To: beavus; realpatriot71
The points here are as follows:
1. If the zygote is human and it is life, it is human life.
2. No one can prove that a human spirit does not exist along with a zygote, simply by saying that the cells do not seem to support sentience.
3. As to which zygotes are purposed to live longer, or be duplicated genetically, and which are not, in our natural law theory of law this is not recognized as a decision that man is capable of making, only nature's God.
This is not a matter of "religious fundamentalists" or anyone else imposing belief upon another so as to violate his human rights. It is a recognition of a purpose to prevent unsupportable beliefs from being imposed upon natural human life, in order to tamper with its genetic makeup, or to genetically choose what should become life, or to terminate its life.
227 posted on
02/03/2003 5:49:28 AM PST by
unspun
("When I consider your heavens... what is man that YOU are mindful of him?" - Psalm 8)
To: unspun
1. If the zygote is human and it is life, it is human life.
2. No one can prove that a human spirit does not exist along with a zygote, simply by saying that the cells do not seem to support sentience.
3. As to which zygotes are purposed to live longer, or be duplicated genetically, and which are not, in our natural law theory of law this is not recognized as a decision that man is capable of making, only nature's God. 1. If a MACROPHAGE is human and it is life, it is human life.
2. No one can prove that a human spirit does not exist along with within a PIZZA, simply by saying that the PEPPARONIS do not seem to support sentience.
in our natural law theory of law this is not recognized as a decision that man is capable of making.
Actually, the laws of physics determine what "man is capable of making".
genetically choose what should become life
What does this mean?
234 posted on
02/03/2003 5:12:26 PM PST by
beavus
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson