THE DAILY TELEGRAPH: Old Europe rebuffed

The Daily Telegraph ^ | January 31, 2003 | The Daily Telegraph

[McGavin999]

Even so, I have no doubt that even in our present state, we could defeat them.

You ever need us, just whistle, we'll be there in a New York minute. Americans have LONG memories and we never let down a friend, and we never, never forget an enemy.

[skinkinthegrass]

I wish to echo #8 comments :)

[Grampa Dave]

Being relevant or irrelevant are the two key words for this part of the new Century. If you become irrelevant or make your country irrelevant, it is the kiss of death for that country.

GW started the ball rolling in the UN last September when he challenged the UN to take an active roll in disarming Soddomite or become irrelevant. We have watched the UN become more irrelevant each day since November.

Before this year is over, we will see added to the long of list of irrelevant countries as you noted France and Germany, every other Eurotrash country that sides with their rich Uncle Soddomite, France and Germany.

I'm afraid that Canada is heading into irrelevance or a possible breakup as those provinces with a sense of worth not a love perversity and socialism decide to pull away from the socialist/pro Islamofascist French Canadians in control now.

Two of the last communist toeholds, N Korea and Communist Cuba will just disappear when the tyrants who rule them die. When this happens, Chavez will get killed or will run away in exile.

Iraq will cease to exist sometime this year, and Iran and Syria will fold up and disappear. New lines and countries will be the standard in the Middle East. Opec will begin to disappear and fade away when Saddam is whacked.

The UN is over the edge and sliding down the slipery slope to becoming irrelevant.

Nato is heading the same way. Nato serves no real function in the world.

We will see new alliances formed around those who are with us and not against us. These alliances will be strong in trade and commerce and stand against future tyrants. Without the UN to protect future tyrants, they will be short lived once identified.

After Iraq falls, Russia will get its act together and join this new alliance. So will India and Japan and the new Korea without the NK's.

Communist China is the unknown. Will the old line commies be able to hold on to power with their younger hard line generals/admirals? Or will communism slowly die and be replaced with the individual capitalism that the Chinese people do so well?

We are living in truly exciting times with tremendous opportunities for America and its old and new allies. It is time for all countries to decide to be with us and what is really best for the world or on the dark side with Saddam and what is bad for the world.

[Mo1]

Beautifully put TontoKowalski

Thank You Ivan and Thank You Citizens of Britain

[davidtalker]

Ivan thanks for these updates. As others have pointed out, we appreciate the UK and Tony Blair at this crucial moment in our history.

What many Freepers may not realize is how difficult this process has been on Blair. This is far more perilous for him than it is for Bush. Blair's own Party is his greatest problem. My understanding is that this policy is very unpopular amongst the populace in the UK. If things don't go just right in Iraq it's the end of Blair's political career, He truly is a profile in courage at this moment.

I am a radio talkshow host here in the States. Evans Ambrose-Pritchard of the Telegraph has been a fine resource for me for years now. We miss him over here. I have had him as a guest on my show numerous times. I must say, he is a fine journalist and a brave one too. He went to Arkansas and got deeply involved in searching down the skeletons in Klintoon's large closet. His books on these subjects are first rate.