Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Man sets long-forgotten WWII story straight
AP ^ | 1/25/03 | HELEN O’NEILL

Posted on 01/27/2003 7:54:54 AM PST by Gothmog

BROCKTON, Mass. – Paul Lawton’s quest to rewrite history began in a Brockton bar on a cold March night in 1998.

Warmed by Budweisers and shots of Yukon Jack, he listened as his lifelong friends, two brothers, told the tale of a U.S. warship blown to pieces just south of Portland, Me., late in World War II, and of their father, a 32-year-old seaman who perished in the blast.

Vividly the brothers, Bob and Paul Westerlund, recalled the sadness of the time. And they remembered the Navy explanation: A boiler explosion had split the 200-foot submarine chaser, the USS Eagle PE 56, in two.

A terrible accident, the Navy said, all the more tragic because it happened just two weeks before Germany surrendered.

But their mother never believed the official version. And so she told her children what survivors told her – that moments after the explosion, as they were diving into the frigid water, they glimpsed something dark and sinister. It rose to the surface for an instant, but they would never forget the sight – a submarine conning tower painted with a mischievous red horse trotting on a yellow shield.

Lawton, a lawyer and military historian, is obsessed by submarines. As a child he spent hours drawing intricate replicas of U-boats and battleships. He has taught courses in U-boat history. He can recite every detail of every battle and loss in the Atlantic.

But he had never heard this story before.

Lawton knew the trotting horse was the insignia of a German U-boat, the U-853, which the records said had sunk just one ship in New England waters – a coal tanker called the Black Point. But the brothers insisted that the U-853 also sank the USS Eagle.

Lawton’s head was reeling. Forty-nine men died in the Eagle disaster. If they had died in enemy action, they were entitled to Purple Hearts. They were entitled to more than being simply written off as victims of a freak accident.

Back at his apartment, Lawton pulled out his U-boat “bible,” a two-inch thick book by German historian Jurgen Rohwer. A footnote contained a reference to the USS Eagle and to its probable sinking by the U-853.

“I just couldn’t believe it,” Lawton said. “Why would the Navy say it was a boiler explosion?”

Lawton started digging through the archives, calling military historians, writing letters to various branches of the Navy. He requested the report from the court of inquiry into the sinking, witness statements, deck logs.

Sorry, the replies said; the files were missing, presumed lost.

Lawton requested the records of other ships operating in the area at the time, including the USS Selfridge, a destroyer which had rescued 13 men from the sinking Eagle. Buried in the military jargon of its deck logs he found references to sonar detections, and to a hunter-killer task force of destroyers and bombers assembled to track down a sub immediately after the sinking.

Inspired by Lawton, the Westerlunds placed a small notice in The Boston Globe, saying they were looking for survivors of the USS Eagle.

Two people contacted them immediately. John Breeze, a former naval engineer and USS Eagle survivor vividly recalled the sinking, the rescue, the dark silhouette of the submarine. Alice Hultgren, a former WAVE remembered taking notes at the hastily convened court of inquiry at naval dispensary where the survivors were treated.

Both were shocked when Lawton told him the official Navy explanation.

“Boiler explosion!” Breeze exclaimed over the phone. “We all knew it was a sub. How could the Navy deny it?”

“The fellows all said there had been a sub,” Hultgren said.

Their testimony filled 18 pages. Still, Lawton’s letters to the Navy continued to be dismissed.

“The cause of the sinking has been determined to be the result of a boiler explosion,” was the reply he received, over and over.

Lawton felt hopeless.

And then one morning in October 1999, a package arrived, a 76-page document dated June 1, 1945. The Court of Inquiry report, the formal record that the Navy insisted was missing.

Lawton would never know for sure who sent it. He didn’t need to.

In page after page, survivors stated they had seen a sub.

To Lawton, it was clear. Top Naval officials knew the Eagle had been sunk by a German submarine. They just couldn’t bring themselves to publicly admit it.

Lawton was elated. Surely now the Navy would listen to him.

But nothing changed.

Lawton’s father, a retired judge and former state representative, became so incensed at the way his son was being ignored that he called his old friend, Congressman Joseph Moakley.

Just read the research, he asked. See what you can do.

In late fall 2000 Moakley petitioned the Navy to reopen the Eagle investigation. Though the Navy didn’t agree to Moakley’s request, it did forward Lawton’s research to the Naval Historical Center.

There, it landed on the desk of Bernard Cavalcante, an archivist who had spent 10 years working German historian Jurgen Rohwer piecing together a detailed list of all military activity on the Eastern Seaboard.

The USS Eagle was on that list, along with its sinking by the U-853.

Cavalcante read Lawton’s work in shock, marveling at the research, appalled by the Navy’s response. Whatever the justification in wartime, Cavalcante thought, it was time to set the record straight.

“Cal made me believe that we could rewrite history,” Lawton said.

For the next few months, that is what they tried to do. Cavalcante dug up personal notes from his research with Rohwer as well as declassified war records that Lawton hadn’t been able to find – records that documented the U-853 operating off the coast of Maine at the time the Eagle went down.

Lawton tracked down two more Eagle survivors, Harold Petersen of Rochester, N.Y., and John Scagnelli of Morris Plains, N.J. Like Breeze, both remembered being torpedoed by a sub.

In May 2001, Cavalcante sent a letter to Navy Secretary Gordon England, enclosing a synopsis of Lawton’s research and documents backing up the case. And he enclosed a rare recommendation – that the historical record be changed to state that the USS Eagle was sunk as a result of enemy action.

The ceremony was simple and solemn, tinged with sadness and with triumph. Aboard a naval museum ship in Quincy on a steamy day last June, the families of the men of the Eagle gathered for a final tribute.

The top navy brass was there, sitting next to widows and sisters and brothers of the men who had died. The Westerlund brothers were there, along with their mother, Phyllis, 87, nervous and full of memories, especially when she met the three survivors – the last men to have seen her husband alive.

One by one, the names of the dead were read aloud as family members stepped forward and accepted Purple Hearts.

And when the ceremony was over and the speeches were done, three old men wearing USS EAGLE caps approached Lawton.

Tears in their eyes, they handed him a plaque, cherrywood with a gold trim. It was engraved with a picture of a warship exploding and included a brief description of the “forgotten disaster” and one man’s quest to set the record straight.

It ended with the words, “We thank you from the bottom of our hearts.”


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; US: Maine; US: Massachusetts; US: New Hampshire
KEYWORDS: forgottenheroes; navybureaucracy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

1 posted on 01/27/2003 7:54:54 AM PST by Gothmog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SAMWolf
An article you might enjoy
2 posted on 01/27/2003 7:57:55 AM PST by Gothmog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gothmog
Thank you.
3 posted on 01/27/2003 8:02:47 AM PST by SwinneySwitch (Pass the Ban!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gothmog
"Warmed by Budweisers and shots of Yukon Jack . . ."
Boilermakers. Somehow fitting in a way.
4 posted on 01/27/2003 8:02:50 AM PST by BenLurkin (Socialism is immoral.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gothmog; souris; AntiJen; Victoria Delsoul; MistyCA; SpookBrat; SassyMom; bentfeather; GatorGirl; ..
Thanks Gothmog.

It's about time these men received the credit they were due.
5 posted on 01/27/2003 8:07:23 AM PST by SAMWolf (To look into the eyes of the wolf is to see your soul)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Gothmog
Our military history is full of these hard to believe stories...why would the Navy continue their denial decades later ?
6 posted on 01/27/2003 8:13:57 AM PST by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Vic3O3; cavtrooper21
Ping
7 posted on 01/27/2003 8:17:37 AM PST by dd5339 (Homeschooling is eductation, not indoctrination!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Gothmog
Thanks for posting this. A slightly different version of the story is here
8 posted on 01/27/2003 8:17:43 AM PST by csvset
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks
I have no idea, just bureaucracy I guess.
9 posted on 01/27/2003 8:21:06 AM PST by Gothmog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Gothmog
How wonderful! It shows that perseverance works.
10 posted on 01/27/2003 8:22:20 AM PST by tiki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gothmog
Thanks for posting this, Gothmog. If only our Leaders had an ounce of the integrity found in the soldiers that fought and died for our Republic.
God bless our Vets and may He bring His sword of Judgement to bear on all who desecrate the integrity of the United States.
11 posted on 01/27/2003 8:26:20 AM PST by Marobe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #12 Removed by Moderator

To: Gothmog
A LITTLE off-topic.....The picture of the soldier kissing the woman in Times Square was a LIE!! The man wrote to Ann Landers about it....does anyone have the info??
13 posted on 01/27/2003 8:32:51 AM PST by Ann Archy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks
why would the Navy continue their denial decades later

Bureaucracies don't like to admit they're wrong. Once a finding is committed to paper, changing it means admitting that the original findings were incorrect. From the point of view of the people making and maintaining the records, making changes like this "looks bad" because it forces them to admit that they're records contain errors, and therefore throws a taint on the validity of the rest of their findings.

This is just the way bureaucrats think...they're not like normal people.
14 posted on 01/27/2003 8:38:24 AM PST by Arthalion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks
"Our military history is full of these hard to believe stories...why would the Navy continue their denial decades later ?"

Apparently there is a well-entrenched tradition of suppressing unpleasant information. Two other examples:

http://www.militarycorruption.com/mullahy.htm

http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/RANCHO/CRASH/TWA/IOWA.html
15 posted on 01/27/2003 8:40:10 AM PST by Blue_Ridge_Mtn_Geek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Arthalion
You're probably right. Bureaucracies think alike, whether they're US Navy or any other branch of government.
My dad flew C-46's for the Army Air Force in the China-Burma-India Campaign, was involved in a crash landing and was treated for burns. But because he was a civilian volunteer, he never got Veterans status or benefits, while hundreds of Royal Lao soldiers (from the Viet Nam era) living in the US in the 1980's were granted benefits equal to our own.
16 posted on 01/27/2003 8:46:06 AM PST by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: SAMWolf
Amen to that!
17 posted on 01/27/2003 8:51:36 AM PST by Soaring Feather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Blue_Ridge_Mtn_Geek
I am familiar with the Iowa story.
BTW, the Iowa is now parked in Suison Bay, northeast of San Francisco. Someone said the Navy had made cometic repairs to the turret but since Iowa was in more or less permanent storage, full repairs were not contemplated.
18 posted on 01/27/2003 8:54:03 AM PST by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Gothmog
thanks for posting this, I read it yesterday in the paper
19 posted on 01/27/2003 9:03:01 AM PST by apackof2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NFifty15
I think that was the Eldridge.
20 posted on 01/27/2003 10:06:31 AM PST by tiki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson