[jiggyboy]

It would be a little better, for starters, if he cited himself less than 50% of the time. Of course, he not only has the burden of proving himself correct, but also proving why all the existing science (including but not limited to carbon dating, mathematics and physics of radioactive decay, geology) is wrong.

[f.Christian]

The bottom half of the geologic column (( no fossils )) formed from below . . .

and the top half formed rather quickly from above (( no intermediary fossils )) - - -

uniformism (( time )) // evolution is ==== gone // over // never happened !

[f.Christian]

I've seen every bug eyed evolutionist staring off at every canyon -- mountain -- bug .. .. ..

thinking // believing how it all grew out of a washed out mudball === looney !

[Dataman]

Of course, he not only has the burden of proving himself correct, but also proving why all the existing science (including but not limited to carbon dating, mathematics and physics of radioactive decay, geology) is wrong.

True, the burden of proof is on the new idea. Unfortunately that rule of logic has not been applied to evolution. The burden of proof is still on evolution. If there were proof, you all would have presented it to the world by now. You would have claimed the rewards offered for proof.