Posted on 02/09/2003 7:45:33 AM PST by veronica
Even after ten screenings a day for the past two weeks, a film charging that the French media is biased against Israel is still playing to packed houses in Paris.
The film, Decryptage (Decoding), has caught the mood of French Jews who long have felt that the French medias depiction of the Mideast shows a distinctly pro-Palestinian slant.
The films producers, Jacques Tarnero and Philippe Bensoussan, say it is an opinion piece rather than a documentary. But the film has succeeded in provoking widespread debate in the French press, not only for its content but also for the fact that it appears to have struck a chord among French Jews.
Each day, French Jews have gathered outside the Arlequin cinema in the heart of Pariss movie district on the Left Bank of the Seine, in what often appears more a gesture of solidarity with Israel than a desire for a night out.
The lines stretch down the street, and people who cant get tickets are forced to return for later showings.
People come to feel united. Its something between personal therapy, a family visit, the synagogue and a football game, Bensoussan explained.
Indeed, the vast majority of viewers are Jews, a fact that irritates some in the audience.
I knew everyone in there, student David Biton, 17, told JTA. Its a good film, but its much more important for non-Jews to see it. They should put it on at other cinemas. Its difficult enough as it is just to get tickets here.
Biton came to see the film with three friends, all classmates from his Jewish school in Paris. Most of his family and friends had seen the movie, he said, but he had had little success persuading non-Jewish friends to come.
They should put it on TV, Biton said. Then people might see the truth instead of the disinformation they constantly feed us.
Decryptage claims that there is a persistent campaign by important sections of the French media most notably by the leading daily, Le Monde, and the international press agency, Agence France Presse to blame Israel for the outbreak of the Palestinian intifada in September 2000.
The film charges that major French television channels consciously and deliberately blamed Israels then-opposition leader, Ariel Sharon, for the violence that began the day after his visit to the Temple Mount in Jerusalem.
Moreover, the film details what it describes as evidence that the Palestinian Authority planned the intifada even while it was involved in peace negotiations with Israel, details that were ignored or glossed over by French media.
The film also includes footage of how Palestinian children are educated to hate Israel and Jews. It also strongly criticizes the portrayal by the France 2 television channel of the death of a young Palestinian boy, Mohammed al-Dura, in Israeli-Palestinian crossfire in the Gaza Strip in October 2000.
The image of al-Duras death, captured by a French cameraman, became one of the indelible early images of the intifada and was used to whip up anti-Israel sentiment around the world even though investigations later showed that al-Dura might well have been killed by a Palestinian bullet.
But the film is not simply an apologetic for the current Israeli government; indeed, both Tarnero and Bensoussan are somewhat left-of-center when it comes to the Middle East.
Rather, they were motivated to produce Decryptage by what Tarnero describes as a hateful holding to account of Israel and an intellectual scandal in France and in Europe.
We have nothing against criticism of the policies of the government of the State of Israel, Tarnero states in the films preamble. But what we have seen for two years now, and under the appearance of political criticism, is just demonization, defamation and denunciation of Israel.
The film takes as its starting point the 1995 assassination of Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin. It includes interviews with leading members of Israels peace camp such as former Prime Minister Ehud Barak and his foreign minister, Shlomo Ben-Ami as well as left-wing intellectuals in Israel and France.
From the moment of its release Jan. 22, Decryptage has gotten much publicity in the French press though many publications accused it of presenting only one point of view.
Typical were the comments of Ange-Dominique Bouzet in the center-left daily Liberation, which itself comes in for criticism in the film. Bouzet described Decryptage as a propaganda documentary that is part of a militant attempt at disinformation.
However, Philippe Cohen of Marianne noted that Decryptage was very much a symptom of the fracture between those who guard Palestine in their hearts and those who live Israel in their guts.
Later, even Liberation ran a two-page spread on Decryptage, describing it as a docu-mirror of French Jews.
Decryptage has mobilized the community, the paper said.
Interestingly, Marianne also wondered whether campaigns for more balanced media coverage of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict were starting to have an effect.
Criticizing the tendency of the French press to see things in black-and-white terms, Mariannes publisher, Jean-Francois Kahn, wrote that the media was generally pro-Palestinian, in the same way it was or is pro-Biafran, pro-Bangladeshi, pro-Bosnian or pro-Chechen.
Nevertheless, there was an increasing attempt within the media to adopt a more balanced approach to matters both Jewish and Israeli, and we can only rejoice about that, he said.
Even among Jews lining up at the Arlequin, there was agreement on that score.
You know, I watch TV here and I see the news, but I have children in Israel so I see both sides, Suzy Soussan told JTA. But its getting better here and theres a lot less negative reporting because, finally, the community is doing something about it.
Decryptage ends with the famous quote from Hillel: If I am not for myself, who will be for me?
With the seats at the Arlequin still filled to capacity, French Jews appear to have taken the message very much to heart.
|
What I'm afraid to see happening here is that many of the viewers are seen as Jews, not just French. Something like 10% of France is now Muslim. France has a history of turning over their Jewish citizens, and that was before there was a Muslim influx. To the great shame of Christianity, many so-called French Christians turned in their neighbors because the winning side at that time ordered it. This issue may be polarizing, but at least the truth will be heard and it may influence a few non-Jews.
Not to worry though, Americans have LONG memories and we will never come to their aid again.
Is this another Kristallnacht?
Agree. What I don't understand is why the film's producers, Jacques Tarnero and Philippe Bensoussan are still Leftists or as this article says, left-of-center when it comes to the Middle East. I mean, it's the Left who is pro-Palestinians and have so much antipathy towards Israel.
You say that like it's a bad thing...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.