.

Is there a Vast Right Wing Conspiracy? Yes, in a fashion. Quietly, but with increasing frequency, Conservatives are making the conscious choice to no longer fund the opposition. Ticket prices are up, but ticket sales are down. The Big Three are facing steady viewing declines, while cable is on the rise. Conservative talk-radio is bursting in every city, while music stations are resorting to disgusting pranks to keep listeners. Rosie O is on her way out of the popular culture and K-Mart just announced that it’s closing another 300 stores. Most newspapers are so desperate for readers, they’ll give you the paper free for six weeks, just to keep the printing presses busy.

Mel Gibson has never announced his political leanings, never threw a public hissy fit like Babs, or Alec, or Julia, or Ben, never done anything more than try to live his life according to the will of his Savior. So go ahead, vilify Mel Gibson for being an honest, decent man, who decided to make a movie about Jesus that he reportedly felt compelled to do. It could be the biggest stink bomb in history, panned by every reviewer on the map, and it will still do well. In my immediate family, there are at least 10 people who openly avoid the theaters – but they are anxious to see it.

If the Vast Right Wing mobilizes, it will be a box-office buster.

© 2003 Linda Prussen-Razzano


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: foxnews; melgibson
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-110 next last
To: alnick
Other than being frustrated by the darkly lit scenes (I want to SEE what's going on), I really enjoyed the movie.

Your frustration with the darkness was part of the point. Shayamalan got to you, as he intended to do. The darkness is frustrating and disorienting, much like his camera's tendency to linger on something, ANYTHING other than what you desperately want to see!

I thought it was a very well-made movie.

21 posted on 01/17/2003 6:29:06 AM PST by Oberon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: yendu bwam
...It's now MEL GIBSON vs. HILLARY RODHAM...
22 posted on 01/17/2003 6:34:18 AM PST by ALOHA RONNIE ( ..Vet-Battle of IA DRANG-1965 www.LzXRay.com ..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ZULU
There was another thread with stills from the movie. It will be very graphic and I think it needs to be so that we can all understand Christ's suffering. That being said, the pictures gave me second thoughts about taking my two boys. They have seen blood and gore in movies but I believe this will be a very emotional experience for many viewers (I hope so anyway). I'll take my oldest son but probably get the video for home viewing.

I wonder what kind of rating it will get if it's very brutal?
23 posted on 01/17/2003 6:36:05 AM PST by gingerky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Oberon
Your frustration with the darkness was part of the point.

I know, but a movie has to be very good to hold on to me in spite of frustrating me like that. This one did.

I also didn't miss the symbolism of the last scenes being brightly lit. :=)

24 posted on 01/17/2003 6:38:29 AM PST by alnick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Clintons-B-Gone
Preach on, Linda! I am so totally with you. When I signed up for something, I got cheap subscriptions to several magazines, including Time and Newsweek. I did not continue those rags. I don't watch West Wing, I certainly will not watch that new bomb with the Brolin guy, I even stopped watching Law and Order and the Practice for their constant hammering on liberal issues.

And you know what - I don't miss any of them. And I totally agree with the right of these people to spew their beliefs, and I have my right to spew my own and boycott their attempts at so-called journalism and entertainment.

25 posted on 01/17/2003 6:53:21 AM PST by gramho12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yendu bwam
Bump for the trash heap with that worthless garbage! And a salute to Mel Gibson, I do like his work. Glad to know he's one of us. Count ol' Norbert in with the VRWC!
26 posted on 01/17/2003 6:58:33 AM PST by angry beaver norbert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: gingerky
"I wonder what kind of rating it will get if it's very brutal? "

Crucifixtion, originally conceived somewhere in the Middle East, and typically refined by the Romans, as they did with everythng they adopted, to the hights of perfection, was VERY brutal and I can't imagine this getting anything but an X- rating.

Gibson seems to be fixated with having himself done away with in the most revolting manner in historical roles.
I am a history buff myself, but enjoy reading about politics, military operations, battles, weapons, etc. Methods of execution are not really something I enjoy reading about or viewing.
27 posted on 01/17/2003 7:14:19 AM PST by ZULU
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Clintons-B-Gone
I have every intention of seeing this movie! I would prefer a "Mel Gibson" movie with him in front of the camera as opposed to behind it...but I want this movie to be a HUGE success! I'm just curious to see what of "Hollywierd" will show up at the premier...
28 posted on 01/17/2003 7:15:42 AM PST by SAMS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RayChuang88
Wondering out loud here...
I've heard recently that more of our young people are voting republican. And now ABCBSNBC is losing veiwers to cable channels.
Are we conservatives really growing in numbers? I hope so.
29 posted on 01/17/2003 7:28:17 AM PST by sparkomatic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Clintons-B-Gone
While I agree with 90% of this column, I would argue that we cannot isolate ourselves with only conservative media. We need to read the liberal news papers, watch CBS, ABC, NBC, CNN, and MSNBC. If we don't then we will not have a complete view of what we are up against. Know your enemy. You cannot know them if you isolate your self. I was guilty of this when The Fox New Channel started up. I only watched them, and found my self not really caring what the other side was doing. It was my wife who pointed out the error of isolation.
30 posted on 01/17/2003 7:42:02 AM PST by sean327
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sean327
We need to read the liberal news papers, watch CBS, ABC, NBC, CNN, and MSNBC

We need to figure out a way to do this without contributing to them financially. Any ideas?

31 posted on 01/17/2003 7:51:55 AM PST by bankwalker (facts, opinions, beliefs...know the difference or pay the price)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Clintons-B-Gone
What no pictures of Mel???? How can this thread have gotten this far without at least one? (I'd post them, but I don't know how, yeah, lame, I know.) If this were an Ann Coulter thread the rabid guys would have posted at least a dozen pics by now.
32 posted on 01/17/2003 7:59:43 AM PST by Great_Dame
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bankwalker
We need to read the liberal news papers, watch CBS, ABC, NBC, CNN, and MSNBC

We need to figure out a way to do this without contributing to them financially. Any ideas?

Support your local library!

33 posted on 01/17/2003 8:00:03 AM PST by AzSteven
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Clintons-B-Gone
I have to wonder how many theater owners will simply not buy the film.
34 posted on 01/17/2003 8:00:40 AM PST by Straight Vermonter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintons-B-Gone
Go Linda! This is the best article I've read on F.R. in awhile. This is so right-on. And written by a woman, dontcha just love conservative women?
35 posted on 01/17/2003 8:22:48 AM PST by fish hawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintons-B-Gone
Mel Gibson in a Jesus flick...count me in!
36 posted on 01/17/2003 8:31:42 AM PST by ApesForEvolution ((communism is a rash that needs to be scraped off of the planet))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ZULU
Thanks for your post.
37 posted on 01/17/2003 8:38:00 AM PST by ApesForEvolution ((communism is a rash that needs to be scraped off of the planet))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: sean327
"While I agree with 90% of this column, I would argue that we cannot isolate ourselves with only conservative media. We need to read the liberal news papers, watch CBS, ABC, NBC, CNN, and MSNBC. If we don't then we will not have a complete view of what we are up against. Know your enemy. You cannot know them if you isolate your self. I was guilty of this when The Fox New Channel started up. I only watched them, and found my self not really caring what the other side was doing. It was my wife who pointed out the error of isolation."

Keep tuning into FR and you'll have no need to waste your time boosting their ratings.
38 posted on 01/17/2003 8:41:40 AM PST by ApesForEvolution ((communism is a rash that needs to be scraped off of the planet))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: sean327
we cannot isolate ourselves with only conservative media. We need to read the liberal news papers, watch CBS, ABC, NBC, CNN, and MSNBC. If we don't then we will not have a complete view of what we are up against.
Yes, but.

Advertising executives deliberately try to irritate you in order to cause you to remember their message; that is true of all of the PR field including journalism.

With all best intentions I still pick up at least a couple of news broadcasts a day, knowing that it isn't anywhere near Philipians 4:8 to do so. Rush's program doesn't start at noon Eastern time; it starts when the clock radio pops on at 12:06 PM.

I came to FR from a C-Span message board, where I debated liberals daily--and I had a reluctance to come to an explicitly conservative forum for exactly the reason you cited. But in fact the liberals never had anything new, and they became boring once you caught on to their limitations. FR does at least have anticonservative articles to gnaw on. The read-only nature of print/broadcast media surely does grate on a dedicated blog poster!!


39 posted on 01/17/2003 8:44:52 AM PST by conservatism_IS_compassion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: ALOHA RONNIE
An apocalyptic tale in which Mel Gibson, as Mad Max, takes on "The Bride of Satan".
40 posted on 01/17/2003 8:47:39 AM PST by sheik yerbouty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-110 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson