Why is it that so often that the wonderful decent, good, people of America are infertile?
1 posted on
02/06/2003 7:44:17 PM PST by
friendly
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
To: friendly
Why is it that so often that the wonderful decent, good, people of America are infertile?Because they've bought in on the notion that they can only have one kid, or they get married too late, or they are both employed (two-income families tend to find the breadwinners too stressed to boink each other--which IS a precondition for having kidlets), et cetera, and so on, and so forth, and the beat goes on...
2 posted on
02/06/2003 7:47:35 PM PST by
Poohbah
(Beware the fury of a patient man -- John Dryden)
To: friendly
Why is depopulation a disaster?
There is absolutely no need for more than a billion people. Land is finite. Less people makes more land available for the ones left.
So9
To: friendly
Russia's population is dropping - as the article alludes - because in the post-Soviet era men in general feel they cannot afford a family, and are also managing to kill themselves off at a faster rate. It has very little connection or relevance to why birthrates are dropping in Western Europe & America.
5 posted on
02/06/2003 7:51:14 PM PST by
AntiGuv
(™)
To: friendly
Here are two interesting charts. One shows the top 15 countries by population in 2002. The other chart shows the projected top 15 countries by population in 2050 - based on today's birth/death rate trends.
Note that India passes China as the most populous country while the United States stays at number three. Meanwhile, Russia nearly drops off the chart and Germany and France are nowhere to be found.
Worlds Largest Countries in 2002
Rank |
Country |
Population (millions) |
1 |
China |
1,281 |
2 |
India |
1,050 |
3 |
United States |
287 |
4 |
Indonesia |
217 |
5 |
Brazil |
174 |
6 |
Russia |
144 |
7 |
Pakistan |
144 |
8 |
Bangladesh |
134 |
9 |
Nigeria |
130 |
10 |
Japan |
127 |
11 |
Mexico |
102 |
12 |
Germany |
82 |
13 |
Philippines |
80 |
14 |
Vietnam |
80 |
15 |
Egypt |
71 |
Worlds Largest Countries in 2050
Rank |
Country |
Population (millions) |
1 |
India |
1,628 |
2 |
China |
1,394 |
3 |
United States |
413 |
4 |
Pakistan |
332 |
5 |
Indonesia |
316 |
6 |
Nigeria |
304 |
7 |
Brazil |
247 |
8 |
Bangladesh |
205 |
9 |
Congo, Dem. Rep. of |
182 |
10 |
Ethiopia |
173 |
11 |
Mexico |
151 |
12 |
Philippines |
146 |
13 |
Vietnam |
117 |
14 |
Egypt |
115 |
15 |
Russia |
102 |
6 posted on
02/06/2003 7:52:26 PM PST by
SamAdams76
('Faithless is he that says farewell when the road darkens')
To: friendly
According to Dr Paul Erlich depopulation would be a good thing.
8 posted on
02/06/2003 7:53:09 PM PST by
oyez
(Is this a great country...........Or what?)
To: friendly
There are few things that p!$$ me off more than the "Down With People" movement. Grrr
To: friendly
bump .... looks like this just might be the asian century then.
16 posted on
02/06/2003 8:31:10 PM PST by
Centurion2000
(Chance favors the prepared mind.)
To: friendly
Why is it that so often that the wonderful decent, good, people of America are infertile?Don't worry. We are 'importing' all the people we will need to stress social services, infrastructure, and further burden the few remaining taxpayers. They are reproducing at 3 times WASP rates. By 2050, the top 5 countries in population will all be 3rd world, including the US.
22 posted on
02/06/2003 9:27:21 PM PST by
spodefly
(This is my tag line. There are many like it, but this one is mine.)
To: nickcarraway
ping
To: friendly
The womb is the greatest weapon of mass destruction. The arabs have it, we don't.
38 posted on
02/07/2003 10:39:38 AM PST by
Cacique
(Censored by Admin Moderator!)
To: friendly
HUMANE VITAE ENCYCLICAL OF POPE PAUL VI
ON THE REGULATION OF BIRTH
July 25, 1968
To: friendly
"According to one Professor Antonov, 'Two thirds of Russian territory is settled now as sparsely as it was in the Neolithic Age: less than one person per square kilometerI'm not quite sure what this is supposed to prove, as many of the Russians living east of the Urals were forced by the Soviets to move there. I would imagine many of them returned back west the first chance they got.
41 posted on
02/07/2003 11:05:11 AM PST by
dirtboy
To: friendly
Paul Ehrlich and Herbert London -- two mirror-image junk scientists with the same phony gloom-n-doom.
44 posted on
02/07/2003 11:12:02 AM PST by
steve-b
To: friendly
According to one Professor Antonov, 'Two thirds of Russian territory is settled now as sparsely as it was in the Neolithic Age: less than one person per square kilometer. Why wasn't this posted in Breaking News -- AMAZING DISCOVERY: SCIENTIST FIGURES OUT THAT HARDLY ANYBODY WANTS TO LIVE ON ARCTIC TUNDRA!
Sheesh.
46 posted on
02/07/2003 11:16:18 AM PST by
steve-b
To: friendly
Steyn recommends: "Next time you're in a rundown diner and the 17-year-old waitress is eight months pregnant, don't tut "What a tragedy" and point her to the nearest Planned Parenthood clinic. Leave her a large tip instead. She's doing the right thing, not just for her, but for all of us." I've already been flamed once on this supposedly conservative forum for pointing out the stupidity of actively rewarding such behavior. I'm not sure if it's because "conservatives" don't think that getting knocked up at 17 is irresponsible, or because they think that personal irresponsibility should be subsidized in general.
47 posted on
02/07/2003 11:19:05 AM PST by
steve-b
To: friendly
All I know is that after 9-11, I'm (relatively) happy that my country is being
over-run by Catholic (and increasingly Protestant) Mexicans...than by Muslims.
I'm sure this makes me a bigot in many circles...
59 posted on
02/07/2003 11:56:30 AM PST by
VOA
To: ValerieUSA
112 posted on
03/10/2006 11:14:08 PM PST by
SunkenCiv
(Yes indeed, Civ updated his profile and links pages again, on Monday, March 6, 2006.)
To: AdmSmith; Berosus; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Fred Nerks; george76; ...
Note: this topic is from about five years ago. Maybe Putin lurks on FR. ;')
113 posted on
01/13/2008 7:03:51 PM PST by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/____________________Profile updated Sunday, December 30, 2007)
To: friendly
Steyn recommends: "Next time you're in a rundown diner and the 17-year-old waitress is eight months pregnant, don't tut "What a tragedy" and point her to the nearest Planned Parenthood clinic. Leave her a large tip instead. Steyn is an idiot. Someone with no proper means of supporting herself (the image that comes to mind is a greasy spoon, not l'Maison Ritz) has no business having kids -- and if she is, I'm almost certainly having my pocket picked already to pay for it, and can only compensate a bit by leaving no tip at all.
126 posted on
01/15/2008 8:08:46 AM PST by
steve-b
(Sin lies only in hurting others unnecessarily. All other "sins" are invented nonsense. --RAH)
To: friendly
Steyn recommends: "Next time you're in a rundown diner and the 17-year-old waitress is eight months pregnant Statistically, the girl who gets pregnant out of wedlock at 17 is likely to have, lifetime, only one or two children. It's better that she doesn't abort, but far better if she waits until she's 24 and then enters a stable, happy marriage.
Better than congratulating the waitress, how about thanking the 30-40 year old harried, married mother with 3 or 4 or 5 kids in tow at the supermarket for her generosity with life?
People with large families run into a fair amount of "tut-tut" disparagement and disapproval ... even from those who have no business expressing such, like their superiors at work.
128 posted on
01/15/2008 8:22:45 AM PST by
Campion
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson