Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Expansion of Patriot Act Criticized; Would Increase Spying, Restrict Data, Limit Judicial Review
Associated Press ^

Posted on 02/07/2003 3:20:51 PM PST by RCW2001

Critics Say Justice's Planned Expansion of Patriot Act Would Increase Spying, Restrict Data

The Associated Press

WASHINGTON Feb. 7

The Justice Department is preparing to expand the 2001 Patriot Act to increase surveillance within the United States while restricting access to information and limiting judicial review, a nonprofit government watchdog group asserted Friday.

The Center for Public Integrity said it obtained a copy of the draft legislation from a government source. The document, labeled "confidential," was posted Friday on the organization's Internet site along with an analysis.

Justice Department officials said no final decisions have made on any such legislation, and it could change substantially before it is completed. Spokeswoman Barbara Comstock acknowledged the department is "continually considering anti-terrorism measures and would be derelict if we were not doing so."

"The department's deliberations are always undertaken with the strongest commitment to our Constitution and civil liberties," she added.

The original Patriot Act, passed by Congress in the weeks following the Sept. 11, 2001, terror attacks, gave the government broad new anti-terrorism powers to use wiretaps, electronic and computer eavesdropping, searches and the authority to obtain a wide range of other information in it's investigations. It also broke down the traditional wall between FBI investigators and intelligence agents.

According to the Center for Public Integrity, the draft expansion of the Patriot Act would be called the Domestic Security Enhancement Act of 2003.

Among other things, it would prohibit disclosure of information regarding people detained as terrorist suspects and prevent the Environmental Protection Agency from distributing "worst-case scenario" information to the public about a nearby private company's use of chemicals.

In addition, the measure would create a DNA database of "suspected terrorists;" force suspects to prove why they should be released on bail, rather than have the prosecution prove why they should be held; and allow the deportation of U.S. citizens who become members of or help terrorist groups.

"It really is a broadening and a deepening of the government's powers," Lewis said.

Congressional aides said they had not been consulted by the Justice Department on the development of such a bill. However, several have said they considered it likely that the Bush administration would propose some changes this year.

On the Net: Center for Public Integrity:

Justice Department:



TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Front Page News; Government
KEYWORDS: billofrights
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 next last

1 posted on 02/07/2003 3:20:51 PM PST by RCW2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RCW2001
Give them a mile, and they'll keep taking inches.
2 posted on 02/07/2003 3:26:44 PM PST by AdamSelene235 (Like all the jolly good fellows,I drink my whiskey clear.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #3 Removed by Moderator

To: RCW2001
The department's deliberations are always undertaken with the strongest commitment to our Constitution and civil liberties," she added.

ROTFFLMGDAO.......

4 posted on 02/07/2003 3:59:10 PM PST by EBUCK (FIRE!....rounds downrange!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RCW2001
The Justice Department is preparing to expand the 2001 Patriot Act to increase surveillance within the United States while restricting access to information and limiting judicial review, a nonprofit government watchdog group asserted Friday.
Was there anyone who actually thought the Justice Department wouldn't expand the Patriot Act?
Since there is apparent "surprise" at this action I guess there were.
"Surprise, surprise, surprise."
5 posted on 02/07/2003 4:21:33 PM PST by philman_36
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AdamSelene235
"I (state your name), do hereby swear (hand on the Bible) to protect the Constitution of the United States, from all enemies, foreign and domestic..."

LOL!

6 posted on 02/07/2003 4:58:20 PM PST by GhostofWCooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RCW2001
But, I thought we were making inroads against terrorism.
7 posted on 02/07/2003 5:35:50 PM PST by Sparta (Statism is a mental illness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #8 Removed by Moderator

To: RCW2001

Expansion of Patriot Act Criticized  

Friday, February 07, 2003 6:17 p.m. ET

The Justice Department is preparing to expand the 2001 Patriot Act to increase surveillance within the United States while restricting access to information and limiting judicial review, a nonprofit government watchdog group asserted Friday.

The Center for Public Integrity said it obtained a copy of the draft legislation from a government source. The document, labeled "confidential," was posted Friday on the organization's Internet site along with an analysis.

Justice Department officials said no final decisions have made on any such legislation, and it could change substantially before it is completed. Spokeswoman Barbara Comstock acknowledged the department is "continually considering anti-terrorism measures and would be derelict if we were not doing so." "The department's deliberations are always undertaken with the strongest commitment to our Constitution and civil liberties," she added.

The original Patriot Act, passed by Congress in the weeks following the Sept. 11, 2001, terror attacks, gave the government broad new anti-terrorism powers to use wiretaps, electronic and computer eavesdropping, searches and the authority to obtain a wide range of other information in it's investigations. It also broke down the traditional wall between FBI investigators and intelligence agents.

According to the Center for Public Integrity, the draft expansion of the Patriot Act would be called the Domestic Security Enhancement Act of 2003.

Among other things, it would prohibit disclosure of information regarding people detained as terrorist suspects and prevent the Environmental Protection Agency from distributing "worst-case scenario" information to the public about a nearby private company's use of chemicals.

In addition, the measure would create a DNA database of "suspected terrorists;" force suspects to prove why they should be released on bail, rather than have the prosecution prove why they should be held; and allow the deportation of U.S. citizens who become members of or help terrorist groups. "It really is a broadening and a deepening of the government's powers," said Charles Lewis, executive director of the Center for Public Integrity.

Congressional aides said they had not been consulted by the Justice Department on the development of such a bill and department officials say it has not been transmitted to Capitol Hill. However, several aids have said they considered it likely that the Bush administration would propose some changes this year.

Rep. John Conyers of Michigan, top Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee, said the legislation "turns the Bill of Rights completely on its head."

"This draft bill constitutes yet another egregious blow to our citizens' civil liberties," Conyers said. "Among other things, the Bush administration now wants to imprison suspects before they are tried and create DNA databases of lawful residents who have committed no crime." ___

Associated Press writer Jesse Holland contributed to this report.

On the Net: Center for Public Integrity:

http://www.publicintegrity.org

Justice Department: http://www.usdoj.gov

9 posted on 02/07/2003 7:21:59 PM PST by ATOMIC_PUNK (An American Fellowship of Freedom loving Conservatives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EBUCK
ROTFFLMGDAO.......

you can say that again!

10 posted on 02/07/2003 7:56:29 PM PST by rface (Ashland, Missouri)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: rface
BUMP for a RETURN to our Constitution and the Republic for which it stood...
11 posted on 02/07/2003 9:07:02 PM PST by dcwusmc ("The most dangerous man, to any government, is the man who is able to think things out for himself.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: RCW2001
This page has a link to the 12Meg PDF file with the full text.
12 posted on 02/07/2003 9:29:02 PM PST by lonewacko_dot_com (http://lonewacko.com/blog)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: firebrand; rmlew; Cacique
So much for sunsetting the bad bits of the PA.
13 posted on 02/07/2003 9:31:09 PM PST by Black Agnes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: stainlessbanner; sheltonmac; shuckmaster; aomagrat; Constitution Day
Among other things, it would prohibit disclosure of information regarding people detained as terrorist suspects

Well we all know there's a precedent gentlemen. I'm at a complete loss for words. Now they can claim you're a terrorist, lock you up, never release your name, and poof you're gone.

14 posted on 02/07/2003 9:52:57 PM PST by billbears (Deo Vindice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: *BillOfRights
http://www.freerepublic.com/perl/bump-list
15 posted on 02/07/2003 10:03:58 PM PST by Libertarianize the GOP (Ideas have consequences)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: EBUCK
The department's deliberations are always undertaken with the strongest commitment to our Constitution and civil liberties," she added.
ROTFFLMGDAO......

Actually I belive and agree with every word of that statement.

After all she did say "The department's deliberations are always undertaken with the strongest commitment to our Constitution and civil liberties,"
Infrence the "department" and you can see that "the department" seems to be the only ones HAVING any civil liberties.

16 posted on 02/08/2003 1:06:08 AM PST by alexandria ( I PLEAD THE FITH!! And after further thinking about it, I DECLINE TO COMMENT!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: RCW2001
"Seig Heil" Alert
17 posted on 02/08/2003 1:14:11 AM PST by WhiteGuy ( - Ron Paul 2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: billbears
Well we all know there's a precedent gentlemen. I'm at a complete loss for words. Now they can claim you're a terrorist, lock you up, never release your name, and poof you're gone.

Yes, we now see the Department of "Justice" falling to the level of the Argentinian generals, who "disappeared" thousands of enemies of that particular State. Americans helped expose that particular travesty. Who will expose it when this happens to us?

18 posted on 02/08/2003 4:18:24 AM PST by Greybird (One-fourth German. Proud of it. We helped build this country. Get used to it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: RCW2001
I don't think they'll get this. I think this is one of those mental games where they're proposing all sorts of outlandish crap so that they can can later "be willing to give up" all the crazy parts in conference in order to get the one or two little things they really want.

And if I am wrong, I think this will be voted down. It just goes too far, even for most Republicans.

19 posted on 02/08/2003 4:24:30 AM PST by Timesink (My name's Harley Earl, and I've come back to build you a great tampon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RCW2001
I'm growing sick to my stomach with this administrations secretive nature and deceipt. We are the backbone of the Republican Party. Ignore the people and they shall ignore you.

Another Republican had best step up to the plate for 2004, or I may be forced to vote Democrat.
20 posted on 02/08/2003 6:16:37 AM PST by mhillclimber (How many times do you have to get hit on the head before you realize who's hitting you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson