Listen to David McAlary's report (RealAudio) McAlary report - Download 583k (RealAudio)Posted on 02/01/2003 8:02:03 PM PST by Destro
NASA Grounds Shuttle Fleet While Probing Columbia Disaster
David McAlary
Washington
02 Feb 2003, 01:22 UTC
Listen to David McAlary's report (RealAudio) McAlary report - Download 583k (RealAudio)
The U.S. space agency, NASA, is suspending future shuttle flights until it knows what caused the loss of the shuttle Columbia and its seven- member crew. Columbia broke up over Texas Saturday minutes before it was to land in Florida after a 16-day research mission in Earth orbit.
Seven astronauts, including the first from Israel, went down to their deaths in a hail of shuttle debris over Texas. Dramatic videotapes from a Dallas television station show it streaking to Earth in several smoking pieces.
Shuttle officials say the first sign of a problem was the loss of readings from sensors that measure tire pressure and temperature and structural heat on the orbiter's left side as it at headed toward landing at 18 times the speed of sound. Chief flight director Milt Heflin says controllers lost all contact with the shuttle minutes later.
"We lost the data and that's when we clearly began to know that we had a bad day," he said.
News reports tell of shuttle remains strewn across a wide area of east Texas. NASA is sending technicians to Texas to collect it with help from national, state, and local emergency agencies. NASA administrator Sean O'Keefe has established both an internal and independent external review board to investigate the cause of the disaster.
"This is indeed a tragic day for the NASA family, for the families of the astronauts, and likewise tragic for the nation," said Mr. O'Keefe.
The head of the shuttle program, Ron Dittemore, says debris analysis is key to understanding what happened to Columbia. He pledged a non-stop effort to assess it and all related flight data.
"It's going to take us some time to work through the evidence and the analysis to clearly understand what the cause was," he explained. "We will be poring over that data 24 hours a day for the foreseeable future."
Pending the answer, NASA is suspending all space shuttle flights. It has stopped preparing orbiters for flight at the Kennedy Space Center launch site, including the one that was scheduled to exchange crews at the International Space Station in early March.
A Russian supply rocket, set for launch Sunday, is bringing supplies that NASA says will support the station crew through late June.
Seventeen years ago, the shuttle Challenger exploded shortly after launch, but the Columbia disaster is the first time a shuttle has been lost returning from orbit since the program began 113 missions ago in 1981.
At the U.S. Naval War College in Newport, Rhode Island, space expert Joan Johnston-Freese notes that takeoff and landings are the most dangerous times for space shuttles.
"That's when the maximum pressure and velocity occur," she said. "The shuttle lands as a large glider and control is always a challenge, but under those conditions of pressure and velocity, the shuttle is so super-heated at that point that it's a very volatile situation under the best of conditions."
As part of NASA's probe, technicians will look for any signs that an unusual launch incident may have damaged critical insulating tiles on the shuttle's left wing, the side of the shuttle where the sensor readings went dead. Insulation from the rocket that helped boost Columbia to orbit flew off and hit the wing during liftoff.
Shuttle manager Dittemore says that after exhaustive analysis early in the mission, flight engineers determined that it probably would have no affect on the flight. But given Columbia's loss, he did not dismiss the potential impact to the wing.
"We're going to go back and see if there is a connection. Is that the smoking gun? It is not. We don't know enough about it. A lot more analysis and evidence needs to come to the table," he emphasized. "It's not fair to represent the tile damage as the source. It's just something we need to go look at."
When the Columbia disaster occurred, NASA administrator O'Keefe was at the Kennedy Space Center in Florida awaiting the shuttle's return with the families and friends of the astronauts. What was to be a happy reunion turned into grief-stricken moments of consolation. Mr. O'Keefe paid tribute to the astronauts, whom he said dedicated their lives to facing scientific challenges for all of us on Earth.
"The loss of this valued crew is something we will never be able to get over and certainly the families of all of them," he said. "We have assured them we will do everything, everything, we can possibly do to guarantee that they work their way through this horrific tragedy."
Security had been tighter than usual at the landing site because the presence of Israeli astronaut Ilan Ramon prompted government fears that he might be the target of a terrorist attack. However, NASA says there is no indication that terrorism is involved in the shuttle loss.
The only thing that comes quickly to mind are the Navy dirigibles Akron and Macon. The Akron crashed 4 April 1933 on her 74th flight. The Macon's final flight also ended in a crash on 12 February 1935, on her 54th flight.
The Macon's flight ended the Navy's rigid airship program, though they continued to fly nonrigid blimps until 31 August 1962 with a much better safety record.
That isn't in the cards; a fresh, new program to explore and develop outer space with renewed American determination is. International cooperation will be welcomed. Foreign astronauts will be encouraged to participate.
Israel was very proud of their astronaut and happy to participate with the American space program. They will be more than pleased to continue, especially considering the sacrifices made by all parties. The bond is stronger than ever.
You can make 15% selling toothpaste. Further, a billion dollars won't even get you started. The R & D alone would cost many times that.
Imagine yourself sitting in front of the board of directors proposing to put all of the assets of the company on the line for a 15% profit if you succeed. Now imagine convincing a bunch of bankers to finance this project.
Boeing is having some dificulties getting financing for its next generation passenger jumbo jet because of the huge costs. There is simply no company which can or would take this kind of risk.
Space is our future. We must get off this rotting apple and go to the frontier of space. It is our destiny, our future and our right.
If we do not, we will all perish in our own excrement.
LOL! The Soyuz is comparable to Apollo without the frills. It can't carry large payloads, It can only carry 3 to four people like sardines. It is nothing but a tin can on a bunch of bottle rockets.
I think a space plane is more the proper vehicle. Large payload capacity. (it could be built to about any size) A re-usable airframe and no expensive polluting boosters.
Larger transport vehicles could be built in space if a dock were available. That is why a large payload capacity is needed.
Rocket boosters are terribly obsolete.
However, I am saying that there is no economical reason to go to Mars. If it doesn't make good business sense, it probably won't happen in the private sector. Private companies can build the hardware but only the government can absorb the costs involved.
One of the radio stations talked with Congressman Jim Sensenbrenner (R-WI) about some of the questions you have raised. His thoughts (very loose paraphrasing of what I remember) were in synch with yours. He did state the shuttle was 40-year old technology and he hoped NASA would not replace Columbia and start phasing out the shuttle program.
I was left with the impression that he was not the only elected official with this point of view. Could be the public needs to start putting some pressure on Congress to nudge NASA along to the next step in the space exploration process.
Primary payloads -- ISS seventeenth flight (ULF1)/Multi-Purpose Logistics Module, crew rotation
Bowersox, Budarin and Pettit are up there now:
I can't imagine what today's been like for them up there.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.