Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Polonium Radiohalos and the Age of the Earth - Update
Institute for Creaton Research ^ | November 2002 | Andrew Snelling, Ph.D.

Posted on 01/31/2003 9:04:13 AM PST by CalConservative

RADIOHALOS - SIGNIFICANT AND EXCITING RESEARCH RESULTS
- IMPACT No. 353 November 2002
by Andrew A. Snelling, Ph.D.*


© Copyright 2002 Institute for Creation Research. All Rights Reserved

Two years ago it was reported that polonium (Po) radiohalos were still "a very tiny mystery."1 Since then, extensive research into the geological occurrence and distribution of Po, uranium (U) and thorium (Th) radiohalos has been undertaken as part of the RATE project,2 so now there are some preliminary results to report that are both significant and exciting.

What are Radiohalos?

Radiohalos are minute spherical zones of discoloration surrounding tiny mineral crystals included in larger host mineral grains in certain rocks, particularly granites. Alpha-particles produced by radioactive decay of U, Th, and their decay products (including Po) in the tiny mineral inclusions (often zircons) penetrate the surrounding host minerals (often the dark mica, biotite) damaging their crystal lattices. Because the a-particles emitted by the different radionuclides in the U and Th decay chains have different energies, they travel different distances. Where the a-particles stop they do the most damage, resulting in spherical shells of intense discoloration, which are concentric ring structures when the rocks are studied in thin (cross) sections. Therefore, it is possible to identify which radionuclides were responsible for producing the observed radiohalos.

There are three Po radionuclides in the 238U decay chain—218Po, 214Po and 210Po. All decay very rapidly and so have very short half-lives—3.1 minutes, 164 micro-seconds and 138 days respectively. Thus the occurrence in granitic rocks of 218Po, 214Po, and 210Po radiohalos, exhibiting only the rings produced by these Po radionuclides because only these respective radionuclides were present in the radiocenters when the radiohalos formed (figure 1), has been interpreted as indicating instantaneous formation of both the Po radiohalos and the granitic rocks.3

U and Th radiohalos are not without significance either. Dark, fully-formed U and Th radiohalos are estimated to have required around 100 million years worth of radioactive decay at today's rates to have formed,4 so their presence in granitic rocks throughout the geologic record globally would seemingly imply that at least 100 million years worth of radioactive decay at today's rates has occurred during Earth history.5

The RATE Research

The initial focus of the research has been granitic rocks that had to have formed during the Flood year. In each case there is unequivocal evidence that the granitic rocks formed by the melting during metamorphism (changes in rocks induced by heat and pressure) of fossiliferous Flood-deposited sedimentary layers, and that the resultant granitic magmas (melted rocks) then intruded into other Flood-deposited layers. Such Flood-related granitic rocks investigated thus far include the Stone Mountain granite near Atlanta (Georgia), the La Posta zoned granodiorite and related granites in the Peninsular Ranges of southern California east of San Diego, and the Cooma granodiorite and four other granitic bodies in southeastern Australia.

The biotite grains in all these granitic rocks have large numbers of 210Po radio-halos within them, often 4-10 times the numbers of 214Po radiohalos. Dark, fully- formed 238U radiohalos (figure 2) usually occur as equally often as the 214Po radio-halos. 218Po radiohalos are very rare. However, in the Cooma granodiorite and the four other granites of southeastern Australia there are more 238U radiohalos than any of the Po radiohalos, while in two of these granites there are as many 214Po radio-halos as 210Po radiohalos. Dark, fully-formed Th radiohalos are also common in the Cooma granodiorite.

U Radiohalos and Accelerated Decay

What then is the significance of these radiohalos, discovered in this first ever systematic search in these granitic rocks? The presence in them of so many dark, fully-formed U and Th radiohalos clearly implies that at least 100 million years worth of radioactive decay at today's rates must have occurred in these granitic rocks since they formed. However, these granitic rocks evidently formed only recently during the Flood year, so this implies that at least 100 million years worth of radioactive decay at today's rates must have occurred during the Flood year, when geologic processes were operating at catastrophic rates. Thus the rates of radioactive decay had to have been accelerated during the Flood year and therefore conventional radioisotopic dating of rocks, which assumes constant decay rates, is unreliable and conventional "ages" are grossly in error.

Furthermore, such accelerated radioactive decay would have generated a large pulse of heat during the Flood. This in turn would have helped to initiate and drive the global tectonic processes that operated during the Flood year, and to accomplish catastrophically much geologic work, including the regional metamorphism of sedimentary strata and the melting of crustal and mantle rocks to produce granitic and other magmas.

Po Radiohalo Formation and Rapid Geologic Processes

However, the Po radiohalos are also still highly significant, due to their exceedingly short half-lives. Because these granitic rocks containing them are neither created nor primordial, the Po that parented these Po radiohalos cannot have been primordial.6 Whatever secondary processes were thus responsible for separating the necessary Po from its parent U and concentrating it into the radiocenters, the timescale involved had to be very short.

Limited space here precludes a full technical explanation and detailed justification of a proposed mechanism for Po radiohalo formation, but a comprehensive paper is being prepared for presentation at next summer's International Conference on Creationism.7 In summary, many related lines of evidence suggest a viable hydrothermal (hot water) fluid transport model in which the immediate precursors to the Po isotopes, probably accompanied by the Po isotopes themselves, were carried exceedingly short distances within the biotite flakes from U decay in adjacent enclosed zircon grains. The Po isotopes were then continuously concentrated in appropriate radiocenters by attractive ions in lattice defects within the biotite flakes, and the Po radiohalos then formed.

The implications are far-reaching. Because the half-lives of these Po isotopes are very short, the hydrothermal fluid transport had to be extremely rapid. The hydrothermal fluids are generated as the granitic magmas cool, so the timeframe for the cooling of these granitic magmas has to have been extremely short (only days!) as the expelled hydrothermal fluids also carried away the heat.8 Because hydrothermal fluids also transport other metals in solution (such as gold, tin, copper, lead, zinc), these rapid flows of hydrothermal fluids had the potential to also rapidly deposit metallic ores, again within days! And finally, preliminary reports of U, Th, and Po radiohalos in regionally metamorphosed rocks9 could confirm that large-scale rapid flows of hydrothermal fluids catastrophically formed regional metamorphic complexes.10

Perhaps the Po radiohalos are no longer "a very tiny mystery." If so, the U, Th, and Po radiohalos are potentially powerful evidence of the catastrophic geologic processes within the Flood year on a young Earth. Investigations are continuing on Flood-related granites; other investigations are now going to include pre-Flood granitic rocks that might extend this evidence even back into the Creation Week.

Endnotes and References



TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: agedating; creation; crevo; crevolist; evolution
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-82 next last
To: PatrickHenry
"My work involves chaining together several creationists in a rubber room. You get infinite output of hot air, yet there is no observable input of any kind.
"

Stop that at once! I just ruined another keyboard. But, I suppose I'll have to learn not to drink Coke while reading threads about creationism.
21 posted on 01/31/2003 1:19:38 PM PST by MineralMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: MineralMan
Evolution is a blizzard and you have your lights on bright !

So you're flying in the blind // fog !!

Do me a favor...

everytime you back up // driving---

think of this !

If you see yourself in the mirror...

you're not driving // thinking safely (( gonna crash ))

you're going to have to adjust // angle the mirrors---

in the direction you're going (( not circles // spirals // flips // spins // rolls )) !

Get some windex .. .. .. too much glare // self // BS ! ! !
22 posted on 01/31/2003 1:43:54 PM PST by f.Christian (Orcs of the world: Take note and beware.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: CalConservative
It would be a little better, for starters, if he cited himself less than 50% of the time. Of course, he not only has the burden of proving himself correct, but also proving why all the existing science (including but not limited to carbon dating, mathematics and physics of radioactive decay, geology) is wrong.
23 posted on 01/31/2003 1:45:24 PM PST by jiggyboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MineralMan
Stop that at once!

I can't help it. Were I to take these people seriously, I'd be a very grim person indeed.

24 posted on 01/31/2003 1:46:21 PM PST by PatrickHenry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: jiggyboy
The bottom half of the geologic column (( no fossils )) formed from below . . .

and the top half formed rather quickly from above (( no intermediary fossils )) - - -

uniformism (( time )) // evolution is ==== gone // over // never happened !


25 posted on 01/31/2003 1:48:17 PM PST by f.Christian (Orcs of the world: Take note and beware.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

Comment #26 Removed by Moderator

To: PatrickHenry
The ph persona . . . one dimenion in an unknown // fabricated universe !
27 posted on 01/31/2003 1:50:05 PM PST by f.Christian (Orcs of the world: Take note and beware.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: jiggyboy
I've seen every bug eyed evolutionist staring off at every canyon -- mountain -- bug .. .. ..

thinking // believing how it all grew out of a washed out mudball === looney !

28 posted on 01/31/2003 2:03:55 PM PST by f.Christian (Orcs of the world: Take note and beware.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: guaguanco
Evolution actually reminds me of the guy // skeleton // fossil they found stuck in the chimney .. .. ..

he actually believed in the story (( chimney trick // santa claus )) to try it - - -

guess he didn't know anything about smoke // chimney flues !
29 posted on 01/31/2003 2:20:06 PM PST by f.Christian (Orcs of the world: Take note and beware.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: f.Christian
Evolution actually reminds me of the guy // skeleton // fossil they found stuck in the chimney .. .. ..

National "Hide-and-Seek" Champion for 1959.

30 posted on 01/31/2003 2:21:35 PM PST by VadeRetro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: dpwiener
Recent scientific analysis of DU fragments recovered from the 1991 Gulf War indicate an almost total absence of the isotope U-235.

Your post gave me this warped thought...

Recent scientific analysis of DU fragments recovered fromt the Democrat Underground website indicate an almost total absence of intellgence in the posters there :o)

31 posted on 01/31/2003 2:23:55 PM PST by Poohbah (Beware the fury of a patient man -- John Dryden)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: VadeRetro
Obviously the guy wasn't a bricklayer .. .. ..

school drop out - - - cook !
32 posted on 01/31/2003 2:25:38 PM PST by f.Christian (Orcs of the world: Take note and beware.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: balrog666
Or, perhaps it is ignored because it's idiocy.

You guys are going to have to do a little better than just calling it idiocy--- or can we now discredit evo posts by simply calling them more of the same stupidity?

If indeed it is idiocy, you should be able to tell us all why.

33 posted on 01/31/2003 2:33:19 PM PST by Dataman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
I just emailed this to my geology teacher from high school...he's laughing so hard on the phone that he can't talk...

Well, then, refute it.

34 posted on 01/31/2003 2:34:34 PM PST by Dataman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: guaguanco
Thanks for the morning laugh!

You're #4. Refute it.

35 posted on 01/31/2003 2:35:19 PM PST by Dataman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Junior
An ancient creationist canard rears its hoary head.

You're #5. Refute it.

36 posted on 01/31/2003 2:36:05 PM PST by Dataman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Comment #37 Removed by Moderator

To: VadeRetro
Everybody who thinks ICR has something to do with science has already copied every article onto FR's server space multiple times. This stuff is pure idiocy.

You're #6. The sixth cerebral evo to mock but offer nothing in the way of refutation.

38 posted on 01/31/2003 2:37:21 PM PST by Dataman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: CalConservative
Normally, real scientists can find journal articles to cite that aren't golden oldies. 1973, 1967, 1988, 1989 were all very good years for wine.

And citing your own bogus crap doesn't count.

39 posted on 01/31/2003 2:39:34 PM PST by Chancellor Palpatine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dataman
I'm also #11. Refute it.
40 posted on 01/31/2003 2:40:16 PM PST by VadeRetro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-82 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson