Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why Do Palestinians Need a State?
Arutz Sheva ^ | 02 February 2003 | Bruce S. Ticker

Posted on 02/02/2003 11:43:17 AM PST by SJackson

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-60 last
To: SJackson
If they have land and they are a people they should have their own state.

If they act like monsters then they should be treated as such.

Thats the rock and a hardplace right now...
41 posted on 02/02/2003 5:40:27 PM PST by antaresequity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: anotherview
Nobody wants them is correct . They have been run out of Jordan & Lebanon also . It does not bode well to be a group of malcontents while claiming to be victims in the same breath .
42 posted on 02/02/2003 5:44:59 PM PST by Ben Bolt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: MoJo2001
You might want to look at what happened in "Black September".

IMO the Palestinians will get a state...when they decide to really make peace with Israel.
On the rediculious assumption that a Palestinian state happens before peace with Israel one of two things will happen'
1 It will be used as a springboard for attacks on Israel, something Israel will stand about 38 sec.
2 One of their arab "brothere in the surrounding states will just move in and take it over.



43 posted on 02/02/2003 6:00:07 PM PST by Valin (Age and deceit beat youth and skill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
Maybe they don't belong there in the first place? Palestinians are no more a nationality of people than the Oompa Loompas. God gave the land of Canaan to the Israelites. If the Palestinians have an issue with that, I suggest they take it up with the Being who gave it to the Israelis.

If the Palestinians want a state so badly I would suggest they go live with their terrorist friends the Saudis. The Jews have been kicked around for thousands of years, killed in massive numbers, and still the world doesn't feel they've 'given' enough. You give Palestinians a 'homeland' (which it really isn't considering they're just other Arab nationalities claiming to be Palestinians, they've already got homes) and the next thing you'll see is the Palestinians calling for dissolution of Israel

44 posted on 02/02/2003 6:08:53 PM PST by billbears (Deo Vindice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
Deportation of Arabs from Israel to a palistinian state, that would be unacceptable to the world.

It's hard to see why, the world is perfectly willing to accept most everything else Israel gets away with.

45 posted on 02/02/2003 7:10:50 PM PST by Ichabod Walrus (I wonder if somebody will clean up the garbage in 2003?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
Jews as a people needed a homeland as a refuge from 2000 years of all forms of abuse, which culminated in the murder of six million of our brethren.

If that's the case, why are there more Jews living outside Israel than will ever live there? Furthermore, why are they increasingly migrating to places like Germany and Austria? Furthermore, are Jews the only people who have suffered abuse in the last 2000 years? Or is the author suggesting they are the only ones who matter?

46 posted on 02/02/2003 7:15:32 PM PST by Ichabod Walrus (I wonder if somebody will clean up the garbage in 2003?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ichabod Walrus
It's hard to see why, the world is perfectly willing to accept most everything else Israel gets away with.


Maybe in your world, but here in the real world it's a little different
47 posted on 02/02/2003 7:31:55 PM PST by Valin (Age and deceit beat youth and skill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Valin
Oh yes, that's right.

The US is actually increasing aid to Israel at the same time it makes these meaningless statements about halting settlements or cutting down on assassinating 10 year old rock throwers isn't it?

How's that for real world politcs?

48 posted on 02/02/2003 8:24:14 PM PST by Ichabod Walrus (I wonder if somebody will clean up the garbage in 2003?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: white trash redneck
The best argument for a Palestinian state is demographic. The Arabs will soon outnumber Jews in Israel.

Well, considering that just about every country surrounding Israel kicked out their Jews, why can't Israel kick out the pali squatters? They can go back home with arafart to Egypt, or back to Syria and whatever other holes from which they crawled.

49 posted on 02/02/2003 8:56:47 PM PST by NYC GOP Chick (1-3-5-9, There's no such thing as "palestine")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Ichabod Walrus
the world
The US

If you meant the world you should SAY the world, if you mean the US then say US.

cutting down on assassinating 10 year old rock throwers isn't it?

I (for one) would like to see your proof of Israel killing ten year olds.
50 posted on 02/02/2003 9:04:31 PM PST by Valin (Age and deceit beat youth and skill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: billbears
Maybe they don't belong there in the first place?

They were born there. In most cases their fathers were born there and their grandfathers. I's the only home that they know, miserable as it may be, and I'm suggesting that they may not be inclined to pull up stakes and move just because you might want them to.

Palestinians are no more a nationality of people than the Oompa Loompas. The Oompa Loompas at least have the homeland that Wonka gave them.

51 posted on 02/03/2003 3:37:08 AM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
You are missing the point. The Palestinians do not want the West Bank and they do not Gaza. They want the whole of Israel. In 1974, they signed the Phased Plan which stated they would settle for a small part of the territory now to begin the "liberation" of Palestine. Since 1974, they have been systematically working toward this goal.

Giving them their own state will not solve anything but make it worse. The Palestinians are determined to remove "the cancer tumor from the midst of the Arab people."

Furthermore, it isn't really Palestinian versus Israel. It's Arab versus Israel. The Palestinians are the weapon in the Arabs hand.

Widening the circle, it isn't Arab versus Israel. It's the Arabs versus the West. The Arabs see Israel as the foothold of Western Civilization on their land. That foothold has only one purpose... to further humilitate and oppress Islam. That is what this war is about.

The fact that the West sides with the Arab by forcing Israel into an impossible retreat of its rights shows the Arabs that the West will not even defend itself.

A wall won't separate Israel from the Arabs. You can't move on from an enemy bent on your destruction and extermination.

You wrote "at some point, even the Palestinians will realize thaty they have most of what they asked for." They have had it since 1993. Oslo gave them control over the 90% of the Area A. That still wasn't enough. They were given everything they wanted in 2000, their response was the intifadah.

Words are cheap in the West. When our leaders speak... most of us take it with a grain of salt because it is nothing more than political rhetoric. Therefore, IMO, we think that Arab rhetoric is just that. But, it isn't. They have proven that they will do what they say. Right now, they lack the proper weapons to take on Israel properly. But, they are ever working to gain control of those weapons.

Israel is the forward guard of this clash of civilizations. Instead of forcing Israel to retreat because the West is terrified of upsetting the Arabs, we need to strengthen Israel's hand and stand with them. After all, their fight is our fight. Remember 9/11. (not that you forgot... I know you haven't. But I bring it up to show that the conflict is the same.)

52 posted on 02/03/2003 5:16:37 AM PST by carton253
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: speekinout
And a Palestinian state could not be allowed to arm itself. Nor could it be allowed to harbor arms from another country. An International plan to defend it would be necessary.

How are you going to prevent this? Oslo called for the turning in of all illegal weapons. The Palestinians admitted they had 28,000 illegal arms in the West Bank. Only 12 were turned in.

How are you going to prevent Hizbollah from arming the Palestinians, or Syria, or Iran. The Arabs are moving with one collective motive to destroy Israel. What's a stinking international law. Nothing but a nuisance. The Palestinians are armed and will remain armed.

53 posted on 02/03/2003 5:19:47 AM PST by carton253
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: MoJo2001
The Palis were kicked out of Jordan - they want nothing to do with the whackjobs.
54 posted on 02/03/2003 5:29:05 AM PST by lodwick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: carton253
The logical conclusion to your position is that the situation can only be resolved with one side exterminating the other. And, in fact, that might be true.

I think that's unacceptable and that an interim solution has to be found until such time as the Palestinians (or arabs as a whole) come to the conclusion that Israel has a right to exist in peace.

55 posted on 02/03/2003 5:58:34 AM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
Well, I understand your point. But, I think it will be a cold day in hell when the Palestinians (or the Arabs as a whole) come to the conclusion that Israel has the right to exist in peace. We've been waiting for 100 years.

I think that right to exist is going to have to be forced on them.

Do I think the Palestinians have to be exterminated? Absolutely not! I don't think I even suggested it in my post.

What I am saying is that we are at war whether we realize it or not. The problem is not Israel nor has it ever been Israel. It is about the humiliation of Islam. That is where the fight is. 9/11 wasn't the beginning, nor will it be the end. Wars have to be fought and won. Half-measures... retreat and peace talks don't do any good when one side is not for peace but extermination.

Putting a Palestinian state on Israel's border without addressing this deep seeded seething hatred of the West by the Arabs will only lead another war. But Israel is being systematically weakened by those in the West who think if Israel gives and gives and gives that somehow the Arabs will be satisified. And the Arabs watch our attempts at appeasement and think we are weak and ripe for plucking.

Israel must be strengthened. So must the West. It is war! Declared on us by the Islamic fundamentalists whose cause and strength grows with each passing day.

56 posted on 02/03/2003 6:16:36 AM PST by carton253
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: carton253
Do I think the Palestinians have to be exterminated? Absolutely not! I don't think I even suggested it in my post.

No, you didn't even hint at it, and I certainly wasn't accusing you of it.

But I think there has to be some sort of resolution of the status of the West Bank and Gaza. Even if the Palestinians don't like it, we have to say, "This is it. Learn to live with it."

The limbo status of those territories ensures that it will be a continuing source of unrest and violence.

I'm not recommending that it be done today. We are in a war with Islam, and we're about to change the dynamics in a big way in Iraq. I'm even somewhat optimistic that the outcome will cascade through the entire Middle East. The ayatollas may be on the verge of collapse in Iran and that would be a huge development. The dinosaurs running Saudi Arabia could be next.

If a new environment develops, it may be possible to forge a lasting peace for Israel. It's a hope.

57 posted on 02/03/2003 6:50:53 AM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
If a new environment develops, it may be possible to forge a lasting peace for Israel. It's a hope.

It's a good hope to have.

58 posted on 02/03/2003 7:01:45 AM PST by carton253
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: carton253
I wasn't thinking of guns. I was thinking of military armament. That's much easier to control. Not perfectly, of course, but it's easier to track the sources and detect it.
Unless you are one of the people who really thinks we don't know that Saddam has WMD.
59 posted on 02/03/2003 4:18:54 PM PST by speekinout
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: speekinout
There is no way to change the situation by conventional means. Walls? Truces? Peace treaties? Cash payments? We have tried them all and they don't work. Military might? they run squealing to CNN. Transfer? Rabin tried exiling 115 terrorists and nobody would accept them.

The only way to change the situation is by changing the people. Prozac in the water might stop their hatred and make them think of the consequences for a moment. Nothing else will.

Anyone find that fish that gives you three wishes?
60 posted on 02/04/2003 12:38:22 AM PST by FreeReporting
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-60 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson