Skip to comments.THE TRUE MOTIVATION BEHIND DEMOCRATS
Posted on 01/30/2003 5:56:36 AM PST by conservativecorner
Ive gone through this routine on the air a few times, but I didnt remember whether or not it had been made a part of the Nuze.
Right now we have leading Democrats opposing George Bush on both his efforts at cutting taxes and his determination to rid the world of the threat posed by Saddam Hussein. I am here to propose to you that the Democrats oppose both of these initiatives because they know full well that both of them are correct!
Democrats are out of power. The Republicans have control of the House, the Senate and the White House. Democrats feel deep in their hearts that this current situation is a violation of the laws of nature. Democrats feel that they have a divine right to rule and that the future of human civilization on Earth is in danger until things are right in Washington again. By right, they mean Democrats in control.
Democrats realize that there are two situations that may drive voters to drive Republicans, including President Bush, out of office in 2004. One would be the continuation of our poor economy, the other would be a perceived failure in the war against terrorism.
Democrats can read history. They know that there have been three significant tax cuts in our not-too-distant economic history: one under Coolidge, another under Kennedy and one under Reagan. In each instance the tax cut led to strong economic growth which, in turn, led to a strong increase (not a decrease) in federal tax revenues. Democrats are concerned, with good reason, that this may happen yet again if Bushs tax cut plan becomes law. A strong and growing economy spells disaster to Democrats in 2004. This is why they will fight Bushs tax cut plans. They will fight them because they know they will work, and they are perfectly willing to extend the economic suffering of Americans if it means a return to power.
Its the same situation with the proposed action against Saddam Hussein. Democrats know that Saddam is a threat. They know that he has hidden stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons and that he is working on the production of a nuclear bomb.
Heres a scenario that sends Democrats diving under their beds. Bush launches the military action against Saddam. Soon after the first cruise missiles strike their targets one of two things happens. Either (a) Saddam flees into exile and the Iraqi army throws down its arms; or, (b) Iraqs army refuses to fight and some of Saddams advisors take care of their most vexing problem. American armed forces move into Saddam to restore order and to stand guard over the orderly transition of power to a new Iraqi regime. Within weeks our armed forces do what the Inspectors havent done; they find vast stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons and the hard evidence of a nuclear weapons program. They also find incontrovertible evidence of connections between Saddam and Al Qaeda terrorists. The American people, even those who opposed the action, come to the realization that Bush was right, and that he has quite possibly saved America from further terrorist attacks. The Democrats prepare for triage after the 2004 elections.
Are the Democrats that treacherous? I think they are. To them, power is everything. Only they know what is best for this country and how we should live our personal and individual lives. Theyve been reading the pundits predictions of a generation of Republican rule, and theyre ready to throw their mothers under the bus to make sure it doesnt happen.
Always have. Always will.
As Rush is fond of saying ... political power to democ"RATS" is religion ... they will do whatever it takes to preserve it, or, if out of power (as they are now) will stop at nothing to regain it.
if we go into Iraq there will be terrorist attacks all across our country
Should also be easily dealt with. Throughout the 1990's we were subjected to Terrorist attacks, but we did nothing in response. This strategy did not prevent further attacks. If we now turn and run and show the world that we are afraid to attack the sponsors of Internal Terrorism, will that strategy protect us from further attacks? Only an idiot would take that stance. Democrats are idiots.
This is the same ideology that allowed Hitler to place "his struggle" (Mein Kampf) above any humanity and for Saddam's Baathist philosophy to place the ascension of Arabs above anything. Saddam also refers to himself as "the struggler."
Democrats have their own struggle and that is to be back in control of the most powerful country on Earth.
I've been saying that for over a year. I truly feel that leading Rats (Dasshole, Pelosi, Hill etc.) are just as much a threat to the good of this country as OBL himself. I'm not saying they would kill Americans (well leave Hillary out of that, we know she's a killer), but they would be more dangerous than OBL if they were in power. Just look what happened while Slick was in power for 8 years. If the Rep's hadn't been in control of congress we'd be in worse shape. We must keep them from power.
Hitlery actually tried to get a simple law passed to remove the Electoral College?
I'm surprised they don't try to get some leftist courts to abolish it. That's how they get all the rest of their unconstitutional crap in place, without having to go through the "too hard" process of Constitutional Amendment.
Somehow, I haven't the slightest doubt that this statement is true. For the Dems, this means war. And given the way things are shaping up in public opinion, this means asymmetrical war -- and they are the "terrorists." Lie, cheat, steal...the end (holding on to power, even if illegitimately) justifies any means. Get ready for a wild ride! Thanks for the post, conservativecorner.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.