Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CA - How to Solve the Budget Crisis in Three Easy Steps
Senator McClintock ^ | January 29, 2003 | Tom McClintock

Posted on 01/29/2003 10:42:38 AM PST by concentric circles

California’s budget crisis is not complicated and it is not intractable and it is not mysterious. Over the last four years, population and inflation have grown at a combined rate of 21 percent. Revenue has grown 28 percent. Spending has grown 36 percent.

Our distress is not for lack of revenue but for lack of discipline. And to restore that discipline, three simple acts are all that is needed to put California’s financial crisis behind us.

First, the immediate budget shortfall requires policy makers to abide by the first law of holes: when you’re in one, stop digging.

Most of California’s deficit is not the difference between what it is currently spending and what it is currently taking in. It is rather caused by the projected increases in state spending over the next 18 months. Most of the deficit is not a matter of cutting current spending – but rather arresting the growth in future spending.

That growth is driven by a variety of constitutional and statutory mandates. But virtually all of them can be suspended by the legislature at any time by the same vote that it takes to enact the budget. The principal exception is service on the debt.

Thus, merely suspending these mandates and reducing current expenditures by 9.5 percent – and then holding at that level for 18 months – would eliminate the deficit without the tax increases, raids on local government and pilfering of pension and special funds that the Governor has proposed.

Could your family cut its spending by 9.5 percent in hard times? In this recession, many families are doing exactly that. Their state government, which is now spending a larger portion of their earnings than at any time in our history, could profit from their example.

Secondly, the discomfort of frugality could be eased dramatically if accompanied by a comprehensive review of every state agency and program now on the books. California State government spends roughly twice per person what Arizona spends, and yet Arizona delivers a vastly higher level of service in every category including academic performance, electricity generation, water delivery, and highway and housing construction.

The difficulty in conducting such a review – and acting upon it – is that every program has a highly motivated constituency that jealously and expertly guards its budget. Faced with the long overdue need to close obsolete military bases, the federal government confronted the same paralysis caused by interest group pressure. Ultimately, Congress broke the gridlock when it took the task of reviewing bases out of the political arena and gave it to an independent panel of management experts that returned a comprehensive recommendation for a single up-or-down vote.

This mechanism prevented the political logrolling, mutual back-scratching and parochial grandstanding that had long blocked the consolidation and closure of obsolete bases. The same thing desperately needs to be done with California’s bureaucracies.

Finally, with the state’s fiscal affairs back in order, a constitutional spending limit must be restored. California had such a provision from 1979 to 1990, commonly called the Gann Spending Limit, restraining the growth of state expenditures to the combined growth of population and inflation. State spending still more than doubled during this period, but only as fast as the economy could sustain it. In 1990, the limit was blown into the stratosphere by Proposition 111.

If the Gann Limit had been restored at the outset of the Davis Administration, California’s current budget would still be 21 percent larger than it was four years ago. But instead of a $35 billion deficit, California would enjoy a $5 billion surplus this year – and $30 billion cumulatively over the last four.

These three simple acts would solve California’s current budget crisis and prevent future recurrences. Will they be enacted?

Probably not. And that’s the only reason why California’s budget problem is intractable. It is not answers but action that is missing.


TOPICS: Activism/Chapters; Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Editorial; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: budget; calgov2002; california; spending; taxes; tommcclintock
California news outlets will not be pushing this plan.
1 posted on 01/29/2003 10:42:38 AM PST by concentric circles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: concentric circles
Senator McClintock BUMP
2 posted on 01/29/2003 10:45:52 AM PST by hedgetrimmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: concentric circles
This is a classic metaphor:

"First, the immediate budget shortfall requires policy makers to abide by the first law of holes: when you’re in one, stop digging."

Someone better take away Grey Davis's shovel first...ROFL

3 posted on 01/29/2003 10:46:11 AM PST by Rain-maker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Davi$ Depression Bump

The Battle rages on..

4 posted on 01/29/2003 11:01:28 AM PST by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: concentric circles
Could your family cut its spending by 9.5 percent in hard times? In this recession, many families are doing exactly that. Their state government, which is now spending a larger portion of their earnings than at any time in our history, could profit from their example.

Well said Tom.

5 posted on 01/29/2003 11:01:45 AM PST by Flashman_at_the_charge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: concentric circles
A one-year moratorium on public schools would do the trick. Let the teachers and administrators get some experience working in other areas. Send the kids home and close the grubby little concentration day camps. Future savings would accrue when millions of parents realize they are capable of educating their own children whereas the state is incapable of providing a true education.
6 posted on 01/29/2003 11:03:21 AM PST by Homer_J_Simpson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: concentric circles
This article needs to be forwarded to everyone in California, including these bastards, http://democrats.assembly.ca.gov/members/
who got us here in the first place!
7 posted on 01/29/2003 11:26:16 AM PST by Weimdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Weimdog
My brother and I both moved down to the U.S. a few years ago from Canada. We're both professionals who wanted to flee the socialism and inept government that is ruining Canada in exchange for the greener pastures of an economic system that rewards hard work and financial responsiblity. He moved to L.A. in the late 1990s. I moved to Phoenix in 2000. He wanted me to move to L.A. as well, but I told him that California suffered from every major problem that I was fleeing from in Canada.

We live in similar sized houses in similar quality neighborhoods. My house cost less than 1/2 what his house cost. My combined federal and state income taxes are more than 1/3 less than what I was paying in Canada. The state and local sales taxes that I'm subject to are about 1/2 what I was paying in Canada. My brother told me the other day that once the latest California income tax increase comes into effect, his gross tax rate will actually be HIGHER than what he was paying in Canada.

Guess who picked the right state to live in?
8 posted on 01/29/2003 11:39:38 AM PST by Camerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Camerican
As I see it just give them time & all of these governments will be as high as Canada.
9 posted on 01/29/2003 11:47:00 AM PST by Digger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: concentric circles; *calgov2002; snopercod; Grampa Dave; Carry_Okie; SierraWasp; Gophack; RonDog; ..
Thanks for posting this!

calgov2002:

calgov2002: for old calgov2002 articles. 

calgov2002: for new calgov2002 articles. 

Other Bump Lists at: Free Republic Bump List Register



10 posted on 01/29/2003 12:21:45 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach (Impeach Davis!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
This is not rocket science...if a family's income is less than the expenses what do we all do? Fortunately I will be observing the Sacramento cartoon unfold from NV...
11 posted on 01/29/2003 12:35:33 PM PST by kellynla (House hunting in NV...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: concentric circles
Great article! BUMP!
12 posted on 01/29/2003 1:25:55 PM PST by Gophack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: concentric circles
1. Suspension of mandated increases in spending accompanied by a 9.5% reduction of current spending for a period of 18 months.

2. An independent review of all state spending and programs with all reductions voted on in a single up or down vote.

3. A constitutional spending limit.

And NO NEW TAXES, FEES, OR LEVYS NEEDED!
13 posted on 01/29/2003 2:08:33 PM PST by concentric circles (The liberty we prize is not America's gift to the world, it is God's gift to humanity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gophack
If Davis lost a successful recall election, I would REALLY like to See McClintock run.
14 posted on 01/29/2003 2:17:01 PM PST by Carry_Okie (Because there are people in power who are truly evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie
I sure wish that Sen McClintock ran for governor instead of controller. That idiot Simon lost to a highly unpopular governor, and in the process likely cost McClintock the controllership as well.
15 posted on 01/29/2003 3:24:01 PM PST by CdMGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: concentric circles
"What budget problem. There's no budget problem.
All you have to do is raise taxes. Nothing to it.
Simple. Sheesh."
- Simple Jombroni(D)
16 posted on 01/29/2003 4:09:10 PM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard
"What budget problem. There's no budget problem. All you have to do is raise taxes. Nothing to it. Simple. Sheesh."

And in the meantime, the business complex where my office is located is about 80% empty with new moving vans showing up every day since December 1.

And yes, we're quitting California too. Way too expensive. The operation can be run remotely from Phoenix.

Thank you Gray Davis.

17 posted on 01/29/2003 8:54:09 PM PST by Euro-American Scum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson