HILL'S HOMELAND ATTACK

NY Post ^ | January 25, 2003 | ROBERT HARDT Jr. and BRIAN BLOMQUIST

[metesky]

One hopes that W gives the stem-winder of a lifetime on Tuesday night, laying out the scam for all to see and, without naming names (statesman like), puts the screws to all who are holding us back from the ultimate victory over the IslamoNazis.

I think he's gonna do it and I'm almost giddy with anticipation.

[backhoe]

You need to keep this availiable and publish it every where and everytime you can

I do! Whenever it is relevant to something I see- please feel free to copy & save the html and spread those links as far as you wish.

[jwalsh07]

WTC 1, Khobar Towers, Mogadishu, US Embassies in Africa. USS Cole.

The list is endless. The Clintons should be in exile at the very least.

[SandRat]

So, Hill-de-Beast your calling the Bush administration "faded from the top." Oh be careful mouthy one of NY, lest you reawaken the memories of the nation. If you do, they'll remember that for eight long years under the first ever "co-presidency" of you and ahem, your husband the entire administration was jaded from the top. Fear loud beast; truly tremble in fear, one loud noise (I think there’s going to be one in late Feb) and the meal de jour for the whole lot of your party will be foot-in-mouth followed by a biggie-size of humble pie.

The short of it is that the Hill-de-Beast is a Jane Fondue wanna be and needs SHUT THE _______ UP!

[backhoe]

I hate everything this woman stands for!

You are not alone... you know, when the loathsome duo that is the Clintons weaseled their way to power, I bore no great dislike for them- I figured Bill would be "just another failed Governor who became President, like Jimmy Carter."

It really wasn't until about the second year of "The Golden Age of Clinton" that I became aware of their corrupt and downright criminal nature.

But they never could have pulled it off without the collusion of the media, press and entertainment both. They had a lot cheerleaders.

[freekitty]

She is just trying to get elected President. Look at all the anti war protests going on. Just like the 60's and you know where Hill was in the 60's. On every side; but America's. Also, remember the Demorats came into power and what a disaster that was. If we have learned anything, people like Hillary and Bill Clinton can only spell disaster for the United States.

[buffyt]

You are right, she is running for president.

[backhoe]

One hopes that W gives the stem-winder of a lifetime

I join you in that wish!

[tractorman]

I sense a huge trap is about to snap shut.
President Bush has now given every liberal the chance to take their best shot at him and they are now aligned together under the media spotlight. When the truth becomes evident, they will all stand exposed as the hypocritical fools that they are.

[Eric in the Ozarks]

I still believe sometime in the next 12 to 18 months, another awful story will slither out about the Clintons. Something more than the usual tale of dishonesty and deceit.
They burned too many people in their political careers and there are too many publishers all too willing to hand out advance money for a juicy yarn.

[squibs]

"Wonder if anyone listens to her ?"
You would think not but she got elected didn't she?
Every time this tramp opens her mouth slime oozes out.
There has to be a way to keep the facts of all the evil she
was/is involved in in front of the public.
Keep pounding away so no matter where someone looks for info
on her they find out she's a sleazball. If this were done
by G.W and the majority she'd soon have to shut up.

[Ben Hecks]

Thanks for the links; it's a good refresher for all of us and a great place for newbies to get up to speed. Interesting that there has been no media coverage of Hillary's buddy Mark Jimenez who is still sitting in jail in Florida after being extradited in December. Perhaps he has decided that it's safer in jail than on the street.

[backhoe]

Perhaps he has decided that it's safer in jail than on the street

No doubt... the Clintons sure have a lot of dead "friends," don't they?

[Bill Davis FR]

GO HILLY GO!!!!

[NY Cajun]

The following is the New York Post's editorial reply to the bitch:

MRS. CLINTON'S MYTH

January 25, 2003 -- Hillary Rodham Clinton yesterday delivered herself of a blistering attack on the Bush administration's nation al-security policy:
"Time has passed and our vigilance has faded," claimed New York's junior senator. "We have relied on a myth of homeland security - a myth written in rhetoric, inadequate resources and a new bureaucracy, instead of relying on good, old-fashioned American ingenuity, might and muscle."
Hmmm. What to make of that?
Well, not to visit the sins of the husband on the wife - okay, maybe a little bit - but let the record show that the first attack on the World Trade Center took place in 1993, two months into the Clinton co-presidency.
And, as Rep. Peter King (R-Long Island) noted yesterday, "[After the first attack], nobody from the Clinton administration, including the president himself, ever even came to New York to visit the site, and they did nothing from 1993 until they left office to protect New York."
The contrast with the current administration couldn't be more stark.
For the record also shows that the previous administration did little to respond to subsequent attacks on U.S. interests: the Khobar Towers marine barracks in Saudi Arabia in 1995, the two U.S. embassies in Africa in 1998, USS Cole in Yemen in 2000.
Again, contrast that with the current administration's response - both in Afghanistan and across the world in the broader war on terror.
Certainly looks like "old-fashioned American ingenuity, might and muscle" to us. But what about the "new bureaucracy" that Mrs. Clinton so scathingly condemns?
Well, first, it was the Democrats who got out in front and demanded the creation of a Department of Homeland Security - and then blocked it for months afterwards in a happily failed attempt to lard up that bureaucracy with union-protecting language.
Sen. Clinton has, as the saying goes, a right to her opinion. What she doesn't have is a right to her own set of facts.
And the fact is, the previous administration - in which she held a significant behind-the-scenes role, and from which her current position devolves - failed to respond forcefully enough when American interests were attacked, both at home and abroad.
The Democratic Party, as a whole, has scant standing to criticize the efforts of the current administration regarding national security.
Mrs. Clinton, individually, has none.

NY Post Editorial

[John Lenin]

This woman is a reincarnation of Cleopatra, I swear it's true. As we all know Cleopatra takes poison rather than let her enemies capture her.

[APBaer]

"If, G-d forbid, there is another 9/11, she can say "See, I warned you."
That's what this is all about."

Absolutely.
This is a very safe move on her part.
The odds that there will be some terrorist act somewhere in the US in the next several years are much over 50 percent.

[DaBroasta]

"It's like inviting the enemy to try another attack."

The yellowdog partisans of the RAT cult would love nothing more. They are so bent on regaining power that they hope and would gladly trade thousands of dead Americans for control of the government. Life (except for their own of course) is of no value to them.

[ohiobushman]

The SKANK say's President Bush hasn't done enough since Sept 11th? Well B**ch,there hasn't been anymore attacks has there? If your low-life husband had done he's job(not blow job) there might not have been an attack!

[mia]

One also wonders if her ChiCom handlers have told her there will be another attack soon and it's time for her to get on the record and out in front. I find this speech terrifying because I feel like she may know a lot more than she is saying. Clinton connections with evil run deep.

It should always be kept in the forefront of everyone's mind that the Clinton's not only react to a crisis to suit themselves, but also create a crisis for their own political gain.

The Clinton's and their minions are evil.