Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A.N.S.W.E.R. Director A Lawyer For Iraq?(My Title)
World Net Daily ^ | November 4, 2002 | Sherrie Gossett

Posted on 01/18/2003 10:18:48 PM PST by concerned about politics

Has anti-war movement been hijacked?
Terror alliances, radical politics revealed at forefront

While publicly promoting non-violent protest and humanitarian causes, some key leaders and prominent groups that organized and participated in the recent anti-war demonstrations at the U.S. Capitol and San Francisco are staunch supporters of terrorist groups and dictatorial regimes worldwide.

In fact, critics now charge that the "new" anti-war movement is being "hijacked" by this dominant network whose organizational power is increasing and whose political agenda is anathema to most Americans.

The Saturday, Oct. 26 rally, which focused on opposition to a U.S.-led war against Iraq and drew 100,000 protesters, featured speeches by the Rev. Jesse Jackson, the Rev. Al Sharpton, actress-activist Susan Sarandon, singer-songwriter Patti Smith, as well as a host of lesser-known figures. The protests also served as a platform for Democratic Party campaigning, as top politicos hobnobbed with the elite of the anti-war movement.

The large turnout signals an invigoration of the "new" anti-war movement, which has been increasingly dominated by the international A.N.S.W.E.R. coalition, an organizational front group formed by the International Action Center. Closely allied with IAC is the World Workers Party, a quasi-Stalinist organization that supports authoritarian regimes and communist dictatorships. The World Workers Party created the IAC in 1992, and put Ramsey Clark, now kingpin of the anti-war movement, at the head of it.

Also at the forefront in the weekend demonstration and current anti-war protests was the "Not In Our Name" campaign. NOIN spokesman Clark Kissinger represents that movement to the public and is an integral part of Refuse and Resist, an organization with close ties to the Revolutionary Communist Party USA, of which Kissinger is a member and writer for its newspaper.

The controversial ties of IAC remain almost completely unreported by the mainstream media, but increasingly are being exposed by a handful of enterprising journalists, including Michelle Goldberg of Salon.com, Ian Williams, United Nations correspondent for The Nation; Michael Tremoglie, Edward Immler and David Horowitz of FrontPage Magazine and Christopher Hitchens, a 20-year veteran of The Nation magazine, now writing independently.

The controversy has now spread to the commentary pages of Mother Jones and also has Justin Raimondo of Antiwar.com crying foul while bemoaning San Francisco's "Baghdad-by-the-Bay" protest experience.

"Pathetic" is how Raimondo described the protest, complaining that those in charge of the demonstration "weren't about to brook any criticism of either their ideology or their methods: this was the only show in town, and they weren't about to give it up."

Now, a small but growing number at both ends of the political spectrum, as well as libertarian activists and writers, are accusing the organization's elite of being sellouts to foreign dictators while giving lip service to humanitarian concerns. Some warn that this "patina of morality" obfuscates a surreptitious political agenda: the armed overthrow of the American republic.

More.....


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government
KEYWORDS: defendingsaddam; peacenicks; whoswho
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

1 posted on 01/18/2003 10:18:48 PM PST by concerned about politics
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: All
Keep Free Republic Rockin' 'Round The Clock!

Donate Here By Secure Server

Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794

or you can use

PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com

STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD

2 posted on 01/18/2003 10:20:28 PM PST by Support Free Republic (Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Support Free Republic
THE SEDITION ACT OF JULY 14, 1798
An Act in addition to the act, entitled "An act for the punishment of certain crimes against the United States."

SEC. I Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America, in Congress assembled, That if any persons shall unlawfully combine or conspire together, with intent to oppose any measure or measures of the government of the United States, which are or shall be directed by proper authority, or to impede the operation of any law of the United States, or to intimidate or prevent any person holding a place or office in or under the government of the United States, from undertaking, performing or executing his trust or duty; and if any person or persons, with intent as aforesaid, shall counsel, advise or attempt to procure any insurrection, riot. unlawful assembly, or combination, whether such conspiracy, threatening, counsel, advice, or attempt shall have the proposed effect or not, he or they shall be deemed guilty of a high misdemeanor, and on conviction, before any court of the United States having jurisdiction thereof, shall be punished by a fine not exceeding five thousand dollars, and by imprisonment during a term not less than six months nor exceeding five years; and further, at the discretion of the court may be holden to find sureties for his good behaviour in such sum, and for such time, as the said court may direct.

SEC. 2. And be it further enacted, That if any person shall write, print, utter or publish, or shall cause or procure to be written, printed, uttered or publishing, or shall knowingly and willingly assist or aid in writing, printing, uttering or publishing any false, scandalous and malicious writing or writings against the government of the United States, or either house of the Congress of the United States, or the President of the United States, with intent to defame the said government, or either house of the said Congress, or the said President, or to bring them, or either of them, into contempt or disrepute; or to excite against them, or either or any of them, the hatred of the good people of the United States, or to excite any unlawful combinations therein, for opposing or resisting any law of the United States, or any act of the President of the United States, done in pursuance of any such law, or of the powers in him vested by the constitution of the United States, or to resist, oppose, or defeat any such law or act, or to aid, encourage or abet any hostile designs of any foreign nation against the United States, their people or government, then such person, being thereof convicted before any court of the United States having jurisdiction thereof, shall be punished by a fine not exceeding two thousand dollars, and by imprisonment not exceeding two years.

SEC. 3. And be it further enacted, and declared, That if any person shall be prosecuted under this act, for the writing or publishing any libel aforesaid, it shall be lawful for the defendant, upon the trial of the cause, to give in evidence in his defence, the truth of the matter contained in the publication charged as a libel. And the jury who shall try the cause, shall have a right to determine the law and the fact, under the direction of the court, as in other cases.

SEC. 4. And be it further enacted, That this act shall continue and be in force until the third day of March, one thousand eight hundred and one, and no longer: Provided. That the expiration of the act shall not prevent or defeat a prosecution and punishment of any offence against the law, during the time it shall be in force.

JONATHAN DAYTON, Speaker of the House of Representatives.
THEODORE SEDGWICK, President of the Senate, pro tempore.
APPROVED, July 14, 1798:
JOHN ADAMS, President of the United States.

3 posted on 01/18/2003 10:36:53 PM PST by LuvUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: concerned about politics
I wouldn't be surprised to find out that Bill Clinton had a hand in organizing these protests.

It will be interesting to see if he comes up for air within the next few days to weigh in.

4 posted on 01/18/2003 10:37:12 PM PST by Texas Eagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: concerned about politics
A long but amazing article. Thanks so much for posting this.
5 posted on 01/18/2003 10:39:29 PM PST by nutmeg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lo-Pro
ping
6 posted on 01/18/2003 10:58:50 PM PST by Slyfox (Get your show prep here)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texas Eagle
Don't forget the mastermind, Hillary.
7 posted on 01/18/2003 10:59:56 PM PST by Slyfox (Get your show prep here)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: concerned about politics
Whatever sinister things you can dig up about AWNSWER are probably true they are a communist organization.
8 posted on 01/18/2003 11:01:54 PM PST by weikel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LuvUSA
Excellent article and WELL worth the read.
9 posted on 01/18/2003 11:16:50 PM PST by grimalkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: concerned about politics
Thanks for the post. Bump.
10 posted on 01/19/2003 7:56:52 AM PST by mewzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: weikel
Each and every one of these organizations are based at a single address:

39 W. 14 St., #206, NY, NY 10011

This is the headquarters of the World Workers Party (WWP), the International Action Center (IAC), A.N.S.W.E.R., Not In Our Name, etc.

As Gossett reports, the predecessor organization is the WWP, a Stalinist front. And Ramsey Clark is their man.

The "anti-war" movement is nothing more than an "anti-American" movement, directed by Communists. The celebrities who support them are too dense to realize it. And the mainstream media is too lazy to find out and report it.

11 posted on 01/19/2003 8:11:07 AM PST by okie01 (The Mainstream Media: IGNORANCE ON PARADE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: LuvUSA
And here is the relevant phrase.

Sec.3. "......... And the jury who shall try the cause, shall have a right to determine the law and the fact, under the direction of the court, as in other cases. "

12 posted on 01/19/2003 8:27:43 AM PST by tet68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: firebrand; StarFan; Dutchy; stanz; RaceBannon; Doctor Raoul; Neets; evilC; Black Agnes; Cacique; ...
ping!

A long article but well worth the read. Interesting background on A.N.S.W.E.R. and the current "anti-war" crowd.

Please Freepmail me if you want on or off my infrequent ping list.

13 posted on 01/19/2003 1:13:38 PM PST by nutmeg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mudboy Slim
I saw some of your posts on a related thread... thought you might be interested in this one.
14 posted on 01/19/2003 1:14:51 PM PST by nutmeg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: okie01; weikel; nutmeg
For more info on the anti-American ties to these organizations, see the following:

Who Funds the Anti-War Commies? (MINE)

15 posted on 01/19/2003 1:27:04 PM PST by dware (I sometimes have trouble finishing what I....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: concerned about politics
http://rwor.org/rcp-e.htm

http://www.internationalanswer.org/

http://www.iacenter.org/main.htm

http://www.notinourname.net/


Clark Kissinger has played a key role in the growing movement demanding a new trial for Pennsylvania Death Row inmate Mumia Abu-Jamal.

http://www.refuseandresist.org/altindex.html

16 posted on 01/19/2003 1:32:52 PM PST by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dware
Repeating your link -- to insure that anybody drawn to this thread visits the other thread, too.

Who Funds the Anti-war Commies

And ain't it amazin' how they're all headquartered at one address?

39 W. 14 St., #206, NY, NY 10011

And ain't it even more amazin' how the mainstream media, with all their resources, can't seem to undertake the revealing research you've undertaken? Or, if they've undertaken it, can't be bothered to report it?

17 posted on 01/19/2003 1:54:08 PM PST by okie01 (The Mainstream Media: IGNORANCE ON PARADE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: okie01
Isn't it amazing, though?

As I mentioned on my thread, I am going to file a Freedom of Information request Tuesday. I am just DYING to find out who their major contributors are!

18 posted on 01/19/2003 1:57:22 PM PST by dware (I sometimes have trouble finishing what I....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: dware
As I mentioned on my thread, I am going to file a Freedom of Information request Tuesday.

Take 'em down, dware. I'll be at a funeral Tues but let me know if I can help.

19 posted on 01/19/2003 2:02:42 PM PST by AppyPappy (If you can't beat 'em, beat 'em anyway)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: dware
If you need help, flag me.
20 posted on 01/19/2003 2:05:30 PM PST by Registered (Be a Star, donate to FR.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson